This research is motivated by the fact that humans have two strong desires in themselves, namely the desire to be one with each other or other humans around them and the desire to become one with the surrounding natural environment. Privacy is used to express themselves, so someone needs a room that supports these interests. Where each individual sets the distance for closeness with other individuals, and the ability of a person or group to decide when and to whom personal information can be shared, in the way desired by the owner of the information.

The purpose of this study was to determine the millennial self-concept in managing privacy information boundaries. The management of privacy information boundaries is discussed in the process of five basic assumptions on the theory of communication privacy management.

This research uses constructivist paradigm with descriptive research type. The research method used is phenomenology, data collection techniques in this study were obtained through premier data: in-depth interviews and secondary data through: literature study, documentation sourced in books, journals and the internet. Data validity checking technique used is auhenticity & triangulation (sources).

The results of the following research are millennial self-concept in managing privacy information by controlling the privacy information that is collected and collected, then millennial makes boundaries with people who can understand and understand the rules that have been agreed upon, control information that has been shared with others, after that millennial made rules that had been mutually agreed upon in the disclosure of information, and in responding to the occurrence of safety information, 11 millennial informants chose to withdraw and 3 millennial informants maintained a good relationship.

Privacy boundaries, self-concept, milenial

1) Agung, I. (2012). Panduan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Bagi Guru. Jakarta: Bestari Buana Murni.

2) Aspers, P. (2009). Empirical Phenomenology: A Qualitative Study Approach (The Cologne Seminars). Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology. https://doi.org/10.1080/20797222.2009.11433992

3) Baxter, L., Braithwaite, D., Petronio, S., & Durham, W. T. (2014). Communication Privacy Management Theory: Significance for Interpersonal Communication. In Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329529.n23

4) Buchanan, D. R. (1998). Beyond positivism: Humanistic perspectives on theory and study in health education. Health Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/13.3.439

5) Chatterjee, J. S., Frank, L. B., Murphy, S. T., & Power, G. (2009). The Importance of Interpersonal Discussion and Self- Efficacy in Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Models ANURUDRA BHANOT BBC World Service Trust. International Journal of Communication.

6) Dwyer, K. K., & Cruz, A. M. (1998). Communication apprehension, personality, and grades in the basic course: Are there correlations? International Journal of Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362143

7) Greene, J. O. (2003). Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607133

8) Griffin, R; Moorhead, G. (2014). Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations: Ricky W. Griffin, Gregory Moorhead. Cengage Learning.

9) Griffin, E., Cossio, M. L. T., Giesen, L. F., Araya, G., Pérez-Cotapos, M. L. S., VERGARA, R. L., … Héritier, F. (2012). A First Look On Communication Theory, 8th Edition. Uma ética para quantos?

10) Hughes, A., Galbraith, D., & White, D. (2011). Perceived competence: A common core for self-efficacy and selfconcept? Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.559390

11) Jin, S. A. A. (2013). Peeling back the multiple layers of Twitter’s private disclosure onion: The roles of virtual identity discrepancy and personality traits in communication privacy management on Twitter. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812471814

12) Kohli, S., & Gupta, A. (2015). Identification of Human Behavioral Traits Using Social Media. International Journal of Multimedia and Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijmip.2042.4647.2015.0031

13) Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D. (2012). The Mutual Shaping of Social Media, Learning Experiences, and Literacies: The Methods Revisited. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries Journal.

14) McDaniel, E. R., Samovar, L. A., & Porter, R. E. (2012). Using intercultural communication: The building blocks. Intercultural communication: A reader.

15) Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). In PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

16) Naldo. (2018). Studi Observasi terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi LINE oleh Generasi Millenial. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Terapan, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jsht.v1i1.33

17) Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2003). Organizational behavior: foundation, realities and challenges (4th Ed.). Australia: Thomson South-Western.

18) Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (1994). Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, and Challenges. Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, and Challenges.

19) Nurhayati, E. (2012). Psikologi Perempuan Dalam Berbagai Perspektif. (Siti Muyassarotul Hafidzoh, Ed.) (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

20) Pane, D. N., Fikri, M. EL, & Ritonga, H. M. (2018). PSIKOLOGI LINTAS BUDAYA. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

21) Richard West, L. H. T. (2008). Pengantar Teori Komunikasi: Analisis dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

22) Robinson, S. C. (2017). Self-disclosure and managing privacy: Implications for interpersonal and online communication for consumers and marketers. Journal of Internet Commerce. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2017.1402637

23) Rubin, R. B., Powers, D. E., Martin, M. M., & Bruning, S. S. (1993). Test of a Self-Efficacy Model of Interpersonal Communication Competence. Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369880

24) Sarwono, S. W. & E. A. M. (2009). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

25) Slocum, J. W. and D. H. (2007). Fundamental of Organizational Behavior. Ohio: Thomson- SouthWestern.

26) Springborg, P. (2007). Phenomenology and the social sciences. Autralian Journal of Political Science, 55(3).

27) Sugiono. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Kualitaif R&D. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif R&D, Alvabeta, Bandung.

28) Sutopo, H. B. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Aplikasinya dalam Penelitian.

29) W, R. W. A., Poluakan, M. V., Dikayuana, D., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2020). POTRET GENERASI MILENIAL PADA ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0. Focus : Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i2.26241

30) Wood, J. T. (2013). Komunikasi Interpersonal Interaksi Keseharian. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis.

VOlUME 03 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2020