¹Jeane Stevani Risdianto, ²A. Tulus Sartono

¹,²Master of Law Studies Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-34

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aimed to analyze the role of Bank Indonesia (BI) and the Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) of the banking activities in Indonesia and to analyze the legal protection of bank customers. There are two issues discussed in this study, the first regarding the role of OJK and Bank Indonesia in supervising crime in the banking world and the second regarding legal protection for customers victims of savings accounts break-ins crime. The research method used was normative juridical, by studying and reviewing legal principles derived from library materials. The discussions that were discussed in this article were how the role of OJK and Bank Indonesia in supervising crime in the banking world and how legal protection is for customers who are victims of savings account burglary in Indonesia. The Otoritas Jasa Keuangan regulation (PJOK) also requires banks to compensate for losses suffered by customers. Article 29 PJOK Number 1/PJOK.07/2013 states "Otoritas Jasa Keuangan is required to be responsible for Consumer losses arising from errors and/or negligence, management, employees of Financial Services Business Actors and/or third parties working for the interests of the Financial Services Providers. Financial Services Business. Lawsuits that can be pursued through the courts can be in the form of criminal charges or civil lawsuits. Embezzlement of bank customer deposits may be subjected to Article 372 and Article 374 of the Criminal Code (KUHP).

KEYWORDS:

Protection, Piercing, FSA, Customers, Banking

REFERENCES

1. Alboukrek, Karen, ‘Adapting to A New World of E-Commerce: The Need for Uniform Consumer Protection in the International Electronic Marketplace’, George Washington International Law Review, 35.2 (2003), 420–31

2. Andryanto, S. Dian, ‘6 Kasus Pembobolan Rekening Nasabah Bank Sepanjang 2021, Jebol Miliaran Rupiah’, Tempo.Co, 2021 [accessed 20 July 2021]

3. Antonio, Muhammad Syafi‟i, Bank Syariah: Dari Teori Ke Praktik (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2017)

4. Dwi Edi Wibowo, ‘How Consumers in Indonesia Are Protected Fairly?Analysis of Law No. 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection’, Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 2.1 (2020), 57–70

5. Effendy, Marwan, Tipologi Kejahatan Perbankan Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Referensi, 2012)

6. Hasanah, Uswatun, Hukum Perbankan (Malang: Setara Press, 2017)

7. Hermansyah, Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006)

8. Margareta Waworuntu, Tri Oldy Rotinsulu, Dennij Mandeij, ‘Peran Sektor Perbankan Dalam MengembangkanDaya Saing Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah (UMKM) Indonesia Memasuki Pasar MEA 2010-2015’, Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 17.1 (2017), 183–93

9. Nun Harrieti, ‘Kewenangan Bank Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Pasca Berlakunya POJK Nomor 1/POJK. 07/2013 Dan POJK Nomor 1/POJK. 07/2014 Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Nasabah Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 1.2 (2016), 329–43

10. Pamuji, Reza Aditya, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Dan Tanggung Jawab Bank Dalam Kasus Card Skimming’, Jurnal Lex Rennassance, 3.1 (2018), 25–43

11. Putra, Riadhi Tedi, ‘Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Terhadap Pembobolan Rekening Nasabah Oleh Pegawai Bank’, Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1.2 (2020), 181–85

12. Sampul, M., ‘Tanggung Jawab Bank Terhadap Hak Yang Dirugikan Dalam Pembobolan Rekening Nasabah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan’, Lex Crimen, 5.7 (2016), 125–32

13. Suherman, ‘Upaya Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Lembaga Perbankan’, ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 4.1 (2018), 109–22

14. Sulistyandari, ‘Lembaga Dan Fungsi Pengawasan Perbankan Di Indonesia’, Mimbar Hukum, 24.2 (2012), 226–40

15. Thomas, Kristie, ‘Law, Analysing the Notion of “Consumer” in China’s Consumer Protection’, The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 6.2 (2018), 294–318

16. Wafiya, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Yang Mengalami Kerugian Dalam Transaksi Perbankan Melalui Internet’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kanun, 56.14 (2012), 37–52

17. Yustianti, Surti, ‘Kewenangan Pengaturan Dan Pengawasan Perbankan Oleh Bank Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK)’, ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 1.1 (2017), 60–72

18. Zulfi Diane Zaini, ‘Pengalihan Fungsi Pengawasan Lem Baga Perbankan Dari Bank Indonesia Ke Otor Itas Jasa Keuangan’, Pranata Hukum, 9.1 (2014), 1–10

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2021