¹Agustina Riyanti,²Theresia Trisanti

¹,²STIE YKPN, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN, Jalan Seturan Yogyakarta 55281.Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-36

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of the six elements of fraud hexagon theory on potential financial statement fraud by involving the audit committee which acts as a moderating variable in the financial statements of state- owned companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2020. Potential financial statement fraud is measured using the f-score model. The research sample was obtained by the purposive sampling technique. Data analysis methods and techniques include descriptive statistics, evaluation of the SEM-PLS model, and hypothesis testing. The results show that financial pressure has a positive effect on potential financial statement fraud, effective monitoring has a negative effect on potential financial statement fraud, while related party transactions, CEO education, CEO narcissism, and political connection do not affect potential financial statement fraud. The role of the audit committee as a moderating variable is only able to weaken the relationship between financial pressure and potential financial statement fraud.

KEYWORDS:

Fraud Hexagon Theory, Financial Statement Fraud, Audit Committee

REFERENCES

1) Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent for Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, 5, 38–45.

2) Astuti, S., Marita, & Heriningsih, S. (2019). Analysis Factor Triggers Fraud And Corporate Governance On Indications of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Pentagon Fraud Theory Approach. Eksis, 14(1), 48–54.

3) Aviantara, R. (2019). The BIG 4 Role in Moderating the Detection of Fraud Pentagon Against Fraudulent Financial Reports ( Study on Indonesian Public Sector Government Companies ). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 4531, 94–107.

4) Badolato, P. G., Donelson, D. C., & Ege, M. (2014). Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Earnings Management: The Role of Status. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 208–230.

5) Chen, J. J., Chengb, P., & Xiao, X. (2011). Related Party Transactions as a Source of Earnings Management. Applied Financial Economics, 21(3), 165–181.

6) CNN Indonesia. (2019, April 30). Kronologi Kisruh Laporan Keuangan Garuda Indonesia. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190430174733-92-390927/kronologi-kisruh-laporan-keuangan-garuda-indonesia

7) Damayani, F., Wahyudi, T., & Yuniartie, E. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Infrastruktur Yangterdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesiatahun 2014 – 2016. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Akuntansi, 11(2), 151–170.

8) Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28.

9) Dewi, K., & Anisykurlillah, I. (2021). Analysis of the Effect of Fraud Pentagon Factors on Fraudulent Financial Statement with Audit Committee as Moderating Variable. Accounting Analysis Journal, 10(1), 39–46.

10) El-helaly, M., Geprgiou, I., & Lowe, A. D. (2020). The Interplay Between Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management-: The Role of Audit Quality. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 1–45.

11) Fitri, F. A., & Syukur, M. (2019). Do The Fraud Triangle Components Motivate Fraud In Indonesia-? Do The Fraud Triangle Components Motivate Fraud In Indonesia-? 13(4), 63–72.

12) Habib, A., Muhammadi, A. H., & Jiang, H. (2017). Political Connections and Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Accounting, 52(1), 45–63.

13) Handoko, B. L., & Ramadhani, K. A. (2017). The Influence of Audit Committee Characteristics, Financial Expertise, and Company Size toward the Possibility of Financial Report Fraud. DeReMa (Development Research of Management): Jurnal Manajemen, 12(1), 86.

14) Hasnan, S., Abdul Rahman, R., & Mahenthiran, S. (2013). Management Motive, Weak Governance, Earnings Management, and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Malaysian Evidence. Journal of International Accounting Research, 12(1), 1–27.

15) Horwarth, C. (2011). Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough. Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Journal.

16) Ika, S. R., & Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2012). Audit Committee Effectiveness and Timeliness of Reporting: Indonesian Evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(4), 403–424.

17) Indriyani, E., & Suryandari, D. (2021). Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statement Through Pentagon Theory with Audit Committee as Moderating. Economic and Accounting Journal, 4(1), 35–47.

18) Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(10), 305–360.

19) Kamarudin, K. A., & Ismail, W. A. W. (2014). The Effects of Audit Committee Attributes on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10(5), 507–514.

20) Kusumawardani, D. B. (2018). Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. 1–80.

21) Lastanti, H. S. (2020). Role of Audit Committee in the Fraud Pentagon and Financial Statement Fraud. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(1), 77.

22) Lokanan, M., & Sharma, S. (2018). A Fraud Triangle Analysis of the Libor Fraud. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 10(2), 187–212.

23) Marchini, P. L., Mazza, T., & Medioli, A. (2018). Related Party Transactions, Corporate Governance and Earnings Management. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(6), 1124–1146.

24) Matangkin, L., Ng, S., & Mardiana, A. (2018). Pengaruh Kemampuan Manajerial Dan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Reaksi Investor Dengan Kecurangan Laporan Keungan Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Simak, 16(02), 181–208.

25) Md Nasir, N. A. B., Ali, M. J., & Nawi, N. binti C. (2019). Studies on Earnings Management and Financial Statement Fraud in Corporate Firms. Research in World Economy, 10(2 Special Issue), 15–19.

26) Oke Finance. (2016). Direksi Timah Dituding Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan. Oke Finance. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2016/01/27/278/1298264/direksi-timah-dituding-manipulasi-laporan-keuangan

27) Oke Finance. (2020). Fakta Terkini Kasus Jiwasraya, Maipulasi Laporan Keuangan Hingga Rencana Penyelesaian. Oke Finance. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2020/01/17/320/2154310/fakta-terkini-kasus-jiwasraya-manipulasi-laporan-keuangan-hingga-rencana-penyelesaian

28) Ozcelik, H. (2020). An Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Fraud Diamond Theory Perspective: An Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Sector Companies Listed on the Borsa Istanbul. 102, 131–153.

29) Prasetyo, A. B. (2014). Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Dan Perusahaan Terhadap Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 11(1), 1–24.

30) Pusphita, M. Y., & Yasa, G. W. (2018). Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting ( Study on Indonesian Capital Market ). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 42(5), 93–109.

31) Rasmussen, S. J. (2013). Revenue Recognition, Earnings Management, and Earnings Informativeness in the Semiconductor Industry. Accounting Horizons, 27(1), 91–112.

32) Richardson, S. A., Sloan, R. G., Soliman, M. T., & Tuna, I. (2005). Accrual Reliability , Earnings Persistence and Stock Prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 437–485.

33) Sari, M. P., Pramasheilla, N., Fachrurrozie, Suryarini, T., & Paimuigkas, I. D. (2020). Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting with the Role of KAP Big Four as a Moderation Variable: Crowe’s Fraud’s Pentagon Theory. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5), 180–190.

34) Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and Firms. In Quarterly Journal of Economics (Vol. 109, Issue 4, pp. 995–1025).

35) Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2008). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99. SSRN Electronic Journal, 99.

36) Supri, Z., Rura, Y., & Pontoh, G. T. (2018). Detection of Fraudulent Financial Statements with Fraud Diamond. Journal of Research in Business and Management, Volume 6(Issue 5), pp: 39-45.

37) Tempo. (2003). Bapepam: Kasus Kimia Farma Merupakan Tindakan Pidana. BisnisTempo. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/33339/bapepam-kasus-kimia-farma-merupakan-tindak-pidana

38) Tempo. (2009). Tiga Direksi Waskita Dinonaktifkan. Bisnis Tempo. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/194968/tiga-direksi-waskita-dinonaktifkan

39) Tessa G, C., & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Pada Sektor Keuangan Dan Perbankan Di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 1–21.

40) Tribun News. (2020). Kasus Proyek Fiktif, Eks Pejabat Waskita Karya Diduga Manipulasi Data Keuangan. Tribun News. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2020/10/13/kasus-proyek-fiktif-eks-pejabat-waskita-karya-diduga-manipulasi-data-keuangan

41) Trisanti, T. (2020a). Analysis of Factors that Lead to Financial Distress for Property and Real Estate Companies in Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen Indonesia, 03(1), 302–315.

42) Trisanti, T. (2020b). Effect of Independent Commissioners and Characteristics of Audit Committee on Profit Quality with Earning Management as Intervening Variables. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 03(12), 394– 402.

43) Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381.

44) Wailan’an, E. J. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond terhadap Pendeteksian Financial Statement Fraud dengan Komiye Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015 - 2017. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

45) Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond-: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

46) Ying, C. H., & Mei, Y. C. (2014). CEO Education and Firm Performance-: Evidence from Hong Kong. Hong Kong Baptist University, April

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2021