VOlUME 04 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2021
1Romy, A.K,2 Ajurun, B.A, 3Baharudin, S,4 Romai Noor, R 5Halimatun Saadiah, H
1,2,3,4,5 Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Pendidikan Teknik
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims to identify the level of knowledge, attitude and readiness of students of the Institute of Teacher Education, Technical Education Campus (IPGKPT) on virtual learning. Correspondingly, a study was administered to a sample of 988 trainee teachers. Likert-based questionnaires which was distributed through google forms were utilized as the instrument in this descriptive study. Findings revealed that the level of knowledge is at a high degree with an average mean value of 3.02 (sd = 0.78), while the level of attitude of trainee teachers towards virtual learning is at a moderate degree with an average mean value of 2.94 (sp = 0.88) and likewise the level of readiness of the trainee teachers is high with an average mean value of 3.32 (sp = 0.78). Based on the questionnaire conducted online and the findings of the study from the respondents it was found that virtual learning entails positive implications but some improvements are required in order to increase the quality of virtual learning in IPGKPT.
KEYWORDS:Virtual learning, knowledge, readiness.
REFERENCES
1) Maltby and S. Mackie (2009) Virtual learning environments – help or hindrance for the ‘disengaged’ student?, ALT-J, 17:1, 49-62, DOI: 10.1080/09687760802657577
2) Baharin Abu, Othman Md Johan, Syed Mohd Shafeq Syed Mansor dan Haliza Jaafar, (2007). Kepelbagaian Gaya Pembelajaran dan Kemahiran Belajar Pelajar Universiti di Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Johor. Research Vote No: 71881. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
3) Brown,A (2018) Engaging students as partners in developing online learning and feedback activities for first-year fluid mechanics, European Journal of Engineering Education, 43:1, 26-39, DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1232372
4) Chin, C., (2020). Teaching Through the Telly. Sunday Star
5) Creswell JW, (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Education.
6) Ewell W.H& Rodgers R.R. (2014) Enhancing Student Preparedness for Class through Course Preparation Assignments: Preliminary Evidence from the Classroom, Journal of Political Science Education, 10:2, 204-221, DOI: 10.1080/15512169.2014.893760
7) Ewelina Lacka & T. C. Wong (2019): Examining the impact of digital technologies on students’ higher education outcomes: the case of the virtual learning environment and social media, Studies in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1698533
8) Foong, S.Z.Y., Lam, Y.L., Andiappan, V., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., (2018). A systematic approach for the synthesis and optimization of palm oil milling processes. Ind.Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 2945–2955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04788.
9) Gao, F., T. Luo, and K. Zhang. 2012. “Tweeting for Learning: A Critical Analysis of Research on Microblogging in Education Published in 2008–2011.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 783–801.
10) Harison, H., (2004). Analisis Keupayaan Pembelajaran Maya dan Realiti (Sistem Pneumatik) di Kalangan Pelajar Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional. UTHM.
11) Huang, Y.-C., Backman, S. J., & Backman, K. F. (2010). Student Attitude Toward Virtual Learning in Second Life: A Flow Theory Approach. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 10(4), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2010.525425
12) Jones, C.; Shao, B. (2011), The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education., Higher Education Academy, York, UK.
13) Khasiman, S.A. (2013). Tinjauan Awal Pengguna Frog VLE Di Sekolah. http://sekolahpenandaaras.wordpress.com
14) Kerjcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research. Educational and Psychologyical Measurement. 30, 607-610.
15) Kok, K.H., (2020). Interaksi Tidak Bersemuka dan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan
16) Wabak Covid-19. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd
17) Lai, C.S., Normawati, K., Rashidah, L., Noridah, H., (2017). Tahap Penggunaan Pembelajaran Maya Dalam Kalangan Guru Reka Bentuk Teknologi : Satu Tinjauan di Sekolah Luar Bandar.
18) Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbitan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
19) Prensky, Marc (September 2001). "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1". On the Horizon. 9 (5): 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816. ISSN 1074-8121.
20) Pusat Kecemerlangan Akademik., (17 April 2020). Rumusan Laporan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Dalam Talian Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan Fasa 1 & 2. http//:www.moe.gov.my/ipgm.
21) Sulaiman, Wahid, 2002, Jalan Pintas Menguasai SPSS 10, edisi pertama, Andi, Yogyakarta
22) Wiersma, W. 1991. Research methods in education. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23) Zilka, G. C., Rahimi, I. D., & Cohen, R. (2019). Sense of Challenge, Threat, SelfEfficacy, and Motivation of Students Learning in Virtual and Blended Courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1554990
24) Zolkepeli, H. (2017). Kesediaan Guru Mengimplementasikan KBAT dalam Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Matematik Sekolah Rendah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.