The current research investigates the use of collocations in students’ academic writings to obtain information about the popular types of collocations they use, the collocational errors, and the sources of errors. The design of the study is a qualitative research which employed document analysis as the instrument to collect data. 50 students were the population and the samples as well. The results show that students have a tendency of using Type 1 (Verb-Noun) and Type 2 (Adjective-Noun) collocations more than the other types. With regard to the collocational errors, it is noted that Type 1 and Type 2 are also the top types in which students make mistakes. Additionally, verbs and adjectives are the main parts that students mostly have problems with. On examining the sources of errors, the researcher found five causes including approximation, the ignorance of rule restriction, negative transfer, the use of synonyms, and false concept hypothesized. Among these error sources, negative transfer is the most important factor leading to students’ collocational errors.

Academic writing, collocation, collocation errors, negative transfer

1) Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations? System, 21(1), 101-114.
2) Begagic, M. (2014). English language students’ productive and receptive knowledge of collocations. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 2 (1), pp.46-67.
3) Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1986). The BBI combinatory dictionary of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4) Brashi, A. (2009). Collocability as a problem in L2 production. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 8 (1), pp.21- 34.
5) Crossman, A. (2019). An Overview of Qualitative Research Methods. Retrieved 29th October 2019 from https://www.thoughtco.com/qualitative-research-methods-3026555
6) Duan, M. & Qin, X. (2012). Collocation in English Teaching and Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(9), pp. 1890-1894. DOI: 10.4304/tpls.2.9.1890-1894.
7) Faddah, H. (2011). Difficulties in Academic Writing: From the Perspective of King Saud University Postgraduate Students. English Language Teaching, 5(3), pp.123-130.
8) Firth, J. (1957). Modes of meaning. In J. Firth (Ed.), Papers in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9) Hill, J. (1999). Collocational competence. English Teaching Professional, 11, pp. 3-6.
10) Hill, J. (2000). Revising priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp.47-69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11) Hussein, R. (1990). Collocations: The missing link in vocabulary acquisition amongst English foreign learners. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics. The Polish–English contrastive project (Vol. 26, pp. 123-136). Pozan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
12) Lewis, M. (2008). Teaching collections-Further development in the lexical approach. New York: Heinle.
13) Lewis, M. (Ed.). (2000). Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14) McCarthy, M. & O’Dell, F. (2005). English Collocations in Use Intermediate. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
15) Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Armsterdam: J. Benjamins Publishing Company.
16) Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
17) Palmer, H. E. (1993). Second interim report on English collocations. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
18) Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19) Stulpinaitė, M., Horbačauskienė, J. & Kasperavičienė, R. (2016). Issues in Translation of Linguistic Collocations. Studies about languages, 29, pp. 4-37.
20) Tode, T. (2013). Chunking and prefabrication. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, Peter Robinson (ed). New York: Routledge

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 05 MAY 2021