¹Tio Lucito, ²Iwan Erar Joesoef

^1,2Faculty of law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jl. RS Fatmawati Raya No. 1, Jakarta Selatan ,12450, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i7-26

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to examine the judge's decision which overrides the first to file principle in trademark disputes. The number of piracy of these well-known brands certainly causes a loss that is not only experienced by the brand owners themselves, it is necessary to have a control mechanism in the form of methods or dispute resolution mechanisms. In deciding this case between RSO and PT. AGBS, the Judge ruled by setting aside a strong principle in Mark Registration, namely the first to file principle by prioritizing the principle of bad faith. The results of the study found that judges saw all aspects and problems of the case from the beginning, not only seeing from one point of view, but also using a theoretical approach in making decisions in order to achieve justice for the parties involved. The research was carried out in a normative juridical manner by reviewing data on court decisions, laws and regulations and related literature. The conclusion of the study is that the Judge in deciding this case by canceling the Mark on behalf of RSO is to override the First to File principle because there is a Bad Faith principle carried out by RSO to control and or confiscate the trademark from PT. AGBS. This was obtained because from the results of the Brand Ambassador agreement that bad faith began to occur by the RSO Party

Keywords

brand; first to files; bad faith

REFERENCES

Books :


1) Iswi Hariyani, 2010, Prosedur Mengurus HAKI yang Benar, Pustaka Yustisia, Jakarta, hal. 6.

2) Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan, hal 10

3) Mahkamah Agung RI, Penemuan hukum dan Pemecahan Masalah Hukum, Proyek Pengembangan Teknis Yustisial Mahkamah Agung RI.

4) Franz Magnis Suseno, Etika Dasar Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral, Jakarta: Pustaka Filsafat, 1987, hal. 33.

5) Oemar Seno Adji, Peradilan Bebas Negara Hukum, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1987, Hal. 46, Ibid, hal. 167.

6) Ahmad Rifai, Penemuan Hukum, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2010, Hal. 102.

7) Suyud Margono, 2011, Hak Milik Industri: Pengaturan dan Praktik di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, hal. 79.

8) Ok Saidin, Aspek Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual (intellectual Property Rights), Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004, Hal 330, Ibid, hal 67.

9) Jisia Mamahit, “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Merek Dalam Perdagangan Barang Dan Jasa”, Lex Privatum, Volume, 1. No. 3. Juli 2013. Hal. 92.

10) Ahmadi Miru, “Hukum Merek : Cara Mudah Mempelajari Undang-Undang Merek”, (Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007), Hal. 34.
Legislation :


1) Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016

2) Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang tentang Kekuasaan Hakim. Undang-Undang Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009.

3) Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia tentang Pendaftaran Merek, Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 67 tahun 2016.

4) Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 57/PDT.SUS-MEREK/2019/PN Niaga JKT.PST.
Journal:


1) Anonim, https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-getting-started/trademark-process#step6 diakses pada tanggal 11 April 2021.

2) Anonim, https://www.ipos.gov.sg/protecting-your-ideas/trade-mark/application-process diakses pada tanggal 12 April 2021.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2021