¹Sri Endah Wahyuningsih,² Kusuma Putra,³ Gunarto,⁴ Muchamad Iksan

¹Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang, Indonesia

²Doctoral Program Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia

³Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang, Indonesia

⁴Faculty of Law, Muhammadiyah Surakarta University, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i8-37

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

As a state of law as well as a democratic state, Indonesia guarantees and protects the right to freely express opinions and the right to organize in society. This in the end becomes the basis for every member of the community to be free to establish an Ormas. The freedom to establish these mass organizations in its development is not controlled due to the absence of real government control and supervision. This has resulted in many mass organizations being born into thugs and illegal organizations. This study aims to analyse the current system of supervision of mass organizations in Indonesia, the weaknesses in the current implementation of mass organizations, and the ideal reconstruction of a system of supervision of mass organizations capable of realizing a just law of mass organizations. The research in this dissertation uses the sociological juridical method. As for the results of the research conducted, it can be found that the current implementation of normative supervision has not been effective, as evidenced by the large number of problematic and prohibited mass organizations, weaknesses in the supervision of mass organizations in the community due to a legal vacuum in the regulation of supervision of mass organizations, so it is necessary to reconstruct values by conducting supervision and education. regarding the goals of mass organizations and the goals of the state and nation as well as legal reconstruction in the form of adding provisions for the supervision of mass organizations in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2017.

KEYWORDS

Justice, Community Organization, Supervision, Reconstruction.

REFERENCES

1) R. Kurniaty, “The Right to Democracy Arrangement Under International Law,” 1997.

2) UUD NRI 1945, “UUD NRI 1945.”

3) C. Suwartono, U. K. Indonesia, and A. Jaya, “Value orientation scale: the validation of the pancasila scale,” pp. 175–184, 2011.

4) B. R. Bellamy and G. L. Journal, “Special Issue: Constitutional Reasoning Democracy as Public Law: The Case of Constitutional Rights,” vol. 38, no. 1964, 2012.

5) M. D. Kristiana, “P OLITICS OF L AW ON S CHOOL D AYS P OLICY: L EGAL R EFORM ON I NDONESIAN E DUCATION,” vol. 1, no. 23, pp. 5–24, 2020.

6) B. E. Macdonald, “International Law, Democratic Governance and September the 11th,” vol. 31, 2002.

7) J. Pyo, “International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice The impact of jury experience on perception of the criminal prosecution system,” Int. J. Law Crime Justice., vol. 52, no. April 2017, pp. 176–184, 2018.

8) I. K. Tuzun and R. A. Kalemci, “Journal of Managerial Psychology Emerald Article: Organizational and supervisory support in relation to employee turnover intentions,” no. June 2012, 2015.

9) U. N. Huda, “The Position and Authority of the Election Supervisory Board in Indonesian Constitutional System,” vol. 06, no. 2, pp. 71–82, 2019.

10) E. Nahartyo and. H., “Magnitude of Corruption, Rationalization, and Internal Control Quality: An Experimental Study on Subsequent Offense,” J. Akunt. dan Keuang. Indones., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 164–179, 2018.

11) L. Guo and K. Cheng, “The relationship between abusive supervision and unethical pro-organizational behavior: linear or curvilinear?” no. April, 2020.

12) J. Klabbers, D. Lustig, A. Nollkaemper, S. Nouwen, and H. H. Joseph, “Democracy Revisited: Introduction to the Symposium,” vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2021.

13) S. E. Wahyuningsih, I. D. P. G. A. Danujaya, and M. Iksan, “Policy of criminal sanctions against corporations using illegal foreign workers in Indonesia,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 166–182, 2020.

14) I. Rimbawan, G. a, and S. Wahyuningsih, “Ideal Reconstruction of Crime Liability of Underage Drivers Causing the Loss of Life of Others Based on Values of Justice.,” Int. J. Adv. Res., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 2107–2115, 2017.

15) S. E. Wahyuningsih, A. R. Purba, and M. Mahardi, “LEGAL PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AS VICTIMS OF PEDOFILIA IN INDONESIA,” vol. 97, no. 24, pp. 71–84, 2014.

16) A. Matsukawa and S. Tatsuki, “International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Crime prevention through community empowerment: An empirical study of social capital in Kyoto , Japan,” Int. J. Law Crime Justice., no. xxxx, pp. 1–13, 2018.

17) S. Isra, Yuliandri, F. Amsari, and H. Tegnan, “Obstruction of justice in the effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia,” Int. J. Law, Crime Justice, vol. 51, pp. 72–83, 2017.

18) D. Sudaryanti, E. G. Sukoharsono, Z. Baridwan, and A. D. Mulawarman, “Critical Analysis on Accounting Information Based on Pancasila Value,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 172, pp. 533–539, 2015.

19) R. A. Wibowo, “When anti-corruption norms lead to undesirable results: learning from the Indonesian experience,” Crime, Law Soc. Chang., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 383–396, 2018.

20) N. T. Martoredjo, “Building Character Through Pancasila Values to Sovereign Nation,” Humaniora, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 116, 2016.

21) S. E. Wahyuningsih, “URGENSI PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA MATERIEL INDONESIA BERDASARKAN NILAI – NILAI KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA,” pp. 17–23.

22) J. H. E. Sitorus, “Pancasila-based Social Responsibility Accounting,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 219, pp. 700–709, 2016.

23) K. L. Zellars, B. J. Tepper, and M. K. Duffy, “Abusive Supervision and Subordinates’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” no. May, 2014.

24) H. Yogi Prabowo, “To be corrupt or not to be corrupt: Understanding the behavioral side of corruption in Indonesia,” J. Money Laund. Control, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 306–326, 2014.

25) I. K. Seregig, T. Suryanto, B. Hartono, E. Rivai, and E. Prasetyawati, “Preventing the acts of corruption through legal community education,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 138–159, 2018.

26) M. K. Shoss, R. Eisenberger, S. L. D. Restubog, and T. J. Zagenczyk, “Blaming the Organization for Abusive Supervision: The Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Supervisor’ s Organizational Embodiment,” vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 158–168, 2013.

27) R. Wahyudi, “Illegal Journey: The Indonesian Undocumented Migrant Workers to Malaysia,” Populasi, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 24, 2018.

28) A. Ahmed, “International Law of the Sea: An Overlook and Case Study,” Beijing Law Rev., vol. 08, no. 01, pp. 21–40, 2017.

29) L. Tibaka and R. Rosdian, “The Protection of Human Rights in Indonesian Constitutional Law after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia,” Fiat Justisia, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 268–289, 2018.

30) S. Fouladvand, “International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Decentering the prosecution-oriented approach: Tackling both supply and demand in the struggle against human tra ffi cking,” Int. J. Law Crime Justice., vol. 52, no. May 2017, pp. 129–143, 2018.

31) S. Adjorlolo and H. C. (Oliver) Chan, “Risk assessment of criminal offenders in Ghana: An investigation of the discriminant validity of the HCR-20V3,” Int. J. Law Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. June, p. 101458, 2019.

32) C. Joseph Joseph, J. Gunawan, Y. Sawani, M. Rahmat, J. Avelind Noyem, and F. Darus, “A comparative study of anti corruption practice disclosure among Malaysian and Indonesian Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) best practice companies,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 112, pp. 2896–2906, 2016.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 08 August 2021