VOlUME 05 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2022
1Junaidi,2 Sri Endah Wahyuningsih,3 Gunarto
1Doctoral Program Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
2,3Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
In the Indonesian constitution it is stated that the State of Indonesia is a state of law, this is evidenced by the existence of a State Administrative Court which aims to prevent abuse of the authority of public officials, but the implementation of the PTUN decisions does not yet have firmness because there is no coercive effort for public officials who are declared wrong in implementing the policy. The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the regulations as well as the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court that apply in Indonesia and analyze the weaknesses that affect the execution of the decisions of the State Administrative Court. The method in this is non-doctrinal, using primary data obtained by conducting interviews and secondary data by conducting a literature study, the results of the research are then analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Because Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the State Administrative Court confirms not to carry out the execution of the PTUN decision. The weakness lies in the legal substance of Article 97 number (9) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 concerning the State Administrative Court, which has not regulated threats to officials who do not carry out the provisions as stated in the decision of the State Administrative Court. And the weakness in Article 116 has not regulated the amount of forced money sanctions. While the legal structure factor is the absence of further legal remedies because the implementation of the PTUN decision depends on the awareness of the relevant officials. These weaknesses have led to a loss of public confidence in the PTUN decision, so it is necessary to reconstruct Article 97 point (9) and Article 116 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 concerning the State Administrative Court.
KEYWORDS:Execution, administrative court, decision, reconstruction, law
REFERENCES
1) S. Sunaryo, “Formal genus of the value of justice in Indonesia,” Leg. J. Ilm. Huk., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 223–236, 2021.
2) A. G. Herdiansah, W. S. Sumadinata, U. Padjajaran, and U. Padjajaran, “Indonesia’s political culture in the new digital age: A preliminary discussion Budaya politik Indonesia di era digital baru: Suatu diskusi pendahuluan,” pp. 378–389, 2012.
3) S. E. Wahyuningsih, “The Development of the Indonesian Criminal Code Derived From the Yudicial Pardon Value In Islamic Law,” vol. 11, no. 2, 2017.
4) I. Rumadan, “Interpretation of the Legal Values and Justice in the Living Law Related To Court Decision,” Sociol. Jurisprud. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2021.
5) D. Rahmat, T. Prasetyo, and S. E. Wahyuningsih, “Reconstruction of Advocate Policy in Assisting Child Cases Based on Value of Justice (A Study in Kuningan District),” UNIFIKASI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 85, 2018.
6) S. E. Wahyuningsih, N. Adi, and M. Iksan, “The role of scientific testimony in the process of investigation of crime in Indonesia,” pp. 97–103, 2018.
7) D. Rahmat, “The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Illegal Logging Based on the Value of Justice,” UNIFIKASI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 28, 2020.
8) R. Adawiyah and U. Rozah, “Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System with Pancasila Perspective as an Open Justice System,” Law Reform, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 2020.
9) K. R. Lutfi and R. A. Putri, “Optimalisasi Peran Bantuan Hukum Timbal Balik dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–57, 2020.
10) M. N. Winata, N. Jesica, and L. Septiyati, “The Realization Of Social Justice For The Poor Citizens According To Legal Philosophy,” FIAT JUSTISIAJurnal Ilmu Huk., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 284, 2018.
11) S. E. Wahyuningsih, “The implementation of legal protection against children who commit criminal acts in the judicial process in Indonesia,” Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1097–1110, 2020.
12) Z. Zainuddin, “Restorative Justice Concept on Jarimah Qishas in Islamic Criminal Law,” J. Din. Huk., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 335, 2017.
13) M. A. Agus and A. Susanto, “The Optimization of the Role of Correctional Centers in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System,” J. Penelit. Huk. Jure, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 369, 2021.
14) A. Muhammad, “the Restorative Justice Approach to the Implementation of Children’S Criminal Justice System in Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Kaji. Keimigrasian, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 189–198, 2018.
15) M. A. Mahfud, “the Relevance of Ronald Dworkin’S Theory for Creating Agrarian Justice in Indonesia,” Yust. J. Huk., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 389, 2020.
16) D. Setyo, D. Putra, A. Munandar, and S. Hs, “Analysis of Cooperation Agreement on Hotel Development and Management (Study At Hotel Lian),” Int. J. Humanit. Relig. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2017, 2021.
17) S. E. Wahyuningsih, M. R. Srikusuma, and M. Iksan, “The efforts to utilize village funds in order to prevent criminal actions of corruption in Indonesia,” vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 246–251, 2021.