VOlUME 05 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2022
1 Dr. Ruth Dorot, 2Prof. Nitza Davidovitch
1,2Ariel University, Israel
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Over time, the live memories of survivors have disappeared, and it has become clear that the memory of the Jewish Holocaust could disappear entirely in the absence of institutional efforts to preserve it. The understanding that collective memory can be preserved only through proactive efforts led to the development of formal and informal curricula for Holocaust education. The main assumption is that Holocaust education has the potential to generate a moral transformation. In light of this conclusion the question is: What kind of changes do we seek and how should we accomplish them?
This study deals with a case study of one of the constitutive historical events of the 20th century: commemoration of the Holocaust. The study focuses on the Experiential Learning Method of educating about Holocaust remembrance and commemoration and about Holocaust monuments. Over the years memorial centers have been added, which contain additional monuments commemorating the story of a specific place and/or personal stories.
One of the currently customary methods of commemoration in Israel is the journey to Poland, to the labor, concentration, and death camps, to the various memorial sites and monuments. This journey is undertaken by young and old, groups and singles, from all over the world and particularly from Israel. Since many of those taking the journey are young people at an age when personal, national, and historical identity is formed, a time when the young acquire their educational values, it is particularly important to ascertain who is charged with passing on the beacon of memory. This leads to weighty questions regarding the identity of the guides who lead these journeys and the contents they choose to impart to the participants, the guidance sites, and the method of guidance. Who will tell the story? How will the story be told? What will remain of the story?
This study discusses in addition, a case study of guides from Israel charged with imparting this chapter of human history. In order to explore their impact, interviews were held with 47 guides, the large majority of whom are Israeli born, a majority academics, and many hold advanced degrees. The research findings indicate that they aim the commemoration beacon primarily at guidance sites in Poland. The study explored other diverse essential parameters regarding the profile of “guides to Poland” – where did they study? What is their personal affiliation with the subject? What is their position on the universal and Jewish narrative of the Holocaust?
In light of the interviews conducted, it appears that almost all of them have the necessary tools to convey the most complete and comprehensive educational message. Accordingly, this issue was explored and most of the guides reported that the most influential message of commemoration is conveyed primarily through visits to camps and ghettos in Poland. This conclusion generates a theoretical, practical, philosophical, moral, and educational question indicating the “exporting of historical memory”. Should our entire educational focus indeed be exclusively on Poland? How can we preserve the ethos of the affiliation between the Holocaust of the Jews and heroism in the Holocaust, as well as heroism in Israel and its building, if we disregard the many commemoration and memorial sites within Israel? Do the journeys to the camps and to the valley of death in Poland, which are led by these guides, not create a distortion in the instilling of Holocaust remembrance and heritage, by disregarding the many commemoration sites and monuments throughout Israel? Aiming the beacon of commemoration at Poland, outside Israel, prevents exposure of the public, and particularly teenagers, to the natural association formed in Israel between Holocaust and revival, which preserves the connecting link between the generations.
REFERENCES
1) Arad, Y. & Gutman, Y. (1978). Documents in the Holocaust. Pp. 344-346. [in Hebrew]
2) Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum. The attendance record. Retrieved May 20th 2020 from:
http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=728&Itemid=8
3) Azaryahu, M. (2020). State cults: Celebrating independence and commemorating the fallen in Israel 1948-1956. Sde Boker: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. [in Hebrew]
4) Book of Laws (August 28, 1953). Vol. 132, pp. 144-145. [in Hebrew]
5) Brutin, B. (2005). Living with Memory. Beit Lohamei Hagetaot. [in Hebrew]
6) Davidovitch, N. & Dorot, R. (2020). Interdisciplinary instruction: Between art and literature. International Journal of Higher Education (IJHE), 9(3), 269-278. ISSN: 1927-6044
7) Davidovitch, N. Haskel, A., & Soen, D. (2015). Witnesses in Uniform – A multi-annual perspective of IDF delegations to Poland. In N. Davidovitch & D. Soen (Eds.), The valley of the shadow of death: The Holocaust experience from a multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 107–128). Tel Aviv: Resling. (in Hebrew).
8) Davidovitch, N. & Lewin, E. (2019). The Polish-Jewish lethal polka dance. Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 10(2), 15-31.
9) Even Shoshan, A. (1974). Comprehensive Hebrew dictionary. Jerusalem. Entry: Monument (Andarta and matzeva). [in Hebrew]
10) Fontana, L. (2011). Rethinking school trips to Auschwitz. A case study of Italian memorial trains: Deterioration of Holocaust pedagogy In N. Davidovitch & D. Soen (Eds.), The valley of the shadow of death: The Holocaust experience from a multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 107–128). Tel Aviv: Resling. (in Hebrew).
11) Gebirtig, M. (1938). Translated from Yiddish by Avraham Levinson. Only remnants of walls will testify to what had been here. National Library. Retrieved from: https://www.facebook.com/NationalLibraryIsrael/posts/2902729939773358 [in Hebrew]
12) Gretz, N. (1995). Captive of a dream. Tel Aviv: Sifriat Ofakim, Am Oved. [in Hebrew]
13) Grossman, H. (2005). March of the living. Kesher Ayin, 147, 12-14. [in Hebrew]
14) Halbwachs, M. (1950/1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15) Kashti, O. (March 22, 2010). Apart from “pornography of evil”, studying the technical details of the Holocaust has no value. Ha’aretz. [in Hebrew]
16) Knesset Annals (April 12, 1951), Vol. 9, pp. 1655-1657. [in Hebrew]
17) Kovner, A. (1990). On the narrow bridge, p. 17. [in Hebrew]
18) Liebman, C.S. & Don-Yehiya, E. (1983). Civil religion in Israel. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19) Ofrat, G. (November 1982). On the monument and the obligation of place. Kav, 4-5, 58. [in Hebrew]
20) Ofrat, G. (2011). Identity, memory, culture. Gideon Ofrat’s Storeroom. [in Hebrew]
21) Resnik, J. (2003). Sites of memory of the Holocaust: Shaping national memory of the education system in Israel. Nations and Nationalism, 9, 297-317.
22) Second World War. Ynet. Retrieved on May 20, 2011, from: http://www.ynet.co.il/yaan/0,7340,L-23955 MjM5NTVfNDc4MDI0MjZfMTQ4Njg3MjAw-FreeYaan,00.html [in Hebrew]
23) Stauber, R. (2000). Lessons for this generation: Holocaust and heroism in Israeli public discourse in the 1950s. Jerusalem: Yad Ben Zvi. [in Hebrew]
24) Wiesel, E. (2005). Speech at the United Nations assembly on International Holocaust Day.
25) Yablonka, H. (1998). Holocaust survivors in Israel – Initial summaries. Bishvil Hazikaron, 27. Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, Central School of Holocaust Instruction. [in Hebrew]
26) Yablonka, H. (2001). The State of Israel vs. Adolf Eichmann. Tel Aviv, pp. 180-192, 245. [in Hebrew]
27) Young, E.J. (1993). The Texture of Memory. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, p. 168.
28) Young, E. J. (1996). Germany’s disappearing memorials. In I. Gutman (Ed.), Major Changes within the Jewish People in the wake of the Holocaust (pp. 595-602). Jerusalem: Yad Vashem. [in Hebrew]
29) Zelizer, B. (1995). Reading the past against the grain: The shape of memory studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12(2), pp 214-239.
30) Zerubavel, Y. (2002). The 'mythological Sabra' and Jewish past: Trauma, memory, and contested identities. Israel Studies, 7, 115-144.