VOlUME 05 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2022
Legal Protection of Traditional Knowledge (Comparative Study of Bangladesh, Australia and Indonesia)
1Andi Tyas Tri Wibowo,2Joko Setiyono
Master of Law, Universitas Diponegoro,Street Imam Bardjo No. 1, Pleburan, South Semarang, Central Java, 5024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-27Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
One field that is loaded with IPRs is Traditional Knowledge. Traditional knowledge (traditional knowlegde) is included in the scope of intellectual work originating from ideas, ideas, or discoveries of community groups of a country. As time goes on, it is important that Traditional Knowledge be protected. Especially the protection of IPR laws against traditional knowledge itself. Legal protection This traditional knowledge is in fact not only done in developing countries but also in developed countries. In this paper, the authors are interested in discussing the comparison of traditional knowledge legal protection in several countries, such as Bangladesh, Australia and Indonesia. The research method used in this paper uses normative juridical. The discussion in this paper will be divided into two, namely the concept of understanding traditional knowledge as intellectual property and a comparison of legal protection for traditional knowledge in Bangladesh, Australia, and Indonesia.
KEY WORDS:IPR; Traditional Knowledge; Bangladesh, Australia and Indonesia.
REFERENCES
1) Umar, A. (2011). Perjanjian TRIPs dan Beberapa Isu Strategis. Jakarta – Bandung: Badan Penerbit FH UI dan PT. Alumni.
2) Maskus, K. (2010). Intellectual Property Rights in Global Economy. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics
3) Purba, A. (2005). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pasca TRIPS. Bandung : PT. Alumni.
4) Nurachmad, M. (2010). Segala tentang HAKI Indonesia, Jogjakarta: Buku Biru.
5) Sardjono, Agus. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual & Pengetahuan Tradisional. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
6) Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
7) Riswadi, B. (2005) Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
8) Atmasasmita, R. (2000). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
9) Swantoro, H. (2017). Harmonisasi Keadilan dan Kepastian Dalam Peninjauan Kembali. Depok: Pranadamedia Group.
10) Marzuki, P. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
11) Soemitro, P. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
12) Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamudji, Sri. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
13) Koentjoroningrat. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
14) Mulyana, D. (2006). Komunikasi Antar Budaya: Paduan Berkomunikasi Dengan Orang-Orang Berbeda Budaya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
15) Hadikusuma, H. (2010). Pengantar Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Mandar Maju.
16) Purba, A. (2005). “TRIP's-WTO dan Hukum HKI Indonesia (Kajian Perlindungan Hak Cipta Seni Batik Tradisional Indonesia”. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
17) Barr, Payton, J,J.F. R. & Sillitoe. (1996) Preliminary investigation of Agricultural Diversification and farmers Practices in Bangladesh Floodplain Production Systems Involving Rice-Fish Production. U.K. University Of Newcastle: Centre for land Use and Water resources Research.
18) Md, Khan & S.K., Choudhury. (2014). Traditional Medicine in Bangladesh. Traditional Medicine in Asia. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional office for south East Asia.
19) Graham, Dixie, Ali, Imam & Jahangir, Hussain. (2003). Medicinal Plant Marketing In Bangladesh. South Asia: Enterprise Development Facility, World Bank Group, International Finance Cooperation.
20) Wright, Evana, Cahill, Ann and Stoianoff, Natalie. (2016). Australia And Indigenous Traditional Knowledge. Sidney: Spi-Stoianoff - Indigenous Knowledge Forum.
21) Davis, M. (1997). Biological Diversity and Indigenous Knowledge, Australia: Parliament of Australia.
22) Australian Human Rights Commission. (2009) Native Title Report Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner 2008. Sidney: Australian Human Rights Commission.
23) Sentina, Maiko, Mason, Elizabeth, & Janke, Terri. (2018). Legal protection of Indigenous Knowledge in Australia Supplementary Paper 1. Sidney: IP Australia and the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science.
1) Rongiyati, S. (2011). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual atas Pengetahuan Tradisional, Jurnal Negara Hukum: Vol. 2 (No. 2, November), p. 214.
2) Rohaini. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan Tradisional Melalui Pengembangan Sui Generis Law. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 9 (No. 4, Oktober-Desember), p. 431.
3) Saleh, G. (2010). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengetahuan Tradisional di Negara-negara Berkembang Khususnya Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, Vol. III (No. 1), p. 2.
4) Aryanto, H. (2014). Pemanfaatan Pengetahuan Tradisional Indonesia Berdasarkan Potensi Daerah Sebagai Modal Pembangunan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun ke-44 No.2 (April-Juni), p. 296-297.
5) Eimer, T. (2013). Global Wordings And Local Meanings: The Regulation Of Traditional Knowledge In India And Brazil. Journal Für Entwicklungspolitik, Vol. XXIX (No. 2), p. 36.
6) Atsar, A. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan Dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan Dan Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Law Reform Vol. 13 (No 2), p. 289.
7) Bandyopadhyay, Ratna dan Majumder, Krishnapada. (2012). Organising Traditional Knowledge for Inclusive Development : Role of Libraries. Bangladesh Journal of Library and Information Science Vol. 1 (No. 2), p. 5.
8) M, Mohammed & M K, Alam. (2011). Opportunities of traditional knowledge in natural resource management experiences from the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, Vol 10 (No. 3), p. 477.
9) Rahaman, M. (2015). Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Bangladesh. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Vol 20 (May), p. 166.
10) Roisah, K. (2014). Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dalam Sistem Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual. Jurnal MMIH Jilid 43 (No. 3 Juli), p. 372-373.
11) Roisah, K. (2012). Prismatika Hukum Sebagai Dasar Pembangunan Hukum. Jurnal MMH Jilid 41 (No. 4), p. 624.
12) Mahila, S. (2010). Traditional Knowledge Dalam Sistem Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Indonesia, Jurnal Lex Specialis, Edisi Khusus Agustus, p. 36.
13) Sofyarto, K. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum HKI atas Pengetahuan Tradisional terhadap Manfaat Ekonomi. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 (No. 1 April), p. 154-155.
14) Rafian, Laina & Sabrina, Qoliqina. (2014). Perlindungan bagi 'Kustodian' Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Nadran Menurut Hukum Internasional dan Implementasinya dalam Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unpad, Vol. 1 (No. 3), p. 499-450.