VOlUME 05 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2022
1Suparlin,2Mustaji,3Andi Mariono,4Fajar Arianto
1,2,3,4Teknologi Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia & Address
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-29Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of using e-learning on reading comprehension among high school students in learning English. The quantitative approach used in this study was developed using a quasi-experimental approach. The method used in this study is quasi-experimental. The data analysis technique used in this study is to compare the two groups which are calculated statistically. As a result of the analytical test, the effect of e-learning on reading comprehension of the control group and experimental high school students was recognized at the 5% significance level (0.000 < 0.05). The data shows that reading comprehension increases in the experimental class that applies e-learning. This study concludes that reading comprehension in learning English is better in the experimental group than in the control group. The use of e-learning has a positive influence on reading comprehension for high school students.
KEY WORDS:E-learning, reading comprehension, evaluation, high school, foreign language
REFERENCES
1) Abbas Ali Zarei, M. A. (2019). The effect of online learning tools on l2 reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) , 212-234.
2) Alexander, S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43(May), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910110399247.
3) Al-Fadda, H. a.-Y. (2010). Using web blogs as a tool to encourage pre-class reading, post-class reflections and collaboration in higher education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, 100-106.
4) Almelhi, D. A. (2014). Effects of teaching argumentative reading and writing by integration in an e-learning environment on literacy development in EFL college students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science , 85-102.
5) Alu, N. C. (2011). Utilizing e-learning in science and technology education problems and prospects. In Onyegegbu, O. and Eze, U. (Eds)Optimizing elearning opportunities for effective education service delivery. Nsukka: A Publication of the Institute of Education, University of Nigeria.
6) Anderson, O. W. (2015). Kerangka Landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran dan asesmen. Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
7) Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions.In Handbook of Distance Education. USA: Eds.;Lawrence Erlbaum:Mahwah.
8) Barbour, M. K. (2019). The Landscape of K-12 Online Learning: Examining What Is Known. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 521-542). Routledge.
9) Barnett, R. &. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press & McGraw Hill Education.
10) Barrington, E. ( 2004). Teaching to student diversity in higher education: How multiple intelligence theory can help. Teaching to student diversity in higher education: HoTeaching in Higher Education, , 421–434. doi:10.1080/1356251042000252363.
11) Behjat, F. (2011). Reading through interaction: From individualistic reading comprehension to collaboreading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 239-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.239-244 .
12) Braine, G. (1994). Starting ESL classes in freshman writing programs. TESOL Journal, 3(4), 22-25.
13) Bridgeman, B. &. (1984). Survey of academic writing tasks. Written Communication, 1(2), 247-280.
14) Brunner, D. L. (2007). Using “Hybrid” effectively on Christian higher education. Christian Scholar’s Review, 36(2), 115.
15) Budi Santoso, H. (2007). Pemodelan personalisasi Pembelajaran berdasarkan Aspek Gaya Belajar pada student centered e-learning environment. University of Indonesia: Faculty of Computer Science , Master Thesis.
16) Cai, H. (2012). E-learning and English Teaching. IERI Procedia 2, 841 – 846.
17) Calet, N. P.-M.-R. (2019). Overcoming reading comprehension difficulties through a prosodic reading intervention: A single-case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659019826252.
18) Casanave, C. &. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research . English for Special Purposes, 11(1), 33-49.
19) Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37-46.
20) Cooper, T. &. (2017). Communities.of inquiry in curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths and.limitations in context. . (2017). Communities.of inquiry in curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths andAustralasian Journal of Educational Technology, (2017). Communities.of inquiry in curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths and33(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3026.
21) Dabbagh, N. &.-R. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies and application. NJ: Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River .
22) Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the language learner. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23) Ehrman, M. E. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313-330.
24) Eiggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Indeks.
25) Elsenheimer, J. (2006). Got Tools? The blended learning analysis and design expediter. Centre for Integrative Learning Performance Improvement, 45(8), 26 https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930450806.
26) English, M. P. (2019). Building a Community of Inquiry in Online Library Instruction: The CoI Framework Applied. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2019.1575319.
27) Esin Ergün, F. B. (2020). Exploring the Predictive Role of E-Learning Readiness and E-Learning Style on Student Engagement. openpraxis, 175–189 . DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1072.
28) Fageeh, A., & Mekheimer, M. A. (2013). Effects of Blackboard on EFL Academic Writing and Attitudes. JALT CALL Journal, 169-196.
29) Farooq, U. M. (2012). Attitude of students towards e-learning: A study of english language learners at Taif university english language centre. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, Retrieve April 25 http://connection.ebscohost.com.
30) Fatemeh Behjat, M. Y. (2012). Blended Learning: A Ubiquitous Learning Environment for Reading Comprehension . International Journal of English Linguistics, 97-106.
31) Fraenkel, J. a. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, inc.
32) Gabarre, e. a. (2014). iPads in the foreign language classroom A learner’s perspective. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 20 (1).
33) Gough, P. B. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 7(1) 6–10.
34) Graham, S. J. (2004). Giving up on modern foreign languages? Students’perceptions of learning French. New York: The Modern Language Journal.
35) Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. The voice of evidence in reading research: . In. P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.).
36) Hamilton, S. (1994). Freedom Transformed: Toward a Developmental Model for The Construction of Collaborative Learning Enviroment. The Construction of Collaborative Learning Enviroments, 93-101.
37) Hedge, N. a. (2004). Reading roles: University e-Learning contributing to life-long learning in networked world. www.nationamaster.com.
38) Hediyeh Motaghian, A. H. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors' adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computers & Education, 61(1), 158-167.
39) Ismail, H., Rahmat, A., & Emzir. (2020). The Effect of Moodle E-Learning Material on EFL Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 120-129.
40) Kai Ruggeri, C. F. (2013). A global model for effective use and evaluation of e-learning in health. Telemed J E Health, 19(4):312-21.
41) Khaloufi, A.-e. &. (2017). An Examination of the Impact of Computer Skills on the Effective Use of ICT in the Classroom. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 2(1).
42) Khoza, S., & Biyela, A. (2020,25). Decolonising Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of First Year Mathematics Students. Educ.inf.Technol, 2665-2679.
43) Lee, Y. H. (2013). The indirect effects of online social entertainment and information seeking activities on reading literacy. Computers & Education, 168-177.
44) Louis Cohen, L. M. (2011). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
45) Maryam Babapour, S. A. (2018). The effect of shadow reading and collaborativestrategic reading on EFL learners’ readingcomprehension across two proficiency levels. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-13.
46) Masgoret, A. M. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Conducted By Gardner and Associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 123-163.
47) Muhammad Asy'ari, M. I. (2019). The Effectiveness of inquiry learning model in improving Prospective Teachers' metacognition knowledge and metacognition awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 455-470.
48) Nwokike, F. (2010). Accounting education for sustainable entrepreneurship. International Technology Education Journal, 1(1), 57-63.
49) Parodi, G. (2003). Relaciones entre lectura y escritura: Unaperspectiva cognitive discursiva [Relationships between reading and writing: Discursive and cognitive perspectives. Valparaı´so: Editorial Universitaria de Valparaı´so.
50) Poorahmadi, M. (2010). The effect of employing scaffolding strategies and classroom tasks in teaching reading comprehension. The Journal of TEFLL, 1(3), 107-118.
51) Ramirez-Arellano, A. B.-R.-S. (2019). Emotions motivation, cognitive–metacognitive strategies, and behavior as predictors of learning performance in blended learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57, 491-512.
52) Rohwer, A. M. (2017). E‐learning of evidence‐based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–147. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.4.
53) Saeheng, P. (2017). A Study of e-Learning, Blended learning, and Traditional Teaching Methods to Motivate Autonomous Learning in English Reading Comprehension of Thais Learners. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1-20.
54) Salimzadeh, R. &. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning strategy on reading comprehension of EFL learners. Yazd University , Iran: In the proceedings of the 7th International TELLSI Conference on New Horizons in Language Education.
55) Seble Frehywot, Y. V. (2013). E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries. Human Resources for Health, 1-15.
56) Semmar, Y. (2006). An exploratory study of motivational variables in a foreign language learning context. Journal of Language and Learning, 5(1), 118-132.
57) Senior, R. (2010). Connectivity: A framework for understanding effective language teaching in face-to-face and online learning communities. RELC Journal, 41(2), 137-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688210375775.
58) Sofyan A. Gani, Y. Q. (2016). Progressive outcomes of collaborative strategic reading to EFL learners. Elsevier B.V, 144-149.
59) Strang, R. (1972). Developing oral expression. In H. D. Funk and D. Triplett (Eds.)Elementary School: Readings. Philadelphia: J. P. Lippincott Company.
60) Szymańska, A. &. (2011). Reading efficiency in blended learning context. Teaching English with Technology, 11 (2) 29-42.
61) Teeley, K. H. (2007). Designing hybrid web-based courses for accelerated nursing students. Educational Innovations, 46( 9).
62) Thang, e. a. (2016). ICT Tools Patterns of Use among Malaysian ESL Undergraduates. GEMA Online, 16(1).
63) Tsai, C. (2008). The preferences toward constructivist internet-based learning environments among university students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 16-31.
64) Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
65) Wang, Q. (2010). Using online shared workspaces to support group collaborative learning. in Computers &Education, 55, 1270–1276.
66) Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal.
67) Yakuta, A. D. (2015). An experimental study on the effects of the use of blogs on EFL reading comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-16 , DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2015.1006634.
68) Yang, P.-L. (2016). In-Class Online Discussion Activities to Enhance EFL Learners’ English Self-Efficacy and Language Learning Strategies. ASIAN TEFL, 1(2).
69) Yukselturk, E. Y. (2008). Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students' satisfaction in an online certificate program. Educational Technology and Society, 11(4) 51-65.
70) Zhang, W. X. (2015). Exploring the impacts of cognitive and metacognitive prompting on students’ scientific inquiry practices within an e-learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 529-553.
71) Zhong, Y. (2008). A Study of Autonomy English Learning on the Internet. China: Foreign Language Department of Qinzhou University Qinzhou 535000.
72) Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 251-276.
73) Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 29-48.