¹Moch. Choirul Anam, ²Pujiyono

^1,2Master of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Imam Bardjo No. 1, Pleburan, South Semarang, Central Java, 50241

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-36

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to find out how the forms of legal breakthroughs are known in law enforcement practices in the application of elements detrimental to the state economy related to handling cases of criminal acts of corruption, is it possible?. This study uses a doctrinal juridical approach. The results of the study explain that in terms of both legal and formal in the form of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, legal doctrines and the existence of a judicial review decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 25/PUU-XIV/2016, Legal breakthroughs in the application of elements detrimental to the economy countries related to the handling of cases of criminal acts of corruption, can be held criminally accountable with criminal sanctions in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) or Article 3 of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption in an objective and casual manner. If there is an element of "harming the country's economy" in accordance with the provisions of criminal law, especially the eradication of corruption.

KEY WORDS:

legal breakthroughs, elements of harming the country's economy, handling corruption cases

REFERENCES

Books:
1) Van Apeldorn, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, PT Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1986

2) JE. Sahetapy, Kapita Selekta Kriminologi, Alumni, Bandung, 1979

3) Masruchin Ruba’I, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, UM PRESS, Malang, 2001

4) Satjipto Rahardjo, Membedah Hukum Progresif, Penerbit Kompas, Jakarta, 2007

5) Mahfud Kusuma, Melayani Semangat Hukum Progresif: Terapi Paradigmatik Atas Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, LSHP, Yogyakarta, 2009

6) Setiono, Pemahaman Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Surakarta, 2010 JOURNAL ARTICLE:
1) Johan Graf Lambsdorff, “Corruption In Empirical Research: A Review, Transparency”, International Working Paper, November 1999

2) David Jay Green, “Investment Behavior And The Economic Crisis In Indonesia”, Journal of Asian Economics, Volume 15, Nomor 2, April 2004

3) Lintong O. Siahaan, “Peran Hakim Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Di Indonesia: Hal-Hal Yang Harus Diketahui (Proses Berfikir) Hakim Agar Dapat Menghasilkan Putusan Yang Berkualitas”, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun Ke-36, Nomor 1, Januari-Maret 2006

4) Rizki Agung Firmansyah, “Konsep Kerugian Perekonomian Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurist-Diction, Volume 3, Nomor 2, Maret 2020

5) Trifena Julia Kambey, Tonny Rompis, Altje A. Musa, “Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Unsur Merugikan Perekonomian Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Lex Crimen, Volume IX, Nomor 3, Juli-September 2020

6) RB. Soemanto, Sudarto, Sudarsana, “Pemahaman Masyarakat Tentang Korupsi” Yustisia, Volume 3, Nomor 1, Januari- April 2014

7) M. Darin Arif Mu’allifin, “Problematika Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia”, AHKAM, Volume 3, Nomor 2, November 2015

8) Duwi Handoko, “Re-Evaluasi Proses Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesi”, Riau Law Journal, Volume 3, Nomor 2, November 2019

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2022