VOlUME 05 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2022
1Iskandar Iskandar, 2Ibrahim Latepo
1,2Faculty of Islamic Philosophy, Humanities, and Communications, Universitas Islam Negeri Datokarama Palu
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-39Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine the behavior of the preachers by using variables taken from previous research. This study uses a mixed method between quantitative and qualitative. Data were collected through a survey approach, focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews. The sample of this study was selected using a random sampling technique selected in several districts with a total of 90 samples. Surveys are shared online. The object of this research is the young preachers who enter the millennial generation and are active in lecturing. Quantitative data from the survey results were processed using a descriptive statistical approach, while the interview results were processed using a qualitative approach. The results of this study indicate that the variables of seeking information, hedonic behavior, close friendships, expanding friendships, and the behavior when spreading Islamic symbols have contributed significantly to the social behavior and lecturing of young lecturers in Central Sulawesi. This research contributes to the development of future da'wah strategies.
KEY WORDS:Muslim preachers, sense of community, sense of religion, Islamic preaching
REFERENCES
1) Achmad, Y. R. (2010). Dakwah Di Dunia Maya. from Wordpress http://ridwansyahyusufachmad.wordpress.com/2010/07/24/dakwah-di-dunia-maya/
2) Ahmad, F. I. (2014). Dakwah Online: Asyiknya Meraup Pahala di Dunia Maya. Bandung: Mizan.
3) Bernoff, J., & Li, C. (2008). Harnessing the power of the oh-so-social web. MIT Sloan Management Review, 493, 36-42.
4) Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
5) Brown, A. (2011). Relationships, community and identity in the new virtual society. The Futurist, Mar/Apr, 29-34.
6) Castells, M. (2004). The network society. A cross-cultural perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7) Davidson, C. (2011). We can’t ignore the influences of digital technologies The Digital Divide (pp. 166-171). Bauerlein, M., Ed., ed New York: Penguin.
8) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Users Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
9) De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in Social Research (5th Edition ed.). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
10) DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
11) Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and Privaci Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of FaceBook and MySpace. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2007 Proceedings. Retrieved from
12) Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook enabled communication practices. New Media Society, XX(X), 1-20.
13) Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
14) Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873-892. doi:10.1177/1461444810385389
15) Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
16) Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating Case Study and Survey Research Methods: An Example in Information Systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 112-126.
17) Ganesh, J., & Padmanabhuni, S. (2007). Web 2.0: Conceptual Framework and Research Directions. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2007 Proceedings. Retrieved from
18) Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
19) Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294-1318.
20) Guo, C., Li, B., & Tian, X. (2016). Flickr group recommendation using rich social media information. Neurocomputing, 204, 8-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.131
21) Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385-401. doi:10.1080/01972240290108195.
22) Hew, W. W. (2018). THE ART OF DAKWAH: social media, visual persuasion and the Islamist propagation of Felix Siauw. Indonesia and the Malay world, 46(134), 61-79. doi:10.1080/13639811.2018.1416757
23) Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(1), 45-60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1
24) Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010a). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
25) Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010b). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59 - 68.
26) Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
27) Kim, W., Jeong, O.-R., & Lee, S.-W. (2010). On social Web sites. Information Systems, 35(2), 215-236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2009.08.003
28) Kini, R. B. (2009). Adoption and Evaluation of Mobile Commerce in Chile. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 12(1), 75-88.
29) Kraut, R., Patterson,, Michael, L., Vicki, K., Sara, M., & Tridas, S. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
30) Kraut, R. S. B. J. V. A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49.
31) Latepo, I., Suharto, S., & Nurdin, N. (2021). Understanding Muslim Preaching Students’ Use of Social Media. International Journal of International Relations, Media and Mass Communication Studies, 7(1), 52-66.
32) Lee, S., & Cho, M. (2011). Social media use in a mobile broadband environment: examination of determinanats of Twitter and Facebook use. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 6(7), 2011, pp. 72-87., 6(7), 72-87.
33) Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
34) Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
35) Nawawi, H. (2004). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. . Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
36) Nurdin, N. (2014). To Dakwah Online or not to Dakwah Online. Da'i Dilemma in Internet Age. Al-Mishbah : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Dakwah, 10(1), 21-33.
37) Nurdin, N., Pettalongi, S. S., Askar, A., & Hamka, H. (2021). E-learning Adoption and Use Hype Cycle during Covid-19 Outbreak (A Longitudinal Survey). IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education), 5(2), 68-78.
38) Nurdin, N., Pettalongi, S. S., & Mangasing, M. (2019). Understanding Digital Skill Use from The Technology Continuance Theory (TCT). Paper presented at the 2019 6th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE).
39) Nurdin, N., & Rusli. (2013). Spiritualising New Media: The Use of Social Media for Da'wah Purposes within Indonesian Muslim Scholars. Jurnal Komunikasi islam, 3(1), 1-21.
40) O'Reilly, T. (2006). Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again. Retrieved 04 January 2011
41) O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved 04 January 2011 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008839&download=yes%22
42) Omar, F. I., Hassan, N. A., & Sallehuddin, I. S. (2015). Role of Social Media in Disseminating Dakwah (Peranan Media Sosial dalam Penyebaran Dakwah), Singapore.
43) Parameswaran, M., & Whinston, A. B. (2007). Research issues in social computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(6), 326-350.
44) Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
45) Pelling, E., & White, K. (2009). The theory of planned behaviour applied to young people’s use of social networking websites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 755-759.
46) Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13-32.
47) Rheingold. (2008). Virtual communities: Exchanging ideas through computer bulletin boards. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1), 1-5.
48) Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), 00-00. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.x
49) Ridwan, M., Nurdin, N., & Fitriningsih, F. (2019). Pengaruh Dakwah di Instagram Terhadap Perilaku Keagamaan Mahasiswa. Al-Mishbah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 15(2), 193-220.
50) Rusli, R., Hasyim, M. S., & Nurdin, N. (2021). A New Islamic Knowledge Production And Fatwa Rulings: How Indonesia’s Young Muslim Scholars Interact With Online Sources. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 14(2), 499-518.
51) Saniyah, N. (2012). Dakwah Islam Melalui Facebook: Studi terhadap Materi Dakwah Update Status dan Comment Facebooker Pada Grup “Komunitas Muslim Indonesia. (Skripsi), Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Walisongo, Semarang.
52) Scheepers, H., Scheepers, R., Stockdale, R., & Nurdin, N. (2014). THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN SOCIAL MEDIA USE. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(2), 25-34.
53) Wang, Z., & Scheepers, H. (2012). Understanding the intrinsic motivations of user acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems: Towards a unified research model. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30(1).
54) Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
55) Wellman, B. (2005). Community: from neighborhood to network. Commun. ACM, 48(10), 53–55. doi:10.1145/1089107.1089137
56) Wigand, R. T., Wood, J. D., & Mande, D. M. (2010). Taming the Social Network Jungle: From Web 2.0 to Social Media. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2010 Proceedings.
57) Wise, K., Alhabash, S., & Park, H. (2010). Emotional Responses During Social Information Seeking on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(5), 555-562. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0365
58) Yaros, R. A. (2011). Social Media in Education: Effects of Personalization and Interactivity on Engagement and Collaboration. In H. S. N. Al-Deen & J. A. Hendricks (Eds.), Social Media: Usage and Impact (pp. 328). London: Lexington Books.
59) Zhang, P., Li, T., Ge, R., & Yen, D. C. (2012). A theoretical acceptance model for computer-based communication media: Nine field studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1805-1815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.022