¹Edison Bonartua Hutapea,²Yuli Marlina

¹Universitas Paramadina

²Universitas Islam Jakarta

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i11-27

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The phenomenon of the Yamaha mio Soul fan community is one of the two-wheeled vehicle organizations that can continue to survive and continue to develop its positive organization so that it can be recognized by symbolic communication activities that run in an Independent Soul Fans community in Jakarta. In its establishing relationships between members with a phenomenological approach. The purpose of the study was to determine the communication of verbal and nonverbal symbols in the Soul Independent Fans community in Jakarta on building intimacy and fostering relationships among members. The research method used is a qualitative method. Basic Theory used Symbolic Interactionism. The results of this study are the use of verbal symbols using verbal symbols when conveying suggestions and conveying things to members through conversations or meetings, usually if the verbal is often conveyed by the general chairman and regional head in each meeting (kopdar), verbal symbols are often used in when they gather or open a forum to talk with fellow FSI members. It can be understoon about where to know and get communication codes and symbols, all informants gave uniform comments, knew the codes and symbols from other communities on the road to the group when were driving, paying attention to the movement of the symbols shown to them. From this study it can be concluded that the use of communication symbols will be seen by the system around it, because the values or norms of society is a standard in the treatment of community members which serves to maintain the stability of the internal interactions of community members, symbols as signs that refer to certain objects outside the sign itself. . The relationship between a symbol as a signifier and something that is signified (signed by a sign) is conventional.

KEYWORDS:

Symbolic Interaction, Self-Concept, Phenomenology

REFERENCES

1) Bungin, Burhan, 2003, Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif , Aktualisasi Metodologis Kearah Ragam varian Kontenporer, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

2) Bungin, Burhan, 2007, Sosiologi Komunikasi, Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta.

3) Blake, Reed H dan Haroldsen, Edwin. 1987. A Taxonomy of Concepts in Communication, Hasting House, Publishers. New York

4) Effendy, Onong Uchjana. Ilmu, Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.

5) ------, Onong Uchjana. Dimensi - Dimensi Komunikasi, Bandung : Alumni, 1981.

6) Cresswell, John W, 2003, Research Design Qualitative – Quantitative and Mixed Metkods Approachs, Sage Publication, London

7) Littlejohn. Stephen W. 2002, Theories of Human Communication. Second Edition. Wadworth Publishing Company. California.

8) Mappiare, Andi. Psikologi Remaja. Surabaya : Usaha Nasional, 1982.

9) Moleong, Lexy,J, 1993, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung

10) Pratikto, Riyono. Berbagai Aspek Ilmu Komunikasi. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakaiya, 1987.

11) Quail, Denis Me dan Windahl, Sven. Model - Model Komunikasi. terjemahan Putu Laxrnan Pendit. Jakarta : Uni Prirnas, 1985.

12) Rakhmat, Jalaludin, Metode Pene;itian Komunikasi, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung, 2002.

13) -----. Psikologl Komunikasi. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakaiya, 1994. Singarimbun,

14) Susanto, Astrid. S. Komunikasi Dalam Teori dan Praktek I. Bandung Bina Cipta, 1977.

15) Sobur, Alex, 2003, Semiotika Komunikasi, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2022