¹Edison Hutapea, ²Sri Desti Purwatiningsih

¹Universitas Paramadina, Jalan Gatot Subroto No.Kav. 97, Mampang Prapatan

²Universitas Nasional, Jalan Sawo Manila No 61 Pasar Minggu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i11-04

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research was conducted to find out whether tutoring followed by street children can form a positive self-concept, full of confidence, courtesy, and friendly, not harming themselves and the surrounding environment, so that the views of family, friends, neighbors, and the community can accept the self-concept. The street children. This study uses the phenomenological tradition, and the theory used in this research is the theory of symbolic interaction, where this theory looks at the social reality created by humans themselves through the interaction of meanings conveyed symbolically. This type of qualitative research uses direct observation and data collection techniques through in-depth interviews. The data validity technique used is data triangulation. The results of this study show that the self-concept of street children before and after receiving tutoring looks different from the pattern of thinking, character, insight, self-concept and how to interact with other people.

KEYWORDS:

Self Concept, Street Children, Mindset, Symbolic Interaction.

REFERENCES

1) Berger, Athur Asa. 2000a. Media Analisis Techniques. Second Edition. Alibahasa Setio Budi HH. Yogyakarta: Penerbitan Universitas Atma Jaya.

2) Budyatna, Muhammad. & Ganiem, Leila Mona. 2011. Teori Komunikasi Antarpribadi. Jakarta: Kencana.

3) Bungin, Burhan. 2001. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grapindo Persada.

4) Effendy, Onong Uchjana. 2007. Ilmu Komunikasi (Teori dan Praktek). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

5) Giddens, Anthony. 1993. Sociology. Polity Press.

6) Hartoko, Dick & B. Rahmanto. 1998. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Yogyakarta: kanisius.

7) Herdiana, Ike. 2012. Dunia Anak Jalanan. Surabaya: Penerbit Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

8) Herusatoto, Budiono. 2000. Simbolisme dalam Budaya Jawa. Yogyakarta: Hanindita Graha Widia.

9) Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus Linguistik. Edisi ketiga. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

10) Kushartati, Sri. (2004). Pemberdayaan Anaka Jalanan. Indonesia Psychologycal Journal¸2(1), 45-54.

11) LittleJohn, Stephen. W. 2014. Teori Komunikasi :Theories Of Human Communication, edisi ke-9. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

12) Moeliono, Laurike dan Dananto, Adi. 2004. Pendampingan Anak Jalanan Menurut Para Pendamping Anak Jalanan. Jakarta: PKPM Unika Atmajaya.

13) Moleong, Lexy. J. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. cetakan ke – 17. Bandung: PT. REMAJA ROSDAKARYA.

14) Morissan. 2013. Teori Komunikasi Individu Hingga Masa. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

15) Mulyana, Deddy 2001. Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarya

16) Narbuko, Cholid & Achmadi, H. Abu, 2008. Metodologi Penelitian. cetakan ke 9. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

17) [Nurhadi, Zikri Fachrul. 2015. Teori-Teori komunikasi: Teori Komunikasi Dalam Perspektif Penelitian Kualitatif. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

18) Prasadja, H & Agustian, M. 2000. Anak Jalanan dan Kekerasan. Jakarta: PKPM Unika Atmajaya

19) Rakhmat, Jalaludding. 2003. Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung:PT. REMAJA ROSDAKARYA.

20) Riswandi. 2013. Psikologi Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

21) Ritzer, George dan Douglas J. Goodman. 2004. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Kencana.

22) Sobur, Alex. 2003. Semiotika Komunikasi, cetakan ke-5. Bandung: PT. REMAJA ROSDAKARYA.

23) Soeprapto, Riyadi.2002. Interaksionisme Simbolik. Malang: Averroes Press.

24) Sunarto, Kamanto. 2004. Pengantar Sosiologi, edisi ke-3. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2022