VOlUME 05 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2022
1Manatche Laspi Christanto Situmorang,2Suteki
1,2Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Jl. Imam Bardjo No. 1, Pleburan, South Semarang, Central Java, 50241
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i11-45Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Study this leave from discourse the ultra petita decision has not yet found a point meeting between various parties. Related to the problem that, it is necessary to see whether it is the Constitutional Court Law prohibits ultra petita, including whether the ultra petita doctrine is generally applicable to all judges in various judicial settings. This legal research uses a normative juridical approach with research specifications analytical description. The type of data used is secondary data, consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Technique data collection using library research (library research) and from the data which collected and then analyzed by qualitative-normative. Based on results study which conducted get it conclusion, that doctrine ban ultra petita for judge no apply absolute and general. With use approach normative and interpretation systemic could said that provision in Constitution MK nor Regulation MK no give possibility for judge constitution for make decision ultra petita. In issue decisions containing ultra petita, generally the Constitutional Court is based on there is an inseparable relationship between the article being tested and other articles which is not tested, so that the article or the entire law must be stated no powerful law, inside because reason for avoid lawlessness and upholding substantive justice. MK's breakthrough in making in principle, ultra petita decisions are a form of progressive law enforcement, However, any creativity carried out by law enforcement can be ineffective means progressive when not to realize substantive justice, placing justice, benefits and human happiness as a goal finally.
KEYWORDS:birthday Petita, Testing Constitution, Law Progressive.
REFERENCES
1)ConstitutionNet, ‘Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador’, ConstitutionNet, 2010
2) Cortes, Pablo Online Dispute Resolution for Consumer in the European Union (New York: Routledge, 2011)
3) David Marrani, ‘Human Rights and Environmental Protection: The Pressure of the Charter for the Environment on the French Administrative Courts’, Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 88.4 (2009), 52–57
4) Denzin, Norman K., and LincolnY. Vonna S., Introduction: Entering The Field of Qualitative Research, (California: Sage Publication, 1994)
5) Dwi Edi Wibowo, ‘How Consumers in Indonesia Are Protected Fairly?Analysis of Law No. 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection’, Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 2.1 (2020), 57–70
6) Effendi, Tolib, Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perbandingan Komponen Dan Proses Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Medpress Digital, 2018)
7) Elizabeth Pollman, ‘The Supreme Court and the Pro-Business Paradox’, Harvard Law Review, 135.220 (2021), 220–66
8) Farbol, Rosanna, ‘Urban Civil Defence Imagining, Constructing and Performing Nuclear War in Aarhus’, Urban History, 48.4 (2021), 701–23
9) Hasuri, Hasuri, ‘Sistem Peradilan Pidana Berkeadilan Melalui Pendekatan Kontrol Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum’, Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3.2 (2019), 167
10) Hovdenak, Ingrid Marie, Tonje Holte Stea, Jos Twisk, Saskia Jacqueline Te Velde, Knut Inge Klepp, and Elling Bere, ‘Tracking of Fruit, Vegetables and Unhealthy Snacks Consumption from Childhood to Adulthood (15 Year Period): Does Exposure to a Free School Fruit Programme Modify the Observed Tracking?’, The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16.1 (2019), 22
11) Junaidi, Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, Ira Alia Maerani, ‘Responsibilities Of The Corporate Director Against The Dark Criminal Action In The Position Based On The Decision Of The Court Sumber Of Cirebon Regency (Studies on Decision No.202 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Sbr)’, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 3.1 (2020), 41–48
12) Kevin T. McGuire, ‘Birth Order, Preferences, and Norms on the U.S. Supreme Court’, Law & Society Review, 49.4 (2015), 945–72
13) Layla Maysaroh, ‘Upaya Keberatan Notaris Terhadap Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Wilayah Atas Disetujuinya Permintaan Penyidik, Penuntut Umum Dan Hakim Dalam Proses Peradilan’ (Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2018)
14) Lochlan F. Shelfer, ‘Special Juries in the Supreme Court’, The Yale Law Journal, 123.1 (2014), 1–265
15) Marbun, S. F., Peradilan Administrasi Negara Dan Upaya Administratif Di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1997)
16) Marcano-Olivier, Mariel, Ruth Pearson, Allycea Ruparell, Pauline J. Horne, Simon Viktor, and Mihela Erjavec, ‘A Low-Cost Behavioural Nudge and Choice Architecture Intervention Targeting School Lunches Increases Children’s Consumption of Fruit: A Cluster Randomised Trial’, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16.1 (2019), 1–9
17) Mohammad Sahlan, ‘Kewenangan Peradilan Tipikor Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan’, Jurnal Arena Hukum, 9.2 (2016), 166–89
18) Ryan C. Black,Ryan J. Owens,Justin Wedeking, Patrick C. Wohlfarth, ‘The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity’, Law & Society Review, 50.3 (2016), 703–32
19) Santoso, Urip, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum’, Perspektif, 21.3 (2016), 188
20) Saraswati, Retno, ‘Arah Politik Hukum Pengaturan Desa Ke Depan (Ius Constituendum)’, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 43.3 (2014), 313–21
21) Satria, Hariman, ‘Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana’, Jurnal Media Hukum, 3.2 (2018), 34–45
22) Satyayudhadananjaya, Nyoman, ‘Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu (Integreted Criminal Justice System ) Di Kaji Dari Perspektif Sub Sistem Kepolisian’, Vyavahara Duta: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Agama Dan Ilmu Hukum, IX.1 (2014), 87–94
23) Seno Wibowo Gumbira, Adi Sulistiyono, Soehartono Soehartono, ‘Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Outside the Court According to Law Number 14 of 2001 on Patent’, Hang Tuah Law Journal, 4.2 (2020), 101–17
24) Strauss, A, J Corbin, and Busir, Qualitative Research; Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques, (London, United Kingdom: Sage Publication, 1990)
25) Sulaiman, Nurul Shaeera, Kobun Rovina, and Vonnie Merillyn Joseph, ‘Classification, Extraction and Current Analytical Approaches for Detection of Pesticides in Various Food Products’, Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 1.1 (2019), 1–13
26) Valensia, Tulus Sartono, ‘Product Standardization through SNI as A Form of Consumer Protection in Indonesia’, Legality Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 28.1 (2020), 1–10
27) Waskito, Achmad Budi, ‘Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi’, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1.1 (2018), 287–304