VOlUME 05 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2022
1Angga Prasetiya,2Warto,3Sudiyanto
1,2,3History Education Postgraduate Program, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Surakarta,57125, Indonesia.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i12-75Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The construction of an understanding of Gayo is greatly influenced by how the discourse on Gayo is produced. Discourse about Gayo can only be traced through historical texts that document various narrations about Gayo. This study aims to describe how the historical discourse contained in the text is used as legitimacy in building constructions about Gayo. To analyze the various narratives about Gayo in the text, this research uses qualitative research methods with the DHA (Discourse Historical Approach). Through DHA, the construction of an understanding of Gayo in the present which was built based on historical discourse found the context. The results of this study indicate that: (1) the texts about Gayo which are grouped into three sets “Linge Kingdom Texts 1”, “Linge Kingdom Texts 2”, and “Loyang Mendale and Loyang Ujung Karang Texts” are narratively contradictory to each other; (2) the three sets of texts become a discourse that legitimizes its narrative based on historical events; (3) The “Text of the Kingdom of Linge 1” becomes the understanding of the dominant group in reproducing the understanding of the dichotomy between the Acehnese as the dominant group and the Gayo tribe as a minority through discursive practices.
KEYWORDS:Kingdom of Linge, Loyang Mendale and Loyang Ujung Karang, Discourse, Gayo.
REFERENCES
1) A.H.Hill. (1960). Hikayat Raja-Raja Pasai. The Malaysian Branch of The Royal Asiatic Society, 33(2), 1–215.
2) Bakri. (2017, November 1). Sayembara Himne Aceh Diprotes. Serambi News.
https://aceh.tribunnews.com/2017/11/01/sayembara-himne-aceh-diprotes
3) Balai Arkeologi Sumatera Utara. (2018). Berita Penelitian Arkeologi No. 34: Austronesia di Indonesia Bagian Barat:Kajian Budaya Austronesia Prasejarah dan Sesudahnya di Wilayah Budaya Gayo (Issue 34). Medan: Balai Arkeologi Sumatera Utara.
4) Bellwood, P. (2000). Prasejarah Kepulauan Indo-Malaysia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
5) Boedhisampurno, S., & Filippis, S. J. De. (1991). Pertanggalan Radiokarbon Dari 4 Situs Arkeologi. Makalah dalam Seminar Analisa Hasil Penelitian Arkeologi, Kuningan, 10-16 September.
6) Bowen, J. R. (1984a). Death and The History of Islam in Highland Aceh. Indonesia, 38(38), 21–38.
7) Bowen, J. R. (1984b). The History and Structure of Gayo Society: Variation and Change in the Highlands of Aceh. Michigan: UMI Dissertation Services.
8) Dandy, A. (1979). Sejarah Daerah dan Suku Gayo. Jakarta: Dependikbud.
9) Dijk, T. A. van. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE Publication.
10) Djajadiningrat, R. H. (1982). Kesultanan Aceh: Suatu Pembahasan tentang Sejarah Kesultanan Aceh Berdasarkan Bahan-Bahan yang Terdapat dalam Karya Melayu. Daerah Istimewa Aceh: Depdikbud.
11) Djamil, M. D. (1968). Tawarikh Raja-Raja Kerajaan Aceh. Banda Aceh: Penerbit Ajdam I Iskandar Muda.
12) Djamil, M. J. (1959). Gadjah Putih Iskandar Muda. Kutaradja: Lembaga Kebudayaan Atjeh.
13) Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge: New York.
14) Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power. New York: Routledge.
15) Grinth, H. (1996). Texte im Politischen Diskurs. Ein Vorshlag zur diskursor-ientierten Besschereibug von Textsorten. Muttersprache, 106(1), 66–80.
16) Hasjmy, A. (Ed.). (1981). Sejarah Masuk dan Berkembangnya Islam di Indonesia: Kumpulan Prasaran Pada Seminar di Aceh. Jakarta: Percetakan Offset.
17) Hasjmy, A. (1983). Kebudayaan Aceh dalam Sejarah. Penerbit Benua.
18) Kristeva, J. (1980). Word, Dialog and Novel. In L. S. Rodiez (Ed.), Desire In Language. New York: Columbia University.
19) Kristeva, J., Roudiez, L. S., Gora, T., & Jardine, A. (1982). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. In Poetics Today (Vol. 3, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.2307/1772011
20) Madjid, M. D., & Wahyudi, J. (2020). The Kingdom of Linge and Contents Early Islamization in Central Aceh. Tawarikh: Journal of Historical Studies, 12(1), 1–20.
21) Majid, D. (1981). Masuk dan Berkembangnya Islam di Aceh Tengah Serta Kaitannya Dengan Perlak dan Pasai. In A. Hasjmy (Ed.), seminar sejarah masuk dan berkembangnya Islam di Indonesia: Kumpulan Prasaran Pada Seminar di Aceh. Jakarta: Percetakan Offset.
22) Marcopolo. (1953). The Travels of Marco Polo (M. Komroff (Ed.)). New York: W.W. Norton Company, Inc. https://doi.org/10.3406/globe.1900.2177
23) Masri, D. (2015). Temuan Arkeologis Gayo Amunisi Hebat Perjuangan ALA. Lintas Gayo.
https://lintasgayo.co/2015/05/03/temuan-arkeologis-gayo-amunisi-hebat-perjuangan-ala/
24) Massa Tolak Qanun WN. (2012, November 9). Serambi Indonesia.
25) Nur, W. W. (2015). Loyang Mendale dan Penghuni Awal Ujung Utara Sumatera. Lintas Gayo.
https://lintasgayo.co/2015/07/24/loyang-mendale-dan-gayo-penghuni-awal-ujung-utara-sumatera/
26) Nur, W. W. (2021). Hasil Penelitian Loyang Mendale Untuk Apa? Lintas Gayo. https://lintasgayo.co/2021/05/27/hasil-penelitian-loyang-mendale-untuk-apa/
27) Pemerintah Aceh. (2012). Qanun Aceh Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Lembaga Wali Nanggroe.
28) Pemerintah Aceh. (2017). Sayembara Himne Aceh Perebutkan Total Hadiah 220 Juta.
https://acehprov.go.id/berita/kategori/umum/sayembara-himne-aceh-perebutkan-total-hadiah-220-juta
29) Pemerintah Aceh. (2018). Qanun Aceh Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Tentang Himne Aceh.
30) Purnawibowo, S. (2015). Identifikasi Nilai Penting Arkeologis Ceruk Hunian Prasejarah Di Takengon. In Aceh Dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Arkeologi. Denpasar: Cakra Press.
31) Said, H. M. (1981). Aceh Sepanjang Abad Jilid 1. Medan: PT Percetakan dan Penerbitan Waspada.
32) Serambi News. (2012). KP3 ALA Desak Percepatan Pembentukan Provinsi. Serambi News.
33) Serambi News. (2013). Masyarakat Gayo Menolak. Serambi News.
34) Setiawan, T. (2009). Loyang Mendale Situs Hunian Prasejarah di Pedalaman Aceh. Berkala Sangkhakala Arkeologi, 14(2), 229–239.
35) Setiawan, T. (2011). Sistem penguburan terlipat takengon. Berkala Arkeologi Sangkhakala, 14(27), 79–94.
36) Simanjuntak, T. (2017). The Western Route Migration: A Second Probable Neolithic Diffusion to Indonesia. In P. J. Piper, H. Matsumura, & D. Bulbeck (Eds.), New Perspective in Southeast Asian and Pacific Prehistory. Australia: ANU Press.
37) Suganda, D., Saraswati, R., & Sa’adah, N. (2014). Politics of Law in Qanun Reformation in Aceh: The Establishment of Wali Nanggroe Institution. Mazahib, 20(2), 251–284.
38) Wiradnyana, K. (2011). Prasejarah Sumatera Bagian Utara: Kontribusinya Pada Kebudayaan Kini. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
39) Wiradnyana, K. (2015). Perkembangan Religi Prasejarah: Tradisi Masyarakat Gayo. Amerta, 33(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.24832/amt.v33i1.209
40) Wiradnyana, K. (2017). Budaya Austronesia Di Indonesia Bagian Barat Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Migrasi Out Of Taiwan. Berkala Arkeologi SANGKHAKALA, 18(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.24832/sba.v18i1.6
41) Wiradnyana, K., & Setiawan, T. (2011). Gayo Merangkai Identitas. Jakarta: Pustaka Obor.
42) Wodak, R. (2001). The Discourse-Historical Approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publication.
43) Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
44) Wodak, R. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse-Historical Approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, April, 63–94. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d6
45) Zainuddin, H. M. (1961). Tarich Atjeh Dan Nusantara. Medan: Pustaka Iskandar Muda.