FEBRUARY 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2022
Impact of online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic on learning activities
1Ratnaningsih, 2Cholis Hidayati
1,2Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-18

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research describes whether the social presence can be obtained from online learning of distance education setting. Data in this study employed questionnaire adapted from Rovai (2002) which identified 3 aspects of social presence, namely connectedness aspect, learning aspect, and socio-emotional aspect. Data was taken from 70 students who participated in an 8-weeks online learning. The results showed that all aspects have positive attitudes from students’ point of views. The students experienced connectedness aspect, learning aspect, and socio-emotional aspect in online learning regardless the learning situation which was mostly text-based setting.

KEYWORDS:

COI Framework, community of inquiry, online learning,

REFERENCES

1) Akcaoglu, M & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning Through Small Group Discussions. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. (17), (3).

2) Aydin, I. E & Gumus, S. (2016). Sense of Clasroom Community and Team Development Process In Online Learning. Turkish Online Journal of DistanceEducation (TOJDE), (17), (1), (5), 60-77.

3) Denoyelles, A., Zydney, J.M., Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for Creating A Community of Inquiry Through Online Asynchronous Discussions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 10, 1, 153-165.

4) Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3): 87-105.

5) Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The First Decade of The Community of Inquiry Framework: A Retrospective. Internet and Higher Education , 13, 5-9.

6) Gibbs, G. (1995). Assessing Student Centred Courses. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Learning and Development.

7) Gunawardena, C.N. & Zittle, F. (1997). Social Presence as A Predictor of Satisfaction Within A Computer Mediated Conferencing Environment. AmericanJournal of Distance Education, 11, 3, 8-25.

8) Hussein, R. Aditiawarman, U., & Mohamed, N. (2007). E-learning Acceptance In A Developing Country: A Case of The Indonesian Open University. Dipresentasikan dalam konferensi German e-Science, Baden, Germany, May2–4, 2007.

9) Kosasih, L., Iqbal, M. 2013. E-learning Dengan Menggunakan COI Framework. ComTEch (4), (2), 856-866.

10) Kreijns, K., Acker, F.V., Vermeulen, M., Buuren, H.V. (2014). Community of Inquiry: Social Presence Revisited. E-learning and Digital Media, (11), (1), 5-18.

11) Rovai, A.P. (2002). Development of An Instrument To Measure Classroom Community. The Internet and Higher Education, (5), 197-211.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar