¹Muh. As Sidiq, ²Fifiana Wisnaeni

^1,2Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-24

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The problem raised in this paper is how to reconstruct the Presidential Threshold Provisions for the Election of the President and Vice President in Indonesia, based on the principles of democratic elections. In this paper, the author guided Constructivism as a paradigm and used Legal Constructivism as an approach, which will lead to conceptual ideas. The results of this study that the ideal setting regarding the provisions of the Presidential Threshold for the nomination of President and Vice President in Indonesia would be more appropriate if it can be 0%. This is an effort to present many qualified candidates for President and Vice President so that the public can see a more diverse range of pairs and will also encourage the application of the principles of democratic elections.

KEYWORDS

Democracy; Presidential Threshold; Election of President and Vice President

REFERENCES

1) A.Mukti, Fadjar, Tipe Negara Hukum (malang: bayumedia, 2004)

2) Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, ‘Akibat Hukum Regulasi Tentang Thersold Dalam Pemiliham Umum Legislatif Dan Pemilihan Presiden’, Yudisial, 12 (2019)

3) Alok K. Bohara, Neil J. Mitchell, and Carl F. Mittendorff, ‘Compound Democracy and the Control of Corruption: A Cross-Country Investigation’, The Policy Studies Journal, 32.4 (2004), 481–99

4) Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi (Jakarta: Buana Ilmu Populer, 2007)

5) Dahl, Robert, Perihal Demokrasi, Menelajahi Teori Dan Praktik Demokrasi Secara Singkat (Jakarta: Penerbit yayasan Obor, 2011)

6) Ghoffar, Abdul, ‘Problematika Presidential Theresold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengalaman Di Negara Lain’, Konstitusi, 15 (2018)

7) Huda, Ni’Matul, Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2011)

8) Indarti, Erlyn, ‘Diskresi Dan Paradigma: Sebuah Telaah Filsafat Hukum’, 2010

9) Jamaluddin Ghafur, Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana, Presidential Threshold” Sejarah, Konsep Dan Ambang Batas Persyaratan Pencalonan Dalam Tata Hukum Di Indonesia (Malang: Setara Press, 2019)

10) Jamaludin, Tetep, ‘Kesuksesan Dan Problematika Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Secara Langsung Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Etika & Pemilu, 4.1 (2018), 75–89

11) Jimly Asshiddiqie, ‘Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia’, Jurnal Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2.3 (2017), 1–17

12) MD, Moh Mahfud, Politik Hukum Di Indonesia, Cetakan ke (Jakarta: Pers, Rajawali, 2014)

13) Nasef, Imam, and Ni’Matul Huda, Penataan Demokrasi Dan Pemilu Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi (Jakarta: Kencana, 2017)

14) Surbakti, Ramlan, Integritas Pemilu 2014: Kajian Pelanggaran, Kekerasan, Dan Penyalahgunaan Uang Pada Pemilu 2014 (Jakarta: Kemitraan Partnership, 2014)

15) Suteki, and Galang Taufani, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori Dan Praktik) (Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2018)

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2022