VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022
Hayder S. Alkhafaji
Department of English Language and Literature, Islamic University of Najaf
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Through political speeches, the use of language plays an important role in shaping the political goals and activities of politicians. Political speeches have gained a lot of attention in recent years as a result of media coverage, and they have sparked a lot of curiosity. Manipulative language usage allows the speaker to exert influence over others without their will, with the control focusing on the recipients' verbal contributions to the conversation and cognitive processes of reception and interpretation. The current research looked at power dynamics in President Bush's speeches, concentrating on semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic manipulation levels, as well as the impact on the receivers' mental models. In this study, the researcher used Hallidayan Systemic Functional Linguistics to take a close look at George W. Bush's political discourses on the 2003 Iraq War. To accomplish this goal, Ten G.W. Bush interviews and speeches were gathered from various sources. Using Halliday's systemic functional linguistics as the analytical framework, discursive techniques, power relations, hidden meanings beneath the vocabulary, and the structures employed in the speeches were extracted and developed on. The study concentrated on the linguistic choices made only within three functions or meanings of the Hallidayan model. As a result, passive and active voices, nominalizations and emotive language within the ideational meaning, modality within the interpersonal meaning, and thematization (or theme development) throughout textual meaning were chosen to be analyzed in President Bush's comments about the Invasion of Iraq. Following the investigation, the researcher concluded that George W. Bush had manipulated the above-mentioned language traits. He had used these language methods in his favour and against the Iraqi people and Saddam Hussein, the country's president at that time. Furthermore, language research indicated that the previous US president made every effort to convey his country's superiority and hegemony.
KEYWORDS:Critical discourse analysis, Discourse analysis, Ideology, Linguistic manipulation, Political speech, SFL.
REFERENCES
1) Badran, D. (2002). Ideology through modality in discourse analysis. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
2) Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from: http://rs160.rapidshare.com/files/105670461/Discourse_Critical_Introduction.pdf
3) Blum-Kulka,S , Blondheim, M & Hacohen , G . (2005).Traditions of dispute: from negotiations of Talmudic texts to the arena of political discourse in the media. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1569–1594 .Department of Communication, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
4) Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
5) Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (2003). Cross-cultural representation of ‘otherness’ in media discourse .Weiss, G & Wodak, R (Eds), Critical discourse analysis .London: Palgrave Macmillan
6) Chilton, P. (2 Analysing political discourse. London: Routledge.
7) Collet, T. & Najem, T. (2005). Word choices in post-9/11 speeches and the identity construction of the other. Retrieved July 26, 2013, from: http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2005/najem.pdf
8) Copson, R.W. (2003). Iraq War: Background and Issues Overview, Congressional Research Service the Library of Congress. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from: http://www.crs.gov/products/browse/iraqdocs.shtml.
9) Cordesman, A. H. & Burke, A. A. (2007). Iraq’s Nuclear and Missile Programs: A Status Report. Retrieved July 24, 2013, from: http://www.dni.gov/press
10) Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London & New York: Longman.
11) Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. London: Longman.
12) Fetzer , A & Weizman ,F.(2005). Political discourse as mediated and public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2006) 143–153 . Retrieved , from: http:// www.elsevier.com/locate/pragma
13) Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the British press. London: Routledge.
14) Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15) Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge
16) Gelabert, J. J. (2004). Pronominal and spatio- temporal dixies in contemporary Spanish political discourse: A corpus-based pragmatic analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, College of the Liberal Arts, The
17) Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved November 6, 2013, from: http://etda.libraries.psu.edu/theses/approved /Worldwide Files/ETD-640/Gelbert_Jaime_Dissertation.pdf
18) Ghoshroy, S. (2008). Chomsky: "The Majority of the World Supports Iraq". AlterNet. Retrieved October 10, 2013 from: http://www.alternet.org/audits/101290/ Chomsky: _%22the_majority_of_the_world_supports_Iraq%22/? Page=entire
19) Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20) Goldman, S.R and Perfetti, C.A (1974) Discourse functions of thematization and topicalization. Journal of psycholinguistic research, Vol 4.No3, 1975
21) Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
22) Henderson, H. (2004). Power of the news media. New York: Facts on File, Inc. http://www.factsonfile.com
23) Kramarae, C. Schulz, M. & O’Barr, W. M. (Eds.). (1984). Language and Power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24) Karlberg. M. (2005). The power of discourse and the discourse of power: pursuing peace through discourse intervention .International Journal of Peace Studies, Volume 10, Number 1, Spring/Summer 2005
25) Kress, G. (1983). Ideological structures in discourse. In T.A Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 27-42). London: Academic press.
26) Krogh.J. (2006). The necessity of invasion - a critical analysis of George w. Bush's rhetoric on the war in iraq. Department of language and business communication.
27) Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Retrieved. January 17, 2014, from: http://philosophy.uoregon.edu/metaphor /lakoff-l.htm
28) Landay, J. (2007, November 3). Experts cast doubt on reality of Iraq nuclear threat. McClatchy-Tribune News Service. Retrieved November 1, 2013, from: http://www.mctdirect.com/Iraq's threat/doc/904713.html
29) Lazar, M. (Ed.). (2005). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse.
Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
30) Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual politics. Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.
31) Locke, T. (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. London: Longman.
32) Marchi.A. (2012). A Critical discourse analysis Of Barack Obama’s Campaign Speech in Berlin. Ma Thesis Submitted To Universidade Federal De Santa Catarina 2012
33) Martínez, D & González, V. (2011). Obama and Bush: their victory and non-victory speeches. OnOmázein 25, 205-217.Spain, 2001
34) Mattern, J.M. (2005). Ordering of International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force, New York: Routledge,
35) Matthiessen, C. & Halliday, M. A. K. (1997). Systematic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Retrieved December 25, 2013, from: http://minerva.ling
36) Mazid, B.M. (2007). Presuppositions and strategic functions in Bush’s 20/9/2001 speech: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(3), 351-375. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/doc
37) Nordlund, M. (2003). Linguistic manipulation: An analysis of how attitudes are displayed in news reporting. Retrieved November 1, 2013, from: http//epubl.ltu.se/1402-1552/2003/27/LTU-DUPP-0327-SE.pdf
38) Rashidi. N and Souzandehfar. M. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of the debates between republicans and democrats over the Continuation of war in Iraq. Shiraz University, Iran.
39) Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society 22(6) 781–807. Washington and Lee University, USA
40) Richards,J.C and Schmidt,R.(2002).Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Pearson Education Limited.
41) Rudyk, I. (2007). Power relations in president bush’s state of the Union speech. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture. Retrievedfrom:www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/Journal/
42) Schäffner, C. (1996). Editorial: Political speeches and discourse analysis. Current Issues in Language and Society, 3(3), 201-204.
43) Shayegh, K. (2012). Modality in Political Discourses of Barak Obama and Martin Luthe King. Journal homepage: http://www.sciroad.com/ntase.html
44) Sykes, M. (1985). Discrimination in discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 83-101). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
45) Thomas, L. &et al. (1999). Language, society and power. London: Routledge.
46) Teittinen, M. 2000. “Power and persuasion in the Finnish presidential rhetoric in the early 1990’s” .Retrieved January 21, 2014from: http://www/natcom.org/conferences/finland/mariteittinen.
47) Toolan, M. J. (Ed.). (2002). Critical discourse analysis. Critical concepts in linguistics. New York: Routledge.
48) Van Dijk.T. A. (2008). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics towards critical epistemic discourse analysis. Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona
49) Van Dijk.T. A. (2009). “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. 62-86. Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Discourse analysis in society: London: Academic Press.
50) Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51) Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Power and the news media
52) Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse Studies. A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage. Volume 2: Discourse as Social Interaction.
53) Van Dijk, T.A. (1993), Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society.4 (2), 249-283. Retrieved January 8, 2014, from: http://www.discourse-in- society.org/know-news.html
54) Van Dijk, T.A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17, 359-383.Retrieved January 8, 2014, from: http://das.sagepub.com /cgi/content abstract/1/1/39 Van Dijk, T.A (1993). Political Discourse and political cognitions.
55) Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introduction to social semiotics. London: Routledge.
56) Victoria, E. (2002). Propaganda: Critical analysis of President George W. Bush's state of the union address. Retrieved September 25, 2013, from: http://www. freedomwriter.com/issue27/am1.htm
57) Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2003). Critical discourse analysis. Theory and interdisciplinarity.
Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
58) Wodak, R. (1989). Language, power and ideology. Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
59) Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203-225. Retrieved February 13, 2014, from: http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/wodak/papers/06hbprag.pdf
60) Wodak, R. (Ed.). (1997). Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.
61) Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
62) Young, L., & Harrison, C. (Eds.). (2004). Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Studies in social change. London: Continuum.
63) The speeches text taken from: Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/mar/18/usa.iraq 15
64) Nytimes http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/22/washington/w23policytext.html
65) Nytimes http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/24/politics/25PTEX-FULL.html