APRIL 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022
University Instructors’ Perceptions about the Prominence of Culturally Responsive Teaching Pedagogy
Mohamed Achamrah
Moulay Ismail University, Flhs, Meknes, Morocco

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i4-31

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This qualitative study occurs in linguistically and culturally varied Moroccan higher educational contexts. It includes interviewing (10) University instructors from different universities in Morocco. The aim is to get their views and perceptions about the importance of implementing culturally responsive teaching pedagogy in their teaching methods and approaches to enhance learning opportunities for students from linguistically and culturally diverse backgrounds. The notable objective of this study is to inaugurate an appropriate teaching pedagogy to teach students from varied backgrounds and to effectively satisfy the learning and teaching processes of these culturally and linguistically diverse students. The data collected from all the participants were studied and organized according to similarities and differences. The analysis of all instructors’ answers revealed their agreement that culturally responsive teaching methods and approaches are paramount to engaging culturally and linguistically diverse students in the classroom for more academic achievements.

KEYWORDS:

University Instructors; Culturally Responsive Pedagogy; University Context; Moroccan Higher Education; Diverse Students

REFERENCES

1) Aceves, T. C., & Orosco, M. J. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching (Document No. IC-2). Retrieved from http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation- configurations/

2) Ballenger, J. W., & Ninness, S. (2013). Increasing one’s cultural proficiency. National Forum of Multicultural Issues Journal, 10(1), 1–5.

3) Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19, 1–18.

4) Briggs, J. (2014). Engaging critical race theory and culturally relevant teaching: Preparing White teacher candidates to teach in urban environments.

5) Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

6) Doran, P. R. (2014). Professional development for teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse learners: Teachers’ experiences and perceptions. Global Education Journal, 14(3), 62–80.

7) Durden, T. R., Escalante, E., & Blitch, K. (2014). Start with us! Culturally relevant pedagogy in the classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43, 223–232.

8) Fraise, N. J., & Brooks, J. S. (2015). Toward a theory of culturally relevant leadership for school-community culture. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(1), 5–21.

9) Garnett, J. M. (2012). Culturally proficient teachers influence on student achievement

10) Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Malden, MA: Wiley Periodicals.

11) Irvine, J. J. (2015). Restructuring teacher education to prepare teachers for diversity.

12) Irvine, J. J., & Hawley, W. D. (2011). The teaching evaluation gap: Current assessments of teacher effectiveness. Teaching Tolerance.

13) Kesler, T. (2011). Teachers’ texts in culturally responsive teaching (EJ931), Language Arts, 88, 419–428.

14) Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.

15) Li, G. (2011). The role of culture in literacy learning and teaching. In L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 515–538). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

16) Li, G. (2013). Promoting teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students as change agents: A cultural approach to professional learning. Theory into Practice, 52, 136–143.

17) Masuda, A. M., Ebersole, M. M., & Barrett, D. (2012). A qualitative inquiry: Teachers’ attitudes and willingness to engage in professional development at different career stages. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 79(2), 6–14.

18) Parks, J. (2012). The importance of teaching multiculturism and diversity, Hatch Early Learning. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008

19) Ryan, M., & Qayyum, W. (2012). Designing an intercultural training framework for information professionals. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 51(3), 226– 230.

20) Souto-Manning, M. (2013). Multicultural teaching in the early childhood classroom: Approaches, strategies, and tools for preschool–2nd grade. New York, NY: Teachers College Press

21) Stake, R. E. (2010). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.

22) Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research

23) Ullucci, K., & Battey, D. (2011). Exposing color blindness/grounding color consciousness: Challenges for teacher education. Urban Education, 46, 1195– 1225.

24) Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar