VOlUME 05 ISSUE 05 MAY 2022
1Muslikh, 2Siti Fatimah, 3Didin Nurul Rosidin, 4Abas Hidayat
1,4Doctoral Student, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati (IAIN) Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia
2,3Assoc. Prof., Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati (IAIN) Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia
1Lecturer, STKIP Nahdlatul Ulama Kabupaten Tegal, Central Java, Indonesia
4Lecturer, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia.
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Maieutic is a Socrates midwifery method that helps deliver babies from their mother’s wombs. This education method provides a position to students as subjects who explore their potential by interacting with the outside environment to gain knowledge. Constructivism is a learning theory about knowledge that outcomes from human construction. These methods and theories are essential in education to produce quality human resources. In line with the government’s freedom of learning policy, this study aims to determine the constructivism theory and Maeiutica method applied in the learning process. Students realize their potential and are oriented to determine their future. The method used in this qualitative research is the library research method through the study of references related to the theme of the problem to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the research with the quality output of human resources. Based on the analysis of this research that the constructivism theory and the Maieutica Method can shape students as learning subjects and determine the creation of quality human resources.
KEYWORDS:Maieutic; Constructivism; Student; Learning; Subjects and Human Resources
REFERENCES
1) Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.
2) Bakhtiar, A. (2012). Filsafat Ilmu. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
3) Banasuru, A. (2013). Filsafat dan filsafat ilmu. Alfabeta.
4) Beerenwinkel, A., & von Arx, M. (2017). Constructivism in practice: An exploratory study of teaching patterns and student motivation in physics classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 237–255.
5) Candy, P. C. (1989). Constructivism and the study of self-direction in adult learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 21(2), 95–116.
6) Cetina, K. K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 140–167.
7) Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning (pp. 1–23). Springer.
8) D Drljača, M. (2020). Constructivist learning theory and logopedagogy in arts education. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj i Obrazovanje, 22(Sp. Ed. 1), 181–202.
9) Darman, R. A. (2020). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Guepedia.
10) Darmi, T., & Suwitri, S. (2017). Strengthening the capacity of human resources apparatus in the implementation of new autonomous regions. European Journal of Social Sciences, 55(4), 427–438.
11) Dewey, J. (2011). The sources of a science of education. Read Books Ltd.
12) Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
13) Emda, A. (2018). Kedudukan motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran. Lantanida Journal, 5(2), 172–182.
14) Etuk, A. R. (2022). An exposition of the cognitive problems in Rescher‟ s Coherentist truth criteriology. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 19(1), 155–173.
15) Fadli, M. R. (2021). Hubungan filsafat dengan ilmu pengetahuan dan relevansinya di era revolusi industri 4.0 (Society 5.0). Jurnal Filsafat, 31(1), 130–161.
16) Faizah, U. (2020). Etika lingkungan dan aplikasinya dalam pendidikan menurut perspektif aksiologi. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 3(1), 14–22.
17) Faliyandra, F. (2019). Tri Pusat Kecerdasan Sosial" Membangun Hubungan Baik Antar Manusia Pada Lingkungan Pendidikan di Era Teknologi". Literasi Nusantara.
18) Fujiah, F., Prayogi, S., & Hidayat, S. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction (PBI) Berbasis Autentik Asesment untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 4(2), 55–58.
19) Ginting, M. B. (2018). Membangun Pengetahuan Anak Usia Dini Melalui Permainan Konstruktif Berdasarkan Perspektif Teori Piaget. Jurnal Caksana: Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 1(02).
20) Godler, Y. (2020). Post-post-truth: An adaptationist theory of journalistic verism. Communication Theory, 30(2), 169–187.
21) Goltz, S. M., Hietapelto, A. B., Reinsch, R. W., & Tyrell, S. K. (2008). Teaching teamwork and problem solving concurrently. Journal of Management Education, 32(5), 541–562.
22) Gordon, M. (2009). Toward a pragmatic discourse of constructivism: Reflections on lessons from practice. Educational Studies, 45(1), 39–58.
23) Hakim, L. (2016). Pemerataan akses pendidikan bagi rakyat sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(1).
24) Hamdayama, J. (2022). Metodologi pengajaran. Bumi Aksara.
25) Hidayat, A., Fatimah, S., & Rosidin, D. N. (2022). Challenges and Prospects of Islamic Education Institutions and Sustainability in The Digital Era. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 351–366.
26) Hidayat, A., & Perdana, F. J. (2019). Pengaruh Self-Efficacy dan Self-Esteem Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Cirebon. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 4(12), 1–16.
27) Hidayat, A., & Perdana, F. J. (2021). Media Hippo Animator pada Pembelajaran Statistika dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Statistik dan Self-confidence Mahasiswa di Era Pandemi Covid 19. JUMLAHKU: Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah STKIP Muhammadiyah Kuningan, 7(2), 100–126.
28) Huang, H. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27–37.
29) Huang, R., Liu, D., Tlili, A., Knyazeva, S., Chang, T. W., Zhang, X., Burgos, D., Jemni, M., Zhang, M., & Zhuang, R. (2020). Guidance on open educational practices during school closures: Utilizing OER under COVID-19 pandemic in line with UNESCO OER recommendation. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University.
30) Jufri, W. (2013). Belajar dan pembelajaran sains. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.
31) Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2011). A model for e‐education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 6–18.
32) Juwantara, R. A. (2019). Analisis teori perkembangan kognitif piaget pada tahap anak usia operasional konkret 7-12 tahun dalam pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), 27–34.
33) Kadir, A. (2013). Konsep pembelajaran kontekstual di sekolah. Dinamika Ilmu: Jurnal Pendidikan.
34) Kaufman, D. (1996). Constructivist-based experiential learning in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 40–50.
35) Kholil, M., Fatimah, S., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Multicultural Education according to Azyumardi Azra’s Perspective. International Journal Of Social Science And Human Research, 5(4), 1518–1522.
36) Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability, 11(21), 6104.
37) Koohang, A., Riley, L., Smith, T., & Schreurs, J. (2009). E-learning and constructivism: From theory to application. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5(1), 91–109.
38) Kurniawan, M. I. (2015). Mendidik untuk membentuk karakter siswa sekolah dasar: studi analisis tugas guru dalam mendidik siswa berkarakter pribadi yang baik. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 121–126.
39) Leigh, F. (2007). Platonic dialogue, maieutic method and critical thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(3), 309–323.
40) Longo, A. (2020). An Ecological Maieutics. In Danilo Dolci (pp. 13–25). Springer.
41) Marizal, M., & Sudibjo, H. (2020). Potensi Kehidupan Manusia Dalam Perspektif Psikologi Islam. Psikobuletin: Buletin Ilmiah Psikologi, 1(1), 38–50.
42) Masgumelar, N. K., & Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 49–57.
43) Maulidya, A. (2018). Berpikir dan problem solving. Ihya Al-Arabiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 4(1).
44) Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Bustamante-Bello, M.-R., Rosas-Fernández, J.-B., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278.
45) Mjaaland, M. T. (2016). Theaetetus: Giving Birth, or Kierkegaard’s Socratic Maieutics. In Volume 2, Tome I: Kierkegaard and the Greek World-Socrates and Plato (pp. 135–166). Routledge.
46) Muhsin, M. A. Al, & Ahmad, N. (2019). The emergence of education 4.0 trends in teaching Arabic Islamic finance curriculum design: A case study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(4), 1019–1029.
47) Murphy, K. L., Mahoney, S. E., Chen, C., Mendoza‐Diaz, N. V, & Yang, X. (2005). A constructivist model of mentoring, coaching, and facilitating online discussions. Distance Education, 26(3), 341–366.
48) Mursid, R. (2013). Pengembangan model pembelajaran praktik berbasis kompetensi berorientasi produksi. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 5(1).
49) Nurhayati, E. (2018). Psikologi pendidikan inovatif (Vol. 2). Pustaka Pelajar.
50) Nursikin, M. (2016). Aliran-Aliran Filsafat Pendidikan Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam. ATTARBIYAH: Journal of Islamic Culture and Education, 1(2), 303–334.
51) Perdana, F. J., Hidayat, A., & Fuad, V. (2021). TERAPI AFEKTIF MEDIA DIGITAL TERHADAP PROKRASTINASI AKADEMIK PADA TUGAS AKHIR DAN SKRIPSI MAHASISWA DI ERA PANDEMI COVID-19. Edueksos: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi, 10(2).
52) Pratiwi, S. N. (2020). Manajemen Strategi Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan Di Era 4.0. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 109–114.
53) Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in Education for Sustainable Development. Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development, 39, 39–59.
54) Rini, Y. S., & Tari, J. P. S. (2013). Pendidikan: hakekat, tujuan, dan proses. Jogyakarta: Pendidikan Dan Seni Universitas Negeri Jogyakarta.
55) Rusman. (2017). Belajar & Pembelajaran: Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Prenada Media.
56) Saputro, M. N. A., & Pakpahan, P. L. (2021). Mengukur Keefektifan Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. JOEAI: Journal of Education and Instruction, 4(1), 24–39.
57) Simarmata, J., Abi Hamid, M., Ramadhani, R., Chamidah, D., Simanihuruk, L., Safitri, M., Napitupulu, D., Iqbal, M., & Salim, N. A. (2020). Pendidikan Di Era Revolusi 4.0: Tuntutan, Kompetensi & Tantangan. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
58) Subakti, H., Harianja, J. K., Ogara, D. O., Arni, Y., Fauzi, A., & Simarmata, J. (2022). Landasan Pendidikan. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
59) Suharti, S. P., Sumardi, M. K., Hanafi, M., & Hakim, L. (2020). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakad Media Publishing.
60) Suparlan, S. (2019). Teori konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran. Islamika, 1(2), 79–88.
61) Supriadi, S. (2018). Kepribadian Manusia Perpektif Al-Quran (Pendekatan Tafsir dan Ilmu Psikologi). Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah, 19(1), 110–129.
62) Suriasumantri, J. S. (2007). Filsafat ilmu. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
63) Susilawati, W., Karyadinata, R., & Sugilar, H. (2019). Cognitive conflict strategy to the improvement of students’ lateral mathematical thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1), 12174.
64) Sutarman, S., Tjahjono, H. K., & Hamami, T. (2017). The implementation of holistic education in Muhammadiyah’s Madrasah Indonesia. Dinamika Ilmu: Jurnal Pendidikan, 191–203.
65) Turnbull, W. (2003). Language in action: Psychological models of conversation. Routledge.
66) Ulazia, A., & Ibarra-Berastegi, G. (2020). Problem-based learning in university studies on renewable energies: case of a laboratory windpump. Sustainability, 12(6), 2495.
67) Westfall, J. (2009). Ironic midwives: Socratic maieutics in Nietzsche and Kierkegaard. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 35(6), 627–648.
68) Wulandari, A. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Application of Learning Models Creative Problem Solving and Problem Based Instruction: The Impact on Students Mathematics Learning Interest. 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020), 150–155.
69) Yahdi, M. (2010). Fungsi Pendidikan Islam dalam Kehidupan Manusia. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 13(2), 211–225.
70) Yu, L., Shek, D. T. L., & Zhu, X. (2018). The influence of personal well-being on learning achievement in university students over time: Mediating or moderating effects of internal and external university engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2287.
71) Yusuf, M., & Arfiansyah, W. (2021). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar” dalam Pandangan Filsafat Konstruktivisme. AL-MURABBI: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 7(2), 120–133.
72) Zein, M. (2016). Peran guru dalam pengembangan pembelajaran. Jurnal Inspiratif Pendidikan, 5(2), 274–285.