VOlUME 05 ISSUE 05 MAY 2022
Iman Morshed Mohammad Hammad
Department of English Language and Literature, An-Najah National University
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This paper aims to analyze the characters of T.S Eliot’s Murder in the Cathedral in an endeavor to prove that Eliot’s characterization in the play is not to be tackled using conventional ways of analysis. Embracing these ways in the previous studies of the play resulted in a faulty assessment of characters as lacking psychological depth and dramatic tension. The paper argues that the method of character depiction employed in the play is meant to produce a ritualistic work celebrating Becket’s martyrdom and glorifying the ideas it stands for. Since martyrdom is the central idea that the play revolves around, glorification of the individual is not expected, for what it requires is self-abnegation or self-erasure. Hence, the study proves that Thomas Becket did the right thing for the right cause after passing all the tests of faith similar to those described in morality plays and transcending the strong temptations he underwent. It is evident that Becket fell in love with martyrdom as an act of redemption, but his sacrificial death is far from being suicidal because he did not allow the powers of temptations to lead him astray.
KEYWORDS:T.S Eliot, Drama, Religious plays, Murder in the Cathedral, Characterization.
REFERENCES
1) Brown, E. Martin. (1970).The Making of T.S. Eliot’s Plays. Cambridge University Press.Cameron, J.M. (1958). T.S. Eliot as a Political Writer” in T.S Eliot: A Symposium for his Birthday
2) Ed. Neville Braybrook, New York: Farrar Straus and Cudahy.
3) English Literature. (2021). “Interpretation: of Murder in the Cathedral.” Available on
https://www.englishliterature.info/2021/02/interpretation-murder-in-cathedral.html. Retrieved on April 16th, 2022.
4) Example Essays. (2002) “Murder in the Cathedral” Available on https://www.exampleessays.com/viewpaper/46736.html. Retrieved on April 16th, 2022.
5) Gardner, Helen. (1991). The Art of T.S Eliot. 3rd Ed. London: Faber and Faber.
6) Ivy Panda. ( 2019).“Murder in the Cathedral: The Constant Battle between the Two Antipodes.”
Available at https://ivypanda.com/essays/murder-in-the-cathedral-the-constant-battle- between-the-two-antipodes/ Retrieved on April 16th, 2022.
7) Jones, David Edwards. (1962). The Plays of T.S. Eliot. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8) Kenner, Hugh ed. (1962). T.S Eliot: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall
9) Martin, Graham. (1972). Eliot in Perspective: A Symposium. London, Macmillan.
10) Moody, A.D. (1979). Thomas Stearns Eliot. Cambridge: CUP.
11) Mambrol, Nasrullah. (2019) “Analysis of Murder in the Cathedral.” Available at:
https://literariness. Org/2018/07/19/analysis-of-murder-in-the-cathedral/. Speaight Retrieved on April 9th, 2022.
12) Mega Essays. “Living and Partly Living”. Available at https://www.megaessays.com\Viewpaper/77041.html. Retrieved on April 9th, 2022.
13) Peter, John. (1969) “A New Interpretation of the Waste Land.” Essays in Criticism 19.140-75.
14) Schneider, Elizabeth. (1922). “Prufrock and After.” PMLA 87. 1103-1119.
15) Sharma, H.L. (1976). T.S. Eliot: His Dramatic Theories. New Delhi: Chord and Company.
16) Smith, Grover. (1956). T.S Eliot’s Poetry and Plays: A Study in Sources and Meaning.
17) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press., Robert. (1938). Thomas Becket. London, Longman
18) Unger, Leonard. (1966). “T.S Eliot’s Images of Awareness.” Sewanee Review 74.197-224.