VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022
1Haji Munirah, 2Aslamiah, 3Ahmad Muhyani Rizalie
1,2,3Master of Educational Administration Program, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
This study aims to describe and analyze the kyai leadership model in Modern Islamic Boarding Schools. This research uses a multi-case qualitative approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observations, and documentation. Data analysis was performed using an interactive analysis of Hubermann's (2014) model. The study’s results found that the Kyai Leadership Model in Ummul Qura' and Pesantren Ar-Raudhah Islamic boarding schools is a transformational leadership model with a participatory leadership approach. Transformational leadership models include charismatic leaders (individualized effect), motivators and inspirers (inspiration motivation), stimulating subordinates (intellectual stimulation), and understanding the personality of subordinates (Individualized consideration). Meanwhile, the participatory model of kyai leadership is in the form of openness, listening, and accepting the opinions of subordinates.
KEYWORDS:Leadership, Islamic Boarding School
REFERENCES
1) Aslamiah., A. I. & M. S. (2019). correlation between the Principal Role, Motivation and Satisfaction with the Performance of Elementary School Teachers. Journal of K6, Education, and Management, 2(2)(87–96).
2) Asy’ari, Hasyim; Hasibuan, Abdul Azis; Rosyad, M. N. (2019). Kepemimpinan Karismatik K.H.Moh. Hasib Wahab di Pondok Pesantren Bahrul Ulum Tambakberas Jombang. Nidhomul Haq:Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 250–251.
3) Azzaini, J. (2015). A Tribute(2015). Mizan.
4) Bass, R. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5) Hasibuan, M. S. . (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara.
6) Lethwood, K. (2018). The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Conditions and Student Engagement With School. Ontario Institute For Studies In Education.
7) Martoyoo, S. (2000). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE.
8) Miles, M. B. and A. M. H. (2005). Qualitative Data Analysis. UI-Press.
9) Partiningsih, S. (2014). PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN PARTISIPATIF TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH ABDUL WAHAB SJAHRANIE KOTA SAMARINDA. EJournal Ilmu
10) Pemerintahan, 1791.
11) Rivai, V., & Sagala, E. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan dari Teori ke Praktik. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
12) Robbins. (2007). Perilaku Organisasi. Salemba Empat.
13) Saleh, D. (2019). correlation between the Principal Role, Motivation and Satisfaction with the Performance of Elementary School Teachers. Journal of K6, Education, and Management(J-K6EM), 2(2), 87–96.
14) Suharsaputra, U. (2013). Administrasi Pendidikan. Refika Aditama.
15) Supardi. (2014). Kinerja Guru. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
16) Wote, Alice Yeni Verawati, dan J. S. P. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar 3(4).
17) Remiswal, Hasbi, F., & Diani, P. Y. (2020). Model Kepemimpinan di Pondok Pesantren. PRODU : Prokurasi Edukasi Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 71.