VOlUME 05 ISSUE 07 JULY 2022
1Husni Kurniawati, 2Yunanto
1,2Master of Law,Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Settlement of disputes through arbitration is based on a written agreement that has been agreed upon by the parties. The agreement is valid and binding based on Article 1338 of the Civil Code, which contains the pacta sunt servanda principle and excludes third parties from interfering in the settlement. However, regarding the arbitration award, it may be filed for annulment to the court. With the submission to the district court, there is third-party intervention in settling disputes. This research used a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical research specifications. The sources and types of data used were secondary data collected through the literature, which was then analyzed descriptively-qualitatively. The research results showed that in the annulment of the arbitration award, the pacta sunt servanda principle was still upheld with the limitation of the court's authority only to declare the annulment and was not authorized to take action to adjudicate itself. Thus, the pacta sunt servanda principle remained valid because the arbitration institution still carried out the settlement following the agreed agreement.
KEYWORDS:Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle, Annulment, Arbitration Award
REFERENCES
1) Andreas.D. dan Ariawan. (2020). ANALISIS PENERAPAN ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PERJANJIAN YANG TERDAPAT KLAUSULA ARBITRASE APABILA ADANYA GUGATAN KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG. Jurnal hukum Adigama. Vol.3(No.2).184-203.
2) Ariprabowo.T. dan Nazriyah .R. (2017). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. Jurnal Kosntitusi. Vol.14 (No.4). 701 – 727.
3) Dewi, A.D. (2018). TARIK ULUR KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT LEMBAGA ARBITRASE (Kajian Terhadap Prinsip Niet van Openbaar Orde dan Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Klausul Arbitrase). Dialogia Iuridica Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi. Vol.9(No.2).41-59.
4) Fuady, M. (2006). Arbitrase Nasional: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Bandung: Citra Aditya.
5) Harahap, M.Y. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persudangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
6) Khoidin. (2013). Hukum Arbitrase Bidang Perdata. Yogyakarta: CV Aswaja Pressindo.
7) Nugroho,S.A. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Grup
8) Rengganis. (2011). Tinjuan Yuridis Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Berdasarkan Pasal 70 Undang-Undang No 30 Tahun 1999 (Studi Kasus Terhadap Beberapa Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI). Tesis. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
9) Salim. (2015). Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Praktik Penyusunan Kontrak. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
10) Suteki dan Taufani.G. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
11) Widjaja, G. (2001). Seri Hukum Bisnis: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
12) Winanta, F.H. (2013). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
13) Yunanto, Y. (2019). Hakikat Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Sengketa Yang Dilandasi Perjanjian. Law, Development and Justice Review. Vol 2 (No 1).33-49.