VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023
1,2Roy Andry Yani,3Mustikasari Mustikasari,1Rahmi Imelisa
1Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Indonesia
2Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Cirebon, Indonesia
3Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-69Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Bullying is still being a phenomenon in Indonesia. Victims of bullying is not just passive actors in bullying situations. In 2021 the data of Junior High School in Cirebon City, bullying cases reached to 83 cases. One of the efforts to increase self-efficacy for victims of bullying is by providing counseling services using counseling group strategies. The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of counseling group towards self-efficacy at victim bullying students. This research used analytical method, quasi experimental design with pretest and posttest group design. The sample of this research was 42 victim bullying students who have been recorded in the counseling section and meet the inclusion criteria. The data collecting of this research was using questionnaires and analyzed with independent sample t tests and paired tests. The results of this research showed that the characteristics of students who were victims of bullying were mostly women (57.1%) with an average age of 13.86 years. The average self-efficacy before the intervention was 27.9 points and after the intervention was 38.3 points. There is a correlation between gender characteristics and self-efficacy for victim bullying students, but there is no difference in age with self-efficacy for victim bullying students. There is an effect of counseling group towards self-efficacy at victim bullying students of Junior High School in Cirebon City with p value of 0.000. The school is expected to be able to take an action to prevent bullying case with health education providers and increase self-efficiency at victim bullying students using counseling group.
KEYWORDS:Counseling Group; Self-Efficacy; Bullying.
REFERENCES
1) Abdurakhman, R. N., Lawej, A. I., & Herlina, N. (2022). The Influence of Project-Based Outdoor Learning Activities on Children’s Independence Development. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i2.15
2) Ali, S., Hartini, N., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2022). Characteristics Of Bullying Perpetrators And Bullying Victimization At The Indonesians Schools; A-Review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 3392–3404.
3) Ando, M., Asakura, T., & Simons-Morton, B. (2005). Psychosocial Influences on Physical, Verbal, and Indirect Bullying Among Japanese Early Adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(3), 268–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431605276933
4) Andreou, E. (2004). Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self-efficacy in Greek primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839897
5) Atici, M. (2014). Examination of school counselors’ activities: From the perspectives of counselor efficacy and collaboration with school staff. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 14(6).
6) Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
7) Cao, Y., & Yang, F. (2018). Self-Efficacy and Problem Behaviors of School Bully Victims: Evidence from Rural China. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(10), 3241–3249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1150-0
8) Doll, B., Song, S., & Siemers, E. (2004). Classroom ecologies that support or discourage bullying. In Bullying in American schools (pp. 183–206). Routledge.
9) Endresen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In Constructive & destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, & society. (pp. 147–165). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10433-007
10) Fatimah, S., Rosidin, D. N., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Student-based Learning in The Perspective of Constructivism Theory and Maieutics Method. International Journal Of Social Science And Human Research, 5(5), 1632–1637.
11) Gonçalves, F. G., Heldt, E., Peixoto, B. N., Rodrigues, G. A., Filipetto, M., & Guimarães, L. S. P. (2016). Construct validity and reliability of Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire – Brazilian version. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0019-7
12) Hamburger, M. E., Basile, K., & Vivolo, A. (2011). Measuring Bullying and Bystander Experiences: A compendium of assessment tools. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention.
13) Hidayat, A., & Perdana, F. J. (2019). Pengaruh Self-Efficacy dan Self-Esteem Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Cirebon. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 4(12), 1–16.
14) Kasmad, K., Abdillah, A. J., & Karnelia, M. (2022). The Impact of Using Brisk Walking Exerrcise in Lower Blood Sugar of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Nursing Information, 1(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijni.v1i1.6
15) Kustinah, E., Kambali, K., & Lama’atushabakh, M. (2022). Humanistic Counseling and Student Learning Motivation. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i2.19
16) Muñoz-Silva, A., Sánchez-García, M., Nunes, C., & Martins, A. (2007). Gender differences in condom use prediction with Theory of Reasoned Action and Planned Behaviour: The role of self-efficacy and control. AIDS Care, 19(9), 1177–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120701402772
17) NASIR, A., WARIDIN, W., ISKANDAR, D. D., SUSILOWATI, I., & HIDAYAT, A. (2022). Shariah-Based Hospitality, Competitive Advantage and Tourists’ Revisiting Interest on Indonesia Tourism. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(8), 2134. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.8(64).06
18) Perdana, F. J., Hidayat, A., & Fuad, V. (2021). TERAPI AFEKTIF MEDIA DIGITAL TERHADAP PROKRASTINASI AKADEMIK PADA TUGAS AKHIR DAN SKRIPSI MAHASISWA DI ERA PANDEMI COVID-19. Edueksos: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi, 10(2).
19) Pratomo, H. W., & Kuswati, Y. (2022). The Effect of Teacher Motivation on Student Achievement in Islamic Senior High School. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(2), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i2.17
20) R Nur Abdurakhman, Abas Hidayat, Didi Taswidi, & Alifa Romadoni. (2022). Effect of hypertension exercise on blood pressure in the elderly. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 13(3), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.13.3.0269
21) Rahmawati, A., & Purwandari, E. (2015). Hubungan antara efikasi diri dengan penyesuaian diri santri baru. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
22) Rochmat, C. S., Yoranita, A. S. P., & Putri, H. A. (2022). Islamic Boarding School Educational Values in Efforts to Realize Student Life Skills at University of Darussalam Gontor. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(2), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i2.18
23) Schmidt, J. J. (1999). Counseling in schools. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &Bacon.
24) Shafie, A. A. H. Bin, Miskam, N. A. B. A., Rozubi, N. B. C., & Anuar, A. A. Bin. (2018). Enhancing the self-efficacy and assertiveness level among the bullied victim school students by using cognitive behaviour theraphy (cbt) in group counselling approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science.
25) Suteja, S., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Students’ Critical Thinking and Writing Skills in Project-Based Learning. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v1i1.5
26) Syamita, E. L. (2016). Gambaran Perilaku Bullying pada Remaja di SMP Negeri 11 dan SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta. Naskah Pubilikasi. Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Diakses Melalui Http://Repository. Umy. Ac. Id.
27) Underwood, M. K., & Rosen, L. H. (2010). GENDER AND BULLYING: Moving Beyond Mean Diff erences to Consider Conceptions of Bullying, Processes by which Bullying Unfolds, and Cyberbullying. Bullying in North American Schools, 33–42.
28) Wachs, S., Bilz, L., Fischer, S., Schubarth, W., & Wright, M. (2018). Students’ Willingness to Intervene in Bullying: Direct and Indirect Associations with Classroom Cohesion and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), 2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112577