¹ Alvin Afriansyah ,² Joko Setiyono

^1,2 Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-71

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Until now, the discourse on ultra petita decisions has not found a point meeting between various parties. In this matter it is also necessary to examine, what are the considerations for making ultra decisions the petita , so that it can be known in what ways the constitutional judges can drop decision which contain super petita. From consideration- With these considerations, we can determine whether there really is enforcement law which progressive. This legal research uses a normative juridical approach with research specification analytical description. The type of data used is secondary data, consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Technique data collection using library research ( library research) and from the data which collected and then analyzed in a manner qualitative-normative. From results study which conducted get it conclusion, that doctrine ban super petita for judge no apply absolute and general. With use approach normative and interpretation systemic could said that provision in Constitution MK nor Regulation MK no give possibility for judge constitution for make decision super petita. In issue decisions containing ultra petita, in general the Court based there is an inseparable connection between the article being reviewed and other articles which is not tested, so therefore the article or the entire law must be stated no strength law, in side because reason for avoid lawlessness and uphold substantive justice. MK's breakthrough in making ultra petita decisions in principle are a form of progressive law enforcement, However, any creativity carried out by law enforcers may not be progressive meaning if not to realize substantive justice, placing justice, benefit and human happiness as a goal finally.

KEYWORDS:

Ulta Petita, Testing Constitution, Law Progressive

REFERENCES

1) Adnan Buyung Nasution in Quo _ Vadis" Law and Justice in Indonesian , CompassEdition December 22 20 08 .

2) Alim, Muhammad, 2008, Trias Politica in the State of Medina , Secretary General of the Indonesian Constitutional Court, Jakarta. Assiddiqie, Jimmy. Idea Base About Constitution and Court Constitution , Paper,

3) in download from www.jimli.com/makalah

4) ----------, 2008. Court Constitution in System state administration RI , Ingredients lectureon Spatial Education and Sespim Police, Bandung.

5) ----------, 2005. Law Event Testing Act , Secretariat General andSecretariat MKRI, Jakarta.

6) ----------, 2005. Authority Dispute between Institution country , press conference, Jakarta.

7) ----------, 2005. Constitution and Constitutionalism Indonesian , Secretariat General and Secretariat MKRI, Jakarta.

8) Dawn, Abdul Mukti. 2006. Law Constitution and Court Constitution , Jakarta, Constitutionpress. Image Media.

9) Harjono, 2008, Constitution As Home nation , Secretary General and Secretariat MKRI, Jakarta.

10) ---------. 1961. general Theoy Of law and Staat . Russell & Russell. New York. translated by Muttaqien, Raisul. 2006. General Theory of Law and country , Print I, Nusamedia and Shades. Bandung.

11) ----------. 2007. Theory Law Pure : Basics Knowledge Law normative , Bandung, Nusamedia and Nuance.

12) KC. Wheare, Modern Constitution , London-New York-Toronto, Oxford University Press, 3rd Impressions, 1975.

13) Levi, Leonard W. 2005. judicial Reviews. Bandung. Nusamedia and Nuance.

14) Mahfud MD, Constitution and Law in Debate Issue , Eagle press, Jakarta, 2009.

15) ----------, 1999, Build Political Law Enforce Constitution , LP3ES, Jakarta.

16) -----------, 2007, Debate Law System Country Post amendment , LP3ES, Jakarta.

17) -----------, 2008. Sign Barrier and Expansion Authority Court constitution i,submitted in front of Commission III DPR-RI during the fit and proper test for Becomes constitutional judge March 12th 2008.

18) -----------, 2008. Post Judicial Powers Amendments to the 1945 Constitution. Papers on discussion public about Discourse Amendment Constitution which held byCommission Law National (KHN) in Jakarta Date 12 June 2008.

19) -----------, 2007. The decision of the Constitutional Court is not necessarily true in the Daily Circumstances Indonesia the 14th August 2007.

20) -----------, Politics Law Going to Development System Law National, Paperbe delivered on Seminar "Direction

21) Results amendment , which held by BPHN Dephuk HAM RI, in Jakarta, on 29-31 May 2006.

22) Miftahul Huda, Ultra Petita in Testing Laws , Journal of the Constitution vol 4 No3 (September 2007).

23) Pan Muhammad Faiz, Controlling Democracy Through Constitutional Review: Nine Pillars of Democracy Constitutional Court Ruling, Papers in the Book “UI for Nation ” The year 2009.

24) Rahardjo, satjipto. 2004. Paper Law Progressive (Exploration Something Idea) be delivered on see you alumni Program Doctor Knowledge Law University Diponegoro Semarang.

25) ---------. 2009. Layers in Studies Law. Banyumedia publishing. Poor.

26) ---------. 20 1 4. Towards Progressive Legal Products . Limited Discussion Paper on Faculty Law UNDIP. Semarang, June 24 20 1 4.

27) ----------, 2005. Progressive Law. Liberating Law. Progressive Law Journal, Vol. 1/No. 1/April 2005, PDIH UNDIP, Semarang.

28) ----------, 2007. Dissect Law Progressive . Book Compass. Jakarta.

29) ----------, 1980. Law and Society . Space. Bandung.

30) Ranuhandoko, IPM Legal Terminology, Second Printing, Jakarta: Sinar Graphic, 2000, Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1990. Methodology Study Law and jurimetry, : Ghalia

31) Indonesia, Jakarta.

32) Damn it, Maruarar. 2008. The 1945 Constitution as a Living Constitution . Secretariat General Court Constitution. Jakarta.

33) ----------, 2007. Aspect theoretical and Implementation Decision Court Constitution on Case Testing Act , Paper on Meeting Coordination Center Study Indonesian Constitution. Jakarta.

34) Sudijono SA, Progressive Legal Configuration, Journal of Law, Undip Faculty of Law, Vol. 8, No. 2,September 2005.

35) Soerjono Soekarno. 1986. Introduction Study Law . University Indonesia Pers.

36) Jakarta

37) strong, CF 1963. political constitution. Sidgwick and Jackson Ltd. London.

38) Ask, Bernard L., et al. 2006. Theory Law. Strategy Orderly Man Cross Room andgeneration , CV. WE: Surabaya.

39) Constitution Base Country Republic Indonesia Year 1945 In One Manuscript.Constitution Number 23 Year 2004 about Court Constitution.

40) Constitution Number 48 Year 2009 about Power Justice.

41) Constitution Number 10 Year 2004 about Formation Regulation Legislation-Invitation.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023