¹Ari Irawan,²Nasrudin Suyuti,³Syahrun,⁴Wa Ode Sifatu,⁵Lilik Rita Lindayani,⁶Bahtiar,⁷La Aso

¹Magister of Cultural Studies Study Program, Post-Graduate Program of Halu Oleo University,Kendari, Indonesia

^2,4Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Halu Oleo University,Kendari, Indonesia

³Department of Archeology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Halu Oleo University,Kendari, Indonesia

⁵Department of Language and Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Halu Oleo University,Kendari, Indonesia

⁶Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Halu Oleo University,Kendari, Indonesia

⁷English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Halu Oleo University,Kendari, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-79

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Arresting positions and career snapshots in selection bureaucrats is based on the principles of the merit system, namely staffing management in the bureaucracy which focuses more on aspects of competence and employee competition as a basis for recruiting and promoting employees in the ranks of the bureaucracy. This research aims to describe the forms of political hegemony after the election of the Head of Bombana Region in Bombana Regency of BAPPEDA Office, Southeast Sulawesi Province. This research is qualitative. This research was conducted in BAPPEDA Office of Bombana Regency, Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Data collection techniques used are observation, interviews, and documentation study. Data analysis techniques were carried out by collecting data, reducing data, presenting data (data display), and drawing conclusions. The results of this research showed that: The forms of political hegemony after the election of Bombana Regional Head in Bombana Regency BAPPEDA Office, Southeast Sulawesi Province, namely: (1) Increasing the discipline of civil servants, and (2) Increasing the loyalty of civil servants to Regional Head.

KEYWORDS:

Political hegemony, election, regional head

REFERENCES

1) Bachtiar, Harsya W. 1977. Pengamatan sebagai Suatu Metode. Jakarta: Gramedia.

2) Danim, Sudarwan. 2002. Menuju Peneliti Kualitatif, Ancangan, Metodologi; Presentasi, dan Publikasi Hasil Penelitian untuk Mahasiswa dan Peneliti Pemula Bidang Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan, dan Humaniora. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

3) Gulo, W. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian. Edisi kedua. Jakarta : Penerbit Gramedia Widiasarana

4) Marzuki (ed). 1987. Metode Riset. Yogyakarta: BPFC. Indonesia.

5) Miles, Matthew B. dan A. Michael Hubermas. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan: Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI Press.

6) Mulyana, Deddy. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Cetakan III. Bandung: PT Remeja Rosdakarya.

7) Strauss, Anselm & Juliet Corbin. 2003. Dasar-Dasar Penelitiam Kualitatif: Tata

8) Langkah dan Teknik-Teknik Teoritisasi Data (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

9) Sugiono. 1992. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

10) Wuisman, Jan J.J.M. 2013. Teori & Praktik: Memperoleh Kenyataan supaya Memperoleh Masa Depan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Jakarta.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023