VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023
1Bina Adi Prakosa,2Triana Rejekiningsih,3Akhmad Arif Musadad
1,2,3Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-83Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The lived experience of using educational technology is embedded in a specific social and cultural context. This study aims to investigate the meaning of the lived experience of the pesantren community using technology for education in their learning environment. This study used the hermeneutic phenomenology method to interpret the meaning of the experience of the pesantren community. Eight people from a pesantren for college students were purposively selected as participants. They were asked to describe their experiences using technology for education, how they used it, and what it meant for them. Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was then carried out to obtain interpretations of the meaning of the participant experiences. The analysis results reveal the meaning surrounding maintaining the pesantren subculture, the disruptive impact of technology, and the struggle for inclusion and social mobility. This study concludes that technology can be used to adapt the culture of pesantren education. The contribution of this research strengthens the theoretical implications of the linkages between educational technology and culture by providing empirical evidence from the experience of the pesantren community as a subculture.
KEYWORDS:Lived experience, educational technology, pesantren, subculture, phenomenology
REFERENCES
1) Aagaard, J. (2017). Introducing postphenomenological research: A brief and selective sketch of phenomenological research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(6), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1263884
2) Aagaard, J. (2018). Magnetic and multistable: Reinterpreting the affordances of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0088-4
3) Assa’idi, S. (2021). The growth of pesantren in Indonesia as the islamic venue and social class status of santri. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2021(93), 425–440. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14689/EJER.2021.93.21
4) Bajari, A., Wahyudin, U., Koswara, I., & Erlandia, D. R. (2021). The influence of android-based “islam sehat” application for traditional islamic boarding schools’ (Tibs) students in indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(4), 862–870. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.4.21
5) Benson, A. D. (2018). A Typology for Conducting Research in Culture, Learning and Technology. TechTrends, 62(4), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0267-8
6) Bradshaw, A. C. (2017). Critical pedagogy and educational technology. In Culture, Learning, and Technology: Research and Practice (pp. 8–27). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681689
7) Cilesiz, S. (2009). Educational Computer Use in Leisure Contexts: A Phenomenological Study of Adolescents’ Experiences at Internet Cafés. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 232–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323938
8) Cilesiz, S. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: Current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
9) Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). SAGE Publications.
10) Farid, A., & Lamb, M. (2020). English for Da’wah? L2 motivation in Indonesian pesantren schools. System, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102310
11) Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Yaqin, L. N., Parhanuddin, L., Razak, R. A., Nazry, N. N. M., Taridi, M., Karomi, K., & Fathurrijal, F. (2021). Mapping instructional barriers during covid-19 outbreak: Islamic education context. Religions, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010050
12) Halim, W. (2018). Young Islamic preachers on Facebook: Pesantren As’adiyah and its engagement with social media. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1416796
13) Hanafi, Y., Taufiq, A., Saefi, M., Ikhsan, M. A., Diyana, T. N., Thoriquttyas, T., & Anam, F. K. (2021). The new identity of Indonesian Islamic boarding schools in the “new normal”: The education leadership response to COVID-19. Heliyon, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06549
14) Hardaker, G., Sabki, A. A., & Iqbal, J. (2017). Perceptions of inequalities in access and usage of ICT in Islamic faith schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 881–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1296030
15) Hefner, C. (2022). Morality, religious authority, and the digital edge: Indonesian Muslim schoolgirls online. American Ethnologist, 49(3), 359–373. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13088
16) Hefner, R. W. (2019). Whatever Happened to Civil Islam? Islam and Democratisation in Indonesia, 20 Years On. Asian Studies Review, 43(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1625865
17) Isbah, M. F. (2020). Pesantren in the Changing Indonesian Context: History and Current Developments. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 8(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i1.5629
18) Istenic, A., & Lebenicnik, M. (2022). How Communion and Agentic Beliefs Predict Technology-Supported Formal and Informal Learning The Implications for Educational Technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(4), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i04.27249
19) Janawi, Ghozali, M. I., Habibi, I., & Afifulloh, M. (2022). Guru Kampong: The Existence Of Islamic Traditional Teacher In The Digital Platform Era. Res Militaris, 12(2), 2955–2964.
20) Jung, I., & Lee, J. (2020). A cross-cultural approach to the adoption of open educational resources in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12820
21) Lewin, D. (2016). The Pharmakon of Educational Technology: The Disruptive Power of Attention in Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9518-3
22) Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
23) Mukhibat, M., & Ghafar, M. (2019). Virtual pesantren: New trend of Islamic education model in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2), 105–117. Scopus.
24) Munifah, M., & Purwaningrum, S. (2022). Leadership strategy: Developing school culture through digital Turats learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(1), 68–80. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i1.6682
25) Nisa, E. F., & Saenong, F. F. (2022). Relegitimizing Religious Authority: Indonesian Gender-Just ʿUlamāʾ Amid COVID-19. Religions, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060485
26) Putra, A. L., Muchtarom, M., & Rejekiningsih, T. (2019). Using digital media in civics education learning subject to develop santri’s digital literacy at the age of technology disruption. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 818–823. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1115.0585C19
27) Roqib, M. (2021). Increasing social class through islamic boarding schools in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(2), 305–329. Scopus.
28) Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2020). Digital technology as a trigger for learning promises and realities. Digital Education Review, 37, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1344/DER.2020.37.195-207
29) Schmidt, L. (2018). Cyberwarriors and Counterstars: Contesting Religious Radicalism and Violence on Indonesian Social Media. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(1–2), 32–67. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340088
30) Subramony, D. P. (2017). Revisiting instructional technologists’ inattention to issues of cultural diversity among stakeholders. In Culture, Learning, and Technology: Research and Practice (pp. 28–43). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681689
31) Valentine, K. D., & Jensen, L. J. (2021). Mobile entanglements and communitas: The embodied nature of play in Pokémon Go. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1955–1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09930-x
32) Valentine, K. D., Kopcha, T. J., & Vagle, M. D. (2018). Phenomenological Methodologies in the Field of Educational Communications and Technology. TechTrends, 62(5), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0317-2
33) Van Manen, M. (2016a). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
34) Van Manen, M. (2016b). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge.
35) Wahid, K. H. A. (2001). Menggerakkan Tradisi; Esai-Esai Pesantren. LKis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=X71mDwAAQBAJ
36) Young, P. A., & Asino, T. I. (2020). Cultural Implications in Educational Technology: A Survey. In M. J. Bishop, E. Boling, J. Elen, & V. Svihla (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 263–283). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8_11
37) Zamhari, A., Han, M. I., & Zulkifli. (2021). Traditional religious authorities in new media: A study of the cariustadz.id platform as an alternative cyber fatwa and da’wah media among the middle-class urban muslims. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 21(1), 65–88. Scopus.