Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023
1Benediktus Hestu Cipto Handoyo, 2Giovanni Battista Maheswara
1Faculty of Law, Atma Jaya Yogyakarta University, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2Faculty of Law, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-100Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Constitutionally, the system of government chosen by the Indonesian people is a presidential system with a multiparty system. This system of government makes the President shackled by political parties when he wants to arrange the cabinet, which is his prerogative. This article will discuss the problem of how the zaken cabinet map of the multiparty presidential system in the perspective of scientific expertise or scientific approach/expertise approach can ve implemented side by side with the interests of coalition political parties in Indonesia. By using normative juridical analysis, it is concluded that the zaken cabinet map of the multiparty presidential system in the perspecive of scientific expertise or scientific approach/expertise approach can be implemented side by side with the interset of coalition political parties in Indonesia with minimum ratio of 32,35% (Thirty-two point thirty-five percent) filled by experts/professionals and the rest can be left to the political parties supporting the president / vice president as a manifestation of “political rewards”
KEYWORDS:Presidency, Multiparty, Zaken Cabinet
REFERENCES1) Asshiddiqie Jimly, 2010, Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
2) Budiardjo Miriam, 2015, Basics of Political Science, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
3) Dzulfikriddin M, 2010, Natsir in Indonesian Political History: The Role and Services of Mohammad Natsir in Two Indonesian Orders, Bandung: Mizan library.
4) Giddens Anthony, 1998, The Third Way The Third Way of Social Democracy Renewal, Jakarta: Gramedia.
5) Handoyo B. Hestu, 2015, Indonesian Constitutional Law, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
6) Haris, S. 2014, Parliamentary Practice of Indonesian Presidential Democracy, Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
7) Huntington P. Samuel, 1997, The Third Wave of Democracy, Jakarta: Grafiti
8) Nggilu Novendri M and Fence M, Wantu, 2020, Treading the Constitutional Path Toward Zaken Cabinet: An Effort to Realize a Constitutionally Qualified Government, Samudra Keadilan Journal 15, No.1, p.133, https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v15i1.1653
9) Rauf Maswadi, 2009, and friends, The Presidential System and the Ideal President, Yogyakarta: Student Library.
10) Remy Madinier, 2015, Islam and Politics in Indonesia : The Masyumi Party between Democracy and Integralism, Singapore : National University of Singapore.
11) Reja Fahlevi and Darul Huda Mustaqim, 2 April 2020, Collaboration of Zaken Cabinet and Coalition Cabinet in Cabinet Formation, Scientific Journal of Mimbar Demokrasi 19 No., p.49, https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v19i02.14939
12) Strong CF, 2008, Modern Political Constitutions: A Comparative Study of the History and Forms of Constitutions in the World, Bandung: Nusa Media, 2008.
13) Suparto, S, 2021, Implementation of the Presidential Government System with Multi Parties in Indonesia. SASI, 27, No. 4, pp. 529. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i4.600
14) Tri Widyanta I Gst Agung Ngurah Gede and Cokorda Dalem Dahana, 2020, Juridical Consequences of the Presidential Government System on the President's Prerogative Rights in Appointing Ministers According to the 1945 Constitution, Journal of Kertha Negara, 8 No. 6, pp. 28, https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/60711
15) Wijayanti Septi Nur and Kelik Iswandi, 2021, The Synergy of the Multiparty Presidency Cabinet during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia, Constitutional Journal 18, No.2, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1829