¹Risna Theresia Br Samosir, ²Dr. Joko Setiyono, S.H., M.Hum

^1,2Master of Laws, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-21

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The conflict that occurred between the European Union, which sued Indonesia at the WTO regarding the nickel export ban, is an issue that can be analyzed from an international law perspective. The analysis aims to examine the failure of the lawsuit against Indonesia's nickel export ban filed by the European Union and its implications under international trade law for Indonesia. This research adopts a normative legal research approach. The impacts felt by Indonesia due to the failure of the lawsuit filed by the European Union at the WTO include effects on mining downstream industries, consequences for foreign investors, and environmental impacts resulting from meeting nickel export demands. Consequently, in conclusion, the trade dispute between Indonesia and the European Union has not reached a final resolution. However, Indonesia hopes that the resolution of the trade dispute between Indonesia and the European Union does not escalate to the retaliation stage and ultimately results in a win-win solution for both parties.

KEYWORDS:

International Trade Law; Dispute Resolution and Impacts; Export Restrictions and Bans

REFERENCES
1) Alvian, I. V., & Abrianti, S. (2021). Analisis Terhadap Larangan Ekspor Bijih Nikel Kadar Rendah Berdasarkan Prinsip Restriksi Kuantitatif. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan, Vol. 3, p. 37.

2) Basri, H. (2011). Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasional Dalam Kerangka WTO (World Trade Organization). Jurnal Hukum Academia, Vol. 7, p. 29.

3) Bossche, P. (2008). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases, and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4) Cristhophorus, B. (2015). Seni Bersengketa di WTO (Diplomasi dari Pendekatan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa WTO Dilengkapi Contoh dan Analisa Beberapa Kasus Sengketa antara Indonesia dengan Beberapa Mitra Dagang Anggota WTO). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

5) Farra, N. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Perjanjian Perdagangan Internasional Terkait Aturan Pembatasan Dan Larangan Ekspor Oleh World Trade Organization (WTO) (Studi Perjanjian Antara Indonesia Dan Uni Eropa). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum, Vol. 1, p. 5.

6) Huala, A. (2004). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Nugroho Seno, A. (2022). Pembatasan Sebagai Solusi Pelarangan Ekspor Bahan Baku Nikel:

7) Studi Kasus Ekspor Bahan Baku Nikel Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Bea dan Cukai, Vol. 6, p. 15.

8) Prasudhi, I. (2007). Penanganan Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional Melalui WTO (World Trade Organization). Jurnal Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol. 5, p. 34.

9) Puspita, L. (2018). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa GATT dan WTO Ditinjau Dari Segi Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Jurnal Normative, Vol. 6, p. 27-28.

10) Ramadhiani, S. (2022). Pembatasan Ekspor Nikel: Kebijakan Nasional Vs Unfairness Treatment Hukum Investasi Internasional. Diakses dari https://lan.go.id/?p=10221

11) Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

12) Sood, M. (2012). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

13) Sood, M. (2005). Pengantar Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

14) Sri, V. (2019). Langkah Awal Memahami Hukum Perdagangan Internasional dalam Era Globalisasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.

15) Sugihilmi, T. (2022). Gugatan Uni Eropa di World Trade Organization (WTO) Mengancam HilirisasiIndustriPertambangandiIndonesia.Diaksesdarihttps://www.dkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil-kalbar/baca-artikel/15503/Gugatan-Uni-Eropa- di-World-Trade-Organization-WTO-Mengancam-Hilirisasi-Industri-Pertambangan-di- Indonesia.html

16) Triansyah, D. (2002). Sekilas WTO. Jakarta: Departemen Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia

Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023