Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023
1Fajar Arianto, 2Rina Harimurti, 3Unit Three Kartini, 4Dian Anita Nuswantara, 5Afifan Yulfadinata
1,2,3,4,5Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Surabaya & Surabaya
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-99Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Quality assurance in higher education is a necessity and obligation to maintain quality. Academic performance is a student's achievement during their education. Postgraduate academic performance in this research concerns the number of active students, GPA, and study period. The research method used is a documentation study in the academic information system as of February 2023 and as of August 2023 for 6 postgraduate study programs, consisting of 2 doctoral programs and 4 master's programs. Data analysis in this research describes documents and looks for trends with R2. The research results show that Quality Assurance has very little effect on the average length of study for postgraduate students; Quality Assurance has little effect on the number of active students; guarantees have a low effect on the average GPA of graduate students.
KEYWORDS:Quality assurance, academic performance, postgraduate, GPA, higher education
REFERENCES1) Ryan, T. (2015). Quality assurance in higher education: a review of literature. High. Learn. Res. Commun. , 5(4), 1-12.
2) Wilger, A. (1997). Quality assurance in higher education: a literature review. Stanford: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
3) Newton, J. (2000). Feeding the beast or improving quality?: Academics' perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring. Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 153-163,.
4) Harahap, M. S., Gultom, S., Darwin, Rosnelli, & Nasution, N. F. (2023). Kajian implementasi SPMI (sistem penjaminan mutu internal) sekolah dan perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Education and Development, 477-480.
5) Wijatno, S. (2009). Pengelolaan perguruan tinggi secara efisien, efektif, dan ekonomis untuk meningkatkan mutu penyelenggaraan pendidikan dan mutu lulusan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
6) Hedwig, R., & Polla, G. (2006). Model of quality assurance system and its application process in higher education. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
7) Ridwan, M., Suyono, H., & Sarosa, M. (2013). Penerapan data mining untuk evaluasi kinerja akademik mahasiswa menggunakan algoritma naive bayes classifier. Jurnal EECCIS , 59-64.
8) O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 971–990.
9) Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., & Valtanen, J. P. (2021). Deep and meaningful e-learning with social virtual reality environments in higher education: a systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 2412.
10) Brown, G. T. (2019). Is assessment for learning really assessment? Front. Educ, 1-7.
11) Rashid, N. Z., Ismail, T. N., & Thomas, B. (2021). The correlation between servqual dimensions and student satisfaction. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 7 - 19.
12) Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 111-133.
13) Makmun, N., Ismail, & Adnan. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran keanekaragaman hayati berbasis web di SMAN 6 Makassar dan SMAN 2 Maros. Biology Teaching and Learning, 143-150.
14) Jackson, S. L. (2009). Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach. Belmont: Wadsworth.
15) Reknati, P., & Sursina. (2019). Implementasi sistem penjamin mutu internal dalam meningkatkan mutu di sekolah tinggi ilmu pelayaran. Meteor STIP Marunda, 73–81.
16) Sulaiman, A., & Wibowo, U. B. (2016). Implementasi sistem penjaminan mutu internal Sebagai upaya meningkatkan mutu pendidikan di Universitas Gadjah Mada . Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 17-32.
17) Sumardjoko, B. (2010). Faktor-faktor determinan peran dosen dalam penjaminan mutu perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 294-310.
18) Bassey, B. A., Owan, V. J., & Agunwa, J. N. (2019). Quality assurance practices and students' performance evaluation in universities of South-South Nigeria: A structural equation modelling approach. British Journal of Psychological Research,, 1-13.
19) Hidayah, A., & Syahrani. (2022). Internal quality assurance system of education in financing standards and assessment standards. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 291~300.
20) Gora, A. A., Stefan, S. C., Popa, S. C., & Albu, C. F. (2019). Students’ perspective on quality assurance in higher education in the context of sustainability: A PLS-SEM Approach. Sustainability , 1-21.
21) Naylor, R., Dollinger, M., Mahat, M., & Khawaja, M. (2021). Students as customers versus as active agents: conceptualising the student role in governance and quality assurance. Higher Education Research & Development, 1026–1039.
22) Kappe, R., & Flier, H. v. (2012). Predicting academic success in higher education: what’s more important than being smart? European Journal of Psychology of Education , 605–619.
23) Meepradit, K., Auamnoy, T., & Leelakanok, N. (2022). Factors affecting GPA in higher education in asia: a systematic review. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 1581-1595.