¹Efraim Amba, ²Rina Djunita Pasaribu

^1,2First Program Study Magister of Management, Faculty of Economic and Business, Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i12-86

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Every company is required to be more agile in order to continue to survive and grow, so it is necessary to form a leaner and more agile work team to have a big impact on the company. The implementation of the agile approach needs to be evaluated as well as the level of project success of the agile team so that it is hoped that they can work more optimally. This research aims to find out and understand the implementation of the agile approach and the level of project success in the work teams that are formed. The variables that are the initial guide in conducting research are divided into the variables contained in the agile practice guide, namely the project life cycle, creating an agile environment, delivering products in an agile environment, organizational considerations. Apart from that, the research also explored the variables contained in the dimensions of project success. This research was carried out using a qualitative approach, collecting related documents and in-depth interviews conducted on the agile team which was the object of research. Next, to test the validity of the data, a member check process was carried out using data obtained from interviewees, namely leaders and agile team members. After processing and analyzing the data, it was discovered that the team did not fully implement the agile approach, including in relation to project approach objectives, project charter and team charter, location of work team members, and dependence on parties outside the team as well as in terms of the level of project success, including project effectiveness not being achieved, business and direct success in terms of cost savings has not been achieved, and new technology, products and market shares have not been created. The gaps that occur between theory and what is implemented in the field are expected to become input for further improvements.

KEYWORDS:

Agile project Management; Project Life Cycle; Project Charter; Team Charter; Location and freedom of work teams; Project Effectiveness; Project Cost Savings;

REFERENCES
1) Agilealliance. (2018, January 18. Agile 101. Retrieved from Agilealliance.org: https://www.agilealliance.org/agile101/

2) Beck, K. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Retrieved from agilemanifesto.org: https://agilemanifesto.org/iso/id/principles.html

3) Catlin, R., & Watkins, C. (2021). Agile Auditing : Fundamental and Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

4) Cho , L. (2009). Adopting an Agile Culture : A User Experience Team’s Journey. Agile Conference, 416-421. doi:10.1109/AGILE.2009.76

5) CIAS. (2021, December 05). CIAS. Retrieved March 16, 2023, from https://www.cias.co/: https://www.cias.co/post/apa-itu-agile-mengenal-agile-tujuan-serta-kelebihan-dan-kekurangannya

6) Conforto, E., Salum, F., Amaral, D., Silva, S., & Almeida, L. (2014). Can Agile Project Management Be Adopted by Industries Other than Software Development? Project Management Journal, 21-34.

7) Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Chosing Among Five Approaches (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publication Ltd.

8) David, F. (2011). Strategic Management : Concepts and Cases. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

9) Dierendonck, D. V. (2011). Servant Leadership : A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management, 909-1289.

10) Doerr, J. (2018). Measure What Matters : how Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation rock the world with OKRs. New York: Bennett Group, LLC.

11) Fernandez, D. J., & Frenandez, J. D. (2016). Agile Project Management - Agilism versus Traditional Approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 10:17.

12) Iskandar, A. (2021). Strategic Management Using OKR. Jakarta: PT. Alex Media Komputindo.

13) Jaya, I. M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif : Teori, Penerapan, dan Riset Nyata. Yogyakarta: Anak Hebat Indonesia.

14) Kahn, R. L., & Cannell, C. F. (1957). The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

15) Lalic, D., Lalic, B., Delic, M., Gracanin, D., & Stefanovic, D. (2021). Howproject management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile. Emerald, 494-520. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-04-2021-0108

16) Layton, M., Ostermiller, S., & Kynaston, D. (2020). Agile Project Management For Dummies (3rd ed.). Hoboken, Hudson, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

17) Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Ohio: Prentice Hall.

18) Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication.

19) McKeever, C. (2006). The Project Charter – Blueprint for Success. The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 6-9.

20) Muller, J. (2022, February 10). Objectives and Key Results (OKR) - A Definition. Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://www.workpath.com: https://www.workpath.com/magazine/okr-definition

21) Niven, P., & Lamorte, B. (2016). Objective and Key Results_Driving Focus, Alignment, and Enggagement with OKRs. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States of America: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.

22) Olszewski, M. (2023). Agile project management as a stage for creativity: a conceptual framework of five creativity-conducive spaces. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.

23) Olszewski, M. (2023). Agile project management as a stage for creativity: a conceptual framework of five creativity-conducive spaces. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 100.

24) Project Management Institute. (2017). Agile Practice Guide. Pennsylvania, United State of America: Project Management Institute, Inc.

25) PT Telekomunikasi Selular. (2022). 2021 Annual Report : Open A World of More. Jakarta: Telkomsel.

26) Reed, L., Cohen, D. V., & Colwell, S. (2011). A New Scale to Measure Executive Servant Leadership: Development, Analysis, and Implications for Research. Springer, 421-422.

27) Rogers, D. L. (2016). The Digital Transformation Playbook : Rethink Your Business. New York: Columbia University Press.

28) Sarosa, S. (2021). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Sleman: PT Kanisius.

29) Sathe, C. A., & Panse, C. (2023). Analyzing the impact of agile mindset in adoption on software development teams productivity during COVID-19. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 96-115.

30) Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. (2015). Does Agile work?_A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Elsevier APM and IPMA, 1040-1051. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006.

31) Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: the Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

32) Sowaidan, A. (2016). The Impact of Agile Project Management on the Effective Delivery of Innovative Products. Dubai: British University.

33) Stray, V., Ulfsnes, R., Gundelsby, J. H., & Moe, N. B. (2022). How agile teams make Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) work. International Conference on Software and System Processes and International Conference on Global Software Engineering (pp. 104-109). Pittsburgh: ACM.

34) Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.

35) Thesinga, T., Feldmanna, C., & Burchard, M. (2021). Agile versus Waterfall Project Management : Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Elsevier, 746-756.

36) Wheelen, T., Hunger, J., Hoffman, A., & Bamford, C. (2018). Strategic Management and Business Policy : Globalization, Innovation, and Sustainability (Vol. 15th). London: Pearson Education Limited.

37) Wilkinson, N., & Moran, J. (1998). Team Charter. The TQM Magazine, 355-361.

Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2023