VOlUME 06 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2023
1Bong Hendri Susanto,2Hugo Vidhitasmoro,3Karina Erlyn Gladys Lumempouw,
4Rosalia Onlyvia Citara Dewi,5Elisabeth Sundari
1,2,3,4Students of Postgraduate Faculty Of Law Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5Lecturer Faculty Of Law Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i2-04Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The Indonesian government has passed Law 11 of 2020 on Job Creation to improve the investment ecosystem. The changes include the making of a deed of transfer of land rights, which has been made on the condition that the parties must appear before the Notary as land deed officials in person, to be made in electronic form. This step is not accompanied by an amendment to Article 5 paragraph 4 letter (b) of Law 11 of 2008 concerning ITE, which still determines that the provisions regarding ITE do not apply to letters and documents which according to the Law must be made in the form of notarial deeds or deeds made by PPAT. This research is conducted to provide legal solutions from the point of view of Legal Theory on the conflict between the 2 norms. This research is normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that based on the principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, the Job Creation Law must be applied over the ITE Law as far as how to make PPAT deeds made electronically are valid legal evidence if the making of electronic notarial deeds is carried out in accordance with applicable provisions.
KEYWORDS:Deed, Evidentiary Power, Electronically, Land Deed Official
REFERENCES
1) Ichsan, November 25. (2022). Perkembangan Teknologi Jaringan Seluler 1G, 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G. https://sasanadigital.com/perkembangan-jaringan-mobile-network-dari-masa-ke-masa-1g-ke-5g/
2) Kemenkum HAM RI (tanpa tahun), Layanan Publik. https://www.kemenkumham.go.id/layanan-publik-2.
3) Salim.H.S. (2019). Teknik Pembuatan Akta PPAT. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.
4) Azizah, Nur, Abdul Halim Barkatullah dan Noor Hafidah. (2022). Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Secara Elektronik (Studi di Kantor PPAT Wilayah Banjarmasin Utara). Notary Law Journal Vol 1 Issue 2 April 2022
5) Baharudin. (2014). Kewenangan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (Ppat) Dalam Proses Jual, Keadilan Progresif, Volume 5 Nomor 1.
6) Gaol, Selamat Lumban. (2019). Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Berdasarkan Hukum Tanah Nasional, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara–Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma, Volume 10 No. 1, ISSN 2656-4041.
7) Sundary, Rini lrianti, 20 April 2018. https://www.unisba.ac.id/masalah-hukum-pembuatan-akta-notaris-secara-elektronik/
8) Kharisma, Bella, I Gede Agus Kurniawan. (2022). Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti: Urgensi Harmonisasi Kebijakan, Udayana Master Law Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, P-ISSN:,2302-528X.
9) Setiadewi, Kadek, I Made Hendra Wijaya. (2020) Legalitas Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary Sebagai Akta Otentik, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol. 6 No 1, ISSN : 2356-4164.
10) Atmaja, Prayudicia Tantra. (2019). Keabsahan Akta Notaris Secara Elektronik Dalam E-Commerce. Tesis. UNS.
11) Sundani, Tiska. (2017). Analisis Hukum atas Penggunaan dan Pembuatan Akta Notaris secara Elektronik. Tesis. Universitas Sumatera Utara. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/42590.
12) Wiranata, A. R. (2021). Analisis Pembuatan Akta Notaris Secara Elektronik. Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan keagamaan, 19, (1),408-421.
13) Ali, Salim Ibrahim, Zuryati Mohamed Yusoff, Zainal Amin Ayub. (2017). Legal Research of Doctrinal and Non-Doctrinal, International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, Volume 4(1), pp.493-495.
14) European Justice, 08/10/2020, Key Principles. https://e-justice.europa.eu/383/EN/principles_and_stages. Accesed Agustus, 10, 2022.
15) Family Mediation Council. (2022). General Principles of Mediators and Mediation. https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/us/code-practice/general-principles/. Accesed January, 17, 2023.
16) Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2013). Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta. Penerbit Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
17) Mertokusumo, Sudikno (1988). Mengenal Hukum, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
18) Rasjidi, Lili, Ira Thania Rasjidi. (2018). Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
19) Nurfaqih, Irfani. (2020). Asas Lex superior, Lex Specialis, dan Les Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16 (3).
20) Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2012). Teori Hukum, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka
21) Manan, Bagir. (2004). Hukum Positif Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UII Press.
22) Sundari, E & Candera. (2019). Praktek Penanganan Perkara Perdata, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
23) Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
24) Makarim, Edmon. (2021). Layanan Notaris Secara Elektronik dalam Kedaruratan Kesehatan Masyarakat. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. https://law.ui.ac.id/layanan-notaris-secara-elektronik-dalam-kedaruratan-kesehatan-masyarakat-oleh-dr-edmon-makarim-s-kom-s-h-ll-m/
25) Guntoro, Jefri, Emelia Kontesa, Herawan Sauni. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Pendaftaran hak Tanggungan Dalam Pelayanan hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik, Bengkoelen Justice, Vol.10 No.2. Https://Doi.Org/10.33369/J_Bengkoelenjust.V10i2.13806. Hlmn 212-225.
26) Pokja Penyusunan BPHN. (2020) Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Ham. Dokumen pembangunan Hukum Nasional, Jakarta: BPHN.