VOlUME 06 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2023
Oksana Chaika
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 15, Heroyiv Oborony St., Kyiv 03041, Ukraine.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i2-74Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of reflective practice in foreign language teaching and learning (FLT) through the lens of multicultural education. The paper outlines three main objectives: (1) to provide an overview of reflective practice in FLT and its intersection with multicultural education, (2) to examine the methodology of using reflective practice in FLT within a multicultural context, and (3) to discuss key conclusions on the benefits of using reflective practice in FLT and multicultural education. The paper begins by providing an overview of reflective p ractice and its application in FLT, emphasizing the importance of reflective practice in enhancing learners' language proficiency, self-awareness, and metacognitive skills. The paper also highlights the role of reflective practice in promoting intercultural competence and understanding, which is a key component of multicultural education. Next, the article examines the methodology of using reflective practice in FLT within a multicultural context, discussing how teachers can incorporate reflective practice into their instructional practices, and outlining different approaches to reflective practice, such as journal writing, peer feedback, and group discussion. The paper also considers challenges that may arise when using reflective practice in multicultural FLT, such as overcoming language barriers or addressing cultural biases. Finally, the key conclusions explain the benefits of using reflective practice in FLT and multicultural education. It is argued that reflective practice can enhance learners' language proficiency and intercultural competence, as well as promote their motivation to learn. It is as well highlighted to see the potential benefits of using reflective practice for language teachers, such as improving their instructional practices and facilitating their professional development. In conclusion, it is proposed that reflective practice is an effective methodology for enhancing FLT and promoting intercultural competence within a multicultural context. It is recommended that FLT teachers incorporate reflective practice into their instructional practices, and that teacher training programs include training on reflective practice and multicultural education. Future research should focus on exploring the most effective approaches to using reflective practice in FLT and multicultural education, as well as investigating the potential impact of reflective practice on learners' long-term language proficiency and intercultural competence.
KEYWORDS:reflective practice, foreign language teaching and learning, FLT, multicultural education, intercultural competence, language proficiency, methodology, instructional practices, teacher training, self-awareness, metacognitive skills, motivation, professional development.
REFERENCES
1) Bailey, K. M. (2015). Practical research for education: Reflective practice in action. Routledge.
2) Banks, J. A. (2001). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
3) Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
4) Byram, M. (2018). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
5) Byram, M., & Wagner, M. (2018). Intercultural competence and foreign language education. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-7). John Wiley & Sons.
6) Chaika, O. (2022). Technology of Dialogic Interaction as a Means of Fostering Polyculturalism with Future Foreign Language Teachers. Humanitarian Studios: Pedagogics, Psychology, Philosophy, 13 (3), 103-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog13(3).2022.103-111
7) Chaika, O. (2022). Poly- / multicultural education in foreign language teaching. International Journal of Philology, 13 (2), 99-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/philolog2022.02.010.
8) Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching: Motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.
9) Dvoržáková, I., & Pavlíčková, J. (2016a). Intercultural competence development through reflective teaching in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(1), 7-24.
10) Dvoržáková, I., & Pavlíčková, J. (2016b). Reflective teaching as a means to developing intercultural competence in foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(3), 101-117.
11) Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
12) Farrell, T. S. C., & Bennis, K. (2013). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re)discovering the value of experience in foreign language teaching. System, 41(2), 186-195.
13) Fukuda, A., & Chujo, K. (2019). Reflective journals in a Japanese university EFL course: A window into students' self-awareness and metacognitive skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(6), 1235-1249.
14) Fukuda, A., & Chujo, K. (2019). Reflective practice in foreign language teacher education: What is it and how can it be implemented? System, 81, 41-50.
15) Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
16) Hrycyk, O. (2018a). Reflective practice as a means of developing intercultural communicative competence in future language teachers in Ukraine. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 310-326.
17) Hrycyk, O. (2018b). Reflective practice as a tool for developing intercultural communicative competence in future language teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(25), 72-78.
18) Hrycyk, O. (2018c). Developing intercultural communicative competence of future language teachers through reflective practice. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(3), 430-438.
19) Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296-311.
20) Kramsch, C., & Sullivan, P. (1996). Appropriate pedagogy. ELT Journal, 50(3), 199-212.
21) Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. L. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and Language Teaching (pp. 83-100). Routledge.
22) Mohamad, S., & Hssein, R. (2020). The impact of task-based language teaching on the development of intercultural communicative competence: A case study of EFL learners. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 8(4), 205-220.
23) Osman, G., & Al-Shboul, M. (2016). Challenges of promoting intercultural competence through reflective practices: A case study from the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(3), 445-454.
24) Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
25) Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005).
26) Wei, L. (2020a). Multicultural education and foreign language teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1-18.
27) Wei, W. (2020b). Reflection and intercultural communication in Chinese foreign language education. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(1), 18-32.
28) Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2019). An analysis of reflective practice in Chinese language teaching from the perspective of multicultural education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 307-315.