¹Hasyim Mahmud Wantu,²Novianty Djafri,³Nina Lamatenggo,⁴Masri Kudrat Umar

¹Doctoral Student at State University of Gorontalo and Lecturer at the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, State Islamic University of Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia

^2,3,4Lecturer at State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i5-31

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

In education, learning models are a topic that should be investigated because it is both relevant and intriguing. This research aims to conduct a literature review on learning models that have been created and implemented in various educational settings. A literature review is a process that is used, comprised of collecting related articles from the available database. According to the findings of this research project, numerous learning models have been established over time. Some examples of these models include social interaction models, information processing models, personal models, behavior modification models, problem-based models, and component display theory models. The findings of this research point to the conclusion that these learning models are adaptable and may be utilized in various educational settings. This adaptability is contingent on the learning goals as well as the characteristics of the learners. The contribution of this research is to offer guidance to educators and researchers about selecting the appropriate learning model which should be implemented in various learning environments.

KEYWORDS:

social interaction model, information procession model, personal model, behavioral modification model, problem- based learning, component display theory learning model

REFERENCES

1) Amin, A. A. N. (2016). Konsep Desain Pembelajaran.

2) Badiran, M. (2004). Componen Display Theory pada Pembelajaran Seni Rupa. Jurnal Seni Rupa FBS- UNIMED. 1(2), 69-81

3) Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.

4) Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.

5) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77- 101.

6) Cahyanto, B. et al. (2020). Electronic Module (E-Module) Berbasis Component Display Theory (CDT) untuk Mata Kuliah Pembelajaran Terpadu. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran) Kajian dan Riset dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran 7(1): 49-56

7) Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 1-44.

8) Galvan, J. L. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. Routledge.

9) Gardner, J. W. (2007). Problem Based Learning.

10) Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.

11) Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101-117.

12) Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage publications.

13) Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Sage.

14) Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review,

16(3), 235-266.

15) Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

16) Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

17) Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. ASCD.

18) Merrill, M. D. (2018). A Lesson Based on The Component Display Theory. London: Routlegde

19) Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Sage publications.

20) Oka, G. P. A. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Interaktif Berbasis Component Display Theory (CDT) pada Mata Kuliah Multimedia Jurusan Teknologi Pendidikan FIP Undiksha, Ejurnal Imedtech. 1(1).

21) Rahmat, A. (2014). Pengantar Pendidikan: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing

22) Reigeluth, C.M., Merril, M.D., dan Bodderson, C. V. (1974). The Slructure v of Subject Matter Content and Its Instructional Design Implication. Instructional Science

23) Setyosari, P. (2006). Belajar Berbasis Masalah (Problem Based Learning). Makalah Disampaikan dalam Pelatihan Dosen-Dosen PGSD FIP UNY di Malang

24) Snelbecker, G. E. (1984}. Lear-ning Theory and -Instructional, Thea_ry and Psychoeducational Design. New York: Mc·Oraw Hill.

25) Steller, A. W. (1983). Curriculum Palanning. Fundamental Curriculum Decisions, ASCD, Virginia.

26) Uno, H. B. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 05 MAY 2023