VOlUME 06 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023
Norbertus Simon
Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University; Jl. Dukuh Kupang XXV/54 Surabaya
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i6-16Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Article entitled Bank Responsibility for Objects of Mortgage Auctions That Cannot Be Controlled by the Auction Winners. The transaction process for the transfer of land and building rights through an auction is quite easy and simple. As long as the parties involved fulfill their respective rights and obligations in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations. Based on the explanation of Article 20 paragraph (1) of Minister of Finance Regulation Number 213/06.PMK/2020 regarding instructions for implementing auctions, auctions must run efficiently, effectively and provide legal certainty. This study aims to develop knowledge regarding bank responsibilities and legal protection for buyers of goods who are unable to exercise control over the object of the mortgage execution auction object. The form of research used in this research is normative, which is researched on legal principles, which are carried out on positive laws made in writing. The conclusion of this study: The bank is fully responsible for the juridical and physical leveraging of the auction object to the auction winner, based on Article 17 of the 2016 Auction Guidelines and Article 13 of the 2020 Auction Guidelines stating that the Seller, in this case Bank X, is responsible for the delivery of movable objects and/or immovable objects. Because basically, the law has regulated that the seller is obliged to guarantee the possession of the goods being sold safely and securely to the buyer. This form of accountability can be in the form of providing mediation so that the debtor wants to vacate the auction object voluntarily or by providing proper direction and coordination to the buyer to apply for an emptying execution or if as a last option, namely by returning payment of the auction price paid by the auction buyer. So that in the future the bank can facilitate the levering process and participate in guaranteeing the mastery of the collateral to hand over the auction object as a form of accountability, it is necessary to make a statement stating that if the debtor defaults, the debtor is obliged to voluntarily vacate the land and building of the mortgage, so that in the future the bank can obtain convenience in handing over the auction object and is also free from claims for compensation filed by the buyer.
KEYWORDS:responsibility; bank; auction; mastery
REFERENCES
1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Lembaran Negara No. 75 Tahun 1959, Berita Negara
No. 69 Tahun 1959 dan Perubahannya.
2) Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan. Lembaran Negara No. 42 Tahun 1996, Tambahan
Lembaran Negara No. 3632.
3) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara No. 157 Tahun
2009, Tambahan Lembaran Negara No. 5076.
4) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
5) Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
6) Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 27/PMK.06/2016 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Lelang. LN No. 166, TLN No.
4916 Tahun 2016.
7) Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 213/PMK.06/2020 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Lelang. LN No. 98, TLN No 4916
Tahun 2020.
8) Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar
Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2016 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan.
9) Putusan Nomor 40/DJU/SK/HM.02.3/1/2019 tentang Pedoman Eksekusi Pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta.
10) A.Y. Dhaniarto, 2021, Lelang Teori dan Aplikasi, Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
11) Adolf Warouw, 1998, “Optimalisasi Pengurusan Piutang Negara dengan Mengefektifkan Pemanfaatan Sarana Hukum
yang Ada,” Kumpulan Jurnal dan Diskusi Panel I sampai IV Pengurusan Piutang dan Lelang Negara, Departemen
Keuangan dan BUPLN, Jakarta.
12) Ahmad Miru, 2010, Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
13) Andi Hamzah, 2005, Kamus Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
14) Artikel DJKN, www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/10264/Pentingnya-Status-Tanah-Clear-and-Clean-untuk-
Penilaian-Real-Property-Dalam-Rangka-Pemindahtanganan.html, 4 Mei 2020.
15) Habib Adjie, 2015, Bahan Bacaan Mahasiswa Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Sebelas Maret
Surakarta, Surabaya, h. 20.
16) https://www.google.com/search?q=google+translate+belanda+to+indonesia&rlz=1C1C
HBFenID839ID839&oq=goog&aqs=chrome.1.69i60j69i59l3j46i67i131i199i433i465j69i60l3.2669j0j7&sourceid=chrom
e&ie=UTF-8, diakses pada tanggal 21 Juni 2022, Pukul 01.21 WIB.
17) Munir Fuandy, 1996, Hukum Perkreditan Temporer, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
18) Rachmadi Usman, 2003, Aspek Hukum Perbankan Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
19) Rachmadi Usman, 2019, Hukum Lelang, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
20) Retnowulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, 1998, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, Cetakan
Kesebelas, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
21) Riduan Syahrani, 2000, Seluk Beluk dan Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian, Alumni, Bandung.
22) Riduan Syahrani, 2010, Seluk Beluk dan Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian, Alumni, Bandung.
23) Rosa Agustina, 2003, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Penerbit Pasca Sarjana FH UI, Jakarta.
24) Soerjono Soekanto, 2006, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
25) Sri Mamudji, et.al., 2005, Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas
Indonesia, Jakarta.
26) Subekti, 2001, Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia, Pustaka Yutisia, Jakarta.
27) Titik Triwulan, 2010, Hukum Perdata dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.