Dwi Tatak Subagiyo

Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University; Jl. Dukuh Kupang XXV No. 54 Post Code 60225

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i6-23

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aims to find out the form of criminal responsibility for members of the TNI who commit crimes and the efforts of TNI deserters who commit criminal acts of desertion to reunite. This research is a normative research which seeks to study and explore and find answers about what should be from every problem based on norms, not examining social phenomena that occur as a result of legislation. The approach used in this study is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This approach is used because in solving the problems in this study, it will refer to existing and related laws. The results of this study indicate that this form of criminal responsibility can be in the form of a crime of desertion of goods which is a basic crime of imprisonment regulated in article 6a paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code. And additional punishment in the form of dismissal from military service, this is regulated in paragraph 1 of Article 6b of the Criminal Procedure Code. And efforts that can be made by military deserters who commit these crimes are asked to be accompanied by a lawyer to help resolve the deserters' problem completely.

KEYWORDS:

criminal responsibility; desertion; military

REFERENCES

Legislation:
1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Citra Umbara, Bandung, 2006.

2) Markas Besar TNI Angkatan Darat Direktorat Hukum. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Militer : Jakarta, 1985.

3) Markas Besar TNI Angkatan Darat Direktorat Hukum. Kitab Undang-Undang Disiplin Militer : Jakarta,1999.

4) Markas Besar TNI Angkatan Darat Direktorat Hukum. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer, 1999.

Books:
1) Ali, Zainudin, 2009, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

2) C.S.T.Kansil dan Christine S.T. Kansil,2004, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

3) Harahap, M. Yahya, 2000, Pembahasan dan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

4) Moeljatno, 2000, Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara, Jakarta.

5) Mulyono, 2007, Unsur-Unsur Tindak Pidana. Erlangga, Jakarta.

6) Salam, Moch. Faisal, 2002, Hukum Acara Peradilan Militer di Indonesia, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

7) Saleh. Roeslan, 1983, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

8) Samego, Indria, 2002, TNI di Era Perubahan, Erlangga, Jakarta.

9) Siantury, 1989, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Alumni AHM PTHM, Jakarta.

10) Siantury, 1985, Hukum Pidana Militer di Indonesia, Alumni AHM PTHM, Jakarta.

11) Sjarif, Amiroedin, 1996, Hukum Disiplin Militer Indonesia, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

12) Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 1985, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Website:
1) Kamus Istilah Militer. http: www. Googlesearch.com. Diakses tanggal 5 Agustus 2022 Pukul 11.22.46

2) www.dilmil-surabaya.go.id. Diakses tanggal 18 Oktober 2022 Pukul 12.30.55

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023