JUNE 2023

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023
The Effects of Using Peer Feedback through Padlet on EFL Students’ Email Writing and Their Learning Motivation
1Dung My Thi Nguyen,2Nguyen Huynh Trang
School of Foreign Languages, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City59 C Nguyen Dinh Chieu District 3 Ho Chi Minh City
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i6-24

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Peer feedback has been ubiquitous in language learning, especially in writing skills. With the integration of technology in English education, peer feedback through digital tools can be a replacement for traditional classroom activities. This study investigated the effects of using peer feedback through Padlet on the email writing of EFL students and their learning motivation. Two groups of participants were recruited: 32 control non-English majors and 34 experimental ones in a university in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Their English proficiency was homogeneous at the pre-intermediate level. Throughout six sessions of instruction, the experimental group practiced writing and giving peer feedback on the Padlet platform while the control group learned conventionally. Data were obtained through pretest and posttest; besides, semi-structured interviews were employed to gather information on students’ learning motivation. The results indicated that the use of peer feedback on Padlet was a great technique that could be applied to enhance EFL students’ email writing. Furthermore, students’ motivation in writing was also increased due to the integration of Padlet.

KEYWORDS:

peer feedback, Padlet, writing, motivation.

REFERENCES

1) Algraini, F, N, A. (2014). The effect of using Padlet on enhancing EFL writing performance [Master’s thesis, Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University].
https://awej.org/images/Theseanddissertation/FarahNasserAlgraini/farahalgrainifullthesis.pdf

2) Bijami, M. (2013). Peer feedback in learning English writing: advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(4), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v3i4.4314

3) Betty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning (2nd Ed). Pearson Longman.

4) Blake, R. J. (2012). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.

5) Defilippi, M. T. A., Miller, K. L., & Ramirez-Avila, M. R (2020). Collaboration to improve descriptive writing facilitated by Padlet: an EFL action research study. Atoz: Novas Práticas Em Informação E Conhecimento, 9(1), 54-6. https://doi.org/1.5380/atoz.v9i1

6) Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009009018235

7) Fadillah, S. N. (2021). The students’ perception on the use of Padlet in improving writing skills. Wiralodra English Journal, 5(2), 50–6. https://doi.org/1.31943/wej.v5i2.142

8) Fraenkel, J, R., Wallen, N, E., & Huyn, H, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities.

9) Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology in second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.

10) Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C.A. Macarthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 144-157). The Guilford Press. http://doi.org/1.1177/0033688220925927

11) Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/1.1017/CBO9780511667251

12) Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/1.1017/S0261444806003399

13) Mulyadi, E., Naniwarsih, A., Omolu, F. A., Manangkari, I., & Amiati, D. R. (2021). The application of Padlet in teaching and learning of writing recount text at senior high school in Palu city. In Saefurrohman, M. Muhammad & H. Nurdiyanto (Eds.), AECon2020: Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Education and Science Conference (pp. 446-456). European Alliance for Innovation. https://doi.org.10.4108/eai.19-12-2020.2309182

14) Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classroom. Prentice Hall.

15) Okmawati, M., & Tiarina, Y. (2022). A comparative study on the implementation of Padlet and Jamboard toward students’ motivation. In 5th International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE-5 2022) (pp. 367-375). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org.10.2991/978-2-494069-85-5_39

16) Putman, M. (2014, Aug 08). Creating collaborative spaces using Padlet. International Literacy Association. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/blog%2Fliteracy-now%2F2014%2F08%2F08%2Fcreating-collaborative-spaces- using-padlet

17) Rashid, A. A., Yunus, M. M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using Padlet for collaborative writing among ESL learners. Creative Education, 10, 610-62. https://doi.org/1.4236/ce.2019.103044

18) Reiss, D. (1995, March 24). Letter writing and new literacies for nontraditional students [Paper Presentation]. Conference on College Composition and Communication Annual Meeting, Washington. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED387816

19) Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/1.1017/CBO9780511667190

20) Suryani, I., & Daulay, S. H. (2022). Students’ perceptions on writing activities by using Padlet application. The Proceedings of English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT), 11(1), 175–188. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/eltlt/article/view/1658

21) Susanti, N. I., & Ayuni, M. (2018). The students’ perception towards the use of Padlet in L2 writing. International Summit on Science Technology and Humanity (ISETH), 30-37. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/11657

22) Taufikurohman, I. (2018). The effectiveness of using Padlet in teaching writing descriptive text. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 2(2), 71-88. https://doi.org/1.25157/jall.v2i2.2190

23) Thai, N. H. T., & Nguyen, T. N. (2022). The impact of collaborative writing via Padlet on students’ writing performance and their attitudes. The Proceedings of Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Sciences (HCMCUJS), 17(2), 25-39. https://doi.org/1.46223/HCMCOUJS.proc.vi.17.2.2514.2022

24) Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
https://doi.org/1.1080/01443410500345172

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar