¹Yasminingrum,²Sri Retno Widyorini,

^1,2Faculty of Law UNTAG Semarang

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i6-85

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

Reforms are corrective steps in all aspects of life to create a better order based on the values of Pancasila. The reform movement that began in 1988 in Indonesia was launched by students and intellectual groups who saw that there had been deviations from Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, resulting in the fall of the President who was in power then. This reform movement can be said to be the second movement after the first movement, namely in 1966 whose goal was to overthrow the President who was seen as having deviated from the values of Pancasila and the mechanisms of the 1945 Constitution. This discussion aims to prevent the reality of the fading understanding, appreciation, and practice of Pancasila values in people's lives. For this reason, the will of the reform era needs to be maintained, rearranged, and given clear and firm legal guidelines so that the administration of government will no longer deviate from the values of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution with all its changes based on substance, structure and legal culture.

KEYWORDS:

Pancasila, Reform, Law

REFERENCES

1) Darji Darmodiharjo & Sidharta, 1996, Penjabaran Nilai Nilai Pancasila Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, PT Raja Gravindo Persada, Jakarta, hlm 52.

2) Bachan Mustafa, 2016, Sistem Hukum Indonesia Terpadu, Citra Aditya bakti, Bandung, hlm 96.

3) Moh Kusnadi dan Harmaily Ibrahim, 1983, Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Pusat Studi Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, hlm 99. Jakarta:

4) Soeharto, 1976, Pandangan Presiden Soeharto Tentang Pancasila, Yayasan Proklamasi, Center For Strategic And International Studies (CSIS), Jakarta, hlm 13. Jakarta:

5) Satjipto Rahardjo, 1979, Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial, Alumni, Bandung, hlm 25-26.

6) Lawrence M Friedman, 2011, The Legal System : A Social Science Perspective, diterjemahkan oleh M Khosin dengan judul Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial, Nusa Media, Bandung hlm 49.

7) Esmi warasih, 2005, Pranata Sebuah Telaah Sosiologi, PT Suryandaru Utama, Semarang, hal 89.

8) Dardji Darmodihardjo dan Sidharta, log cit, hlm 154.

9) Hans Kelsen, 2015, Teori Hukum Murni, Dasar dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif, Nusa Media, Bandung, hlm 244.

10) H Juniarso Ridwan & Achmad Sodik Sudrajat, 2014, Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Kebijakan Layanan Publik, Nuansa Cedikia, Bandung hlm 77.

11) Dwiyanto, 2008, Kinerja Tata Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia, PSKK UGM, Jogjakarta, hlm 10.

12) Soerjono Soekanto, 1989, Fungsi Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, hlm 47-48.

13) Lawrence M. Freidman, 2009, log cit,hlm 12-19.

14) Hans Kelsen, 2007, General Theory Of Law And State (Alih Bahasa Sumardi, Teori Hukum Umum Dan Negara, Dasar Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Deskritif Imperatif, BEE Media Indonesia, Jakarta, hlm 16.

15) Abdullah, 2008, Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Pengadilan, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Sunan Giri, Sidoarjo, hlm 11.

16) Hans Kelsen, 2011, General Theory of Law and State, diterjemahkan oleh Rasisul Mutaqien, Nusa Media, Bandung, hlm 7.

17) Nasikun, 1974, Sebuah Pendekatan Untuk Mempelajari Sistem Sosial Indonesia, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik UGM, Jogjakarta, hlm 31.

18) Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1985, Studi Hukum Dan Masyarakat, Alumni, Bandung, hal. 80.

19) Hans Kelsen, 2011, log cit, hlm 3-4.

20) Muchtar Kusumaatmdja, Teori Hukum Pembangunan Eksistensi Dan Implikasi, Epistema Institute, Epistama Dan Huma, Jakarta, TTH, hal 19.

21) Moh. Mahfud MD, 2011, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi, LP3ES Indonesia, Jakarta hal 271.

22) Maria Farida Indrati S, 2011, Ilmu Perundang-undangan, Jenis, Fungsi, Dan Materi Muatan, Cet.5, Yogjakarta, hal 2.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2023