¹Ach. Resa Fachrizi,²Nur Fathin Luaylik,³Achmad Imam

^1,2,3Faculty of Public Administration Science, Universitas Madura

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-46

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The existence of MSMEs in Sampang Regency is not all MSMEs can be fostered by related agencies. The existing problems includes weaknesses in access to information, lack of infrastructure assistance and capital fertilization, lack of HR skills and weaknesses in partnership networks. The purpose of this study is to empower the community of MSME actors to achieve a society that is independent, self-sufficient, able to adopt innovations and develop MSMEs. Community empowerment carried out to MSME actors uses three aspects, namely, Enabling, Protecting, and Empowering. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach, then the data collection technique used is an interview and documentation technique with five informants, namely the State Civil Apparatus as many as three people and the community or MSME actors two people who refer to purposive sampling techniques. The data analysis used is an interactive model analysis technique from Miles and Huberman. The results of the study obtained an explanation that community empowerment through Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in the Diskopindag in Sampang District, Sampang Regency did not run optimally after being analyzed using three indicators of community empowerment because there are still many obstacles that are not in accordance with the expectations of MSME actors. So it can be concluded that community empowerment through Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises at the Department of Industry and Trade Cooperative in Sampang District, Sampang Regency, can be said to have not run optimally.

KEYWORDS:

Empowerment, Community, MSMEs

REFERENCES

1) Alouw, J. C., & Wulandari, S. (2020). Present status and outlook of coconut development in Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 418, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing.

2) Arora, P. K. (Ed.). (2019). Microbial Technology for the Welfare of society. Springer Singapore.

3) Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source

for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative science studies, 1(1), 377-386. 4) Bustani, B., Khaddafi, M., & Ilham, R. N. (2022). Regional Financial Management System of Regency/City

5) Dindler, C., Smith, R., & Iversen, O. S. (2020). Computational empowerment: participatory design in education. CoDesign, 16(1), 66-80.

6) Flick, U. (2020). Triangulation (pp. 185-199). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. TRIANGULASI

7) Francione, G. L. (2022). Animal welfare and society—Part 1, The viewpoints of a philosopher. Animal Frontiers, 12(1), 43-47.

8) Gleason, J. B., & Ratner, N. B. (2022). The development of language. Plural Publishing.

9) Hansen, G. E. (2019). Agricultural and rural development in Indonesia. Routledge.

10) Hitlin, P., & Shutava, N. (2022). Trust in government. Partnership for Public Service and Freedman Consulting.

11) Ley, S., Mattiace, S., & Trejo, G. (2019). Indigenous resistance to criminal governance: why regional ethnic autonomy institutions protect communities from narco rule in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 54(1), 181-200.

12) Lin, J. Y., & Jiang, H. X. (2020). Development of microLED. Applied Physics Letters, 116(10).

13) Mensah, I. K. (2020). Impact of government capacity and E-government performance on the adoption of E-Government services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 303-311.

14) Regional Original Income In Aceh Province Period Year 2016-2020. International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 2(3), 459-468.

15) Rosenberg, N. (2020). Technology and American economic growth. Routledge.

16) Stern, D. I. (2019). Energy and economic growth. In Routledge handbook of Energy economics (pp. 28-46). Routledge.

17) Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development. Pearson UK.

18) Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government information quarterly, 36(2), 167-178.

19) Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned?. Small business economics, 53, 21-49.

20) Wahyuningsih, S., & Afandi, M. (2020). Investigating English Speaking Problems: Implications for Speaking Curriculum Development in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 967-977.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023