VOlUME 06 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023
1I Gusti Ayu Vina Widiadnya Putri,2I Wayan Simpen,3I Nyoman Suparwa,4Ni Nyoman Seri Malini
1,2,3,4Universitas Udayana City, Denpasar 80582, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-64Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research is to analyze the elements of the discourse of men's power relations in the text. This study used data in integrated subject Indonesian textbooks of 2nd grade elementary school. In addition, textbooks are a form of research. This study uses data analysis methods along with field methods through observations and interviews. Data collection techniques are checklists, interviews and documentation of language forms in textbooks. The theory used in this research is discourse analysis theory (Dijk 1993). The results of this study show that there are elements of discourse that refer to male power relations in texts, such as microstructure, macrostructure and superstructure. Microstructure contains grammatical elements that include references, deletions and conjunctions. Context, situation and contact culture are the macro elements in the integrated subject textbooks of Indonesian primary school. Character values are implicitly described in text characters. The microstructure, macrostructure and superstructure of the data show the dominance of male power relations.
KEYWORDS:power relation, text book, discourse
REFERENCES
1) Alam, Jan, and Ikram Badshah. 2022. “An Exploration of Women’s Social Position in Primary and Middle School
Textbooks in Pakistan.” Human Affairs 32(1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-0006.
2) Alexopoulos, Christos, Anastasia G. Stamou, and Penelope Papadopoulou. 2022. “Gender Representations in the Greek
Primary School Language Textbooks: Synthesizing Content with Critical Discourse Analysis.” International Journal on
Social and Education Sciences 4(2): 257–74.
3) Aljuaythin, Wafa. 2018. “Gender Representation in EFL Textbooks in Saudi Arabia: A Critical Discourse Analysis
Approach.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 7(5): 151.
4) Arraman, Beril Choliq, and Nahdatul Hazmi. 2018. “Analisis Buku Teks Sejarah Kelas X Kurikulum 2013.” KAGANGA:
Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial-Humaniora 1(2): 122–40.
5) Babaii, Esmat, and Mohammad Sheikhi. 2018. “Traces of Neoliberalism in English Teaching Materials: A Critical
Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 15(3): 247–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1398671.
6) Coates, J. 1986. Women, Men and Language. London: Longman.
7) Dijk, Teun Van. 1993. Discourse and Society. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
8) Eva, S. 2015. “Analisis Jender Wacana Materi Pelajaran Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Di Sd Kelas Tinggi Bengkulu
Selatan.” Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 1(1): 1–10.
9) Holmes, J. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. United Kingdom: Longman Group.
10) Kuntjara Esther, and Anita Lie. . 2000. “Analisis Protokol Proses Membaca Dan Menulis Dalam Perspektif Jender”
Dalam PELLBA 13. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Unika Atmajaya.
11) Naim, Ngainun. 2012. Character Building. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
12) Nugroho, Catur. 2019. “Relasi Kuasa Media Dan Isu Gender Dalam Program Televisi Di Indonesia.” ProTVF 2(2): 111.
13) Pebriana, Putri Hana. 2021. “Analisis Keterbacaan Buku Teks Siswa Kelas IV Pada Tema I Dengan Menggunakan
Grafik Fry.” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK) 3(1): 28–35.
14) Purwanto, Tinggal. 2019. “Kesetaraan Gender Dan Relasi Kuasa Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an Tematik Kementrian Agama
Republik Indonesia.” PALASTREN 12(1): 30–63. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/protvf/article/view/20816/9704.
15) Rahmawati, Gustini. 2016. “Buku Teks Pelajaran Sebagai Sumber Belajar Siswa Di Perpustakaan Sekolah Di Sman 3
Bandung.” Edulib 5(1): 102–13.
16) Rohmawati, Sella, and Kristian Adi Putra. 2022. “Occupational Gender Stereotypes in Indonesian Secondary School
English Language Textbooks.” VELES Voices of English Language Education Society 6(1): 160–75.
17) Setyono, Budi, and Handoyo Puji Widodo. 2019. “The Representation of Multicultural Values in the Indonesian Ministry
of Education and Culture-Endorsed EFL Textbook: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Intercultural Education 30(4).
18) Sumarlam. 2013. Teori Dan Praktik Analisis Wacana. solo: KATTA.
19) Ulfah, Dewi, Idawati Garim, and Sultan Sultan. 2019. “Bias Gender Dalam Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia
Sekolah Menengah Atas.” RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya 12(2): 188.
20) Wardhaugh, Ronald. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics. Fifth Edit. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Sociolinguistics-Blackwell-Textbooks-
Linguistics/dp/140513559X.