VOlUME 06 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023
1Manik Sunuantar, 2Imsar Gunawan, 3Raihan Muhammad Farhan
1,2,3University of Al Azhar Indonesia & Jl. Sisingamangaraja No. 2, Selong, Kebayoran Baru District, South Jakarta – Jakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-94Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The Ministry of Health has designed the TEMENIN (Telemedicine Indonesia) application since 2017 for health workers in all regions of Indonesia.The use of TEMENIN is expected to accelerate patient health services, not only during the COVID-19 pandemic but also in other health services. For this reason, human resources for health workers who can adopt e health are needed. However, because of its implementation, there are still some areas for improvement in the TEMENIN application. The Indonesian Ministry of Health issued the KOMEN 2.0 application (Online Medical Consultation) as an update from TEMENIN. This study aims to identify and find out the activities of various e-health-based communication platforms used to improve the quality of health in Indonesia, especially the use of the KOMEN Application. The theories and concepts used in this research are the theory of Diffusion of Innovation, health communication, and telehealth literacy.The method used is descriptive qualitative by conducting in-depth interviews with the parties involved in using the KOMEN application in the Indonesian region, observing and studying the literature. The validity of the research uses source triangulation. Based on the research results, the activity of using the KOMEN application is still not optimal. This is because only some health workers have the same e-health literacy regarding the same KOMEN application, and the availability of infrastructure still needs to support the maximum use of KOMEN, especially in the 3T region in Indonesia.
KEYWORDS:Health Communication, TEMENIN, KOMEN, e-health literacy
REFERENCES
1) A. Baveja, A. Kapoor, and B. Melamed, “Stopping Covid-19: A pandemic-management service value chain approach,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 289, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03635-3.
2) M. Cruickshank and R. Z. Shaban, “COVID-19: Lessons to be learnt from a once-in-a-century global pandemic,” J. Clin. Nurs., vol. 29, no. 21–22, pp. 3901–3904, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jocn.15365.
3) H. C. Maharani and J. Jaeni, “Determinan Kebijakan Pemerintah Sebuah Solusi Keberlangsungan Usaha UMKM di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19,” AKSES J. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 26–39, 2021,
doi: 10.31942/akses.v16i1.4469.
4) W. C. Anggraeni, W. P. Ningtiyas, and N. M. Alimah, “Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Pemberdayaan UMKM Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Indonesia,” J. Gov. Polit., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–65, 2021.
5) detikNews, “Kasus Corona RI 31 Januari Tambah 10.185, DKI Sumbang 5.268,” detik.com, Jakarta, 2022.
6) World Health Organization, “TELEMEDICINE: Opportunities and developments in Member States,” Geneva, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_telemedicine_2010.pdf.
7) B. Suksmono, U. Sastrokusumo, T. L. R. Mengko, J. T. Pramudito, and S. Oktowaty, “Overview of telemedicine activities in indonesia: Progress and constraints,” in Proceedings - 6th International Workshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry, Healthcom 2004, 2004, pp. 37–40, doi: 10.1109/health.2004.1324464.
8) S. Alexandra, P. W. Handayani, and F. Azzahro, “Indonesian hospital telemedicine acceptance model: the influence of user behavior and technological dimensions,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1–13, 2021,
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08599.
9) Balitbagkes Kemenkes RI, “Aplikasi Telemedicine Berpotensi Merevolusi Pelayanan Kesehatan di Indonesia,” Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Kementerin Kesehatan RI, 2022.
https://www.balaibaturaja.litbang.kemkes.go.id/read-aplikasi-telemedicine-berpotensi-merevolusi-pelayanan-kesehatan-di-indonesia (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).
10) Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, “List Dokter yang telah bekerjasama,” Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2022.
https://temenin.kemkes.go.id/list_dokter/ (accessed Feb. 02, 2022).
11) P. Timpel and L. Harst, “Research implications for future telemedicine studies and innovations in diabetes and hypertension—a mixed methods study,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.3390/nu12051340.
12) S. Zoran, C. Turcott, A. Whitehead, L. Hrabik, A. Harris, and J. S. Schwoerer, “Rapid Transition to Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Medical Genetics Experience,” Wisconsin Med. J., vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 218–221, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34710304/.
13) A. Bahtiar and A. I. Munandar, “Stakeholder Analysis Pada Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Telemedicine Dalam Menghadapi Covid-19 Di Indonesia,” PREPOTIF J. Kesehat. Masy., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 68–79, 2021, doi: 10.31004/prepotif.v5i1.1304.
14) A. Riyanto, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pelaksanaan Telemedicine (Systematic Review),” J. Manaj. Inf. Kesehat. Indones., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 2021, [Online]. Available:
https://jmiki.aptirmik.or.id/index.php/jmiki/article/view/165.
15) D. F. Eprilianto, Y. E. K. Sari, and B. Saputra, “Mewujudkan Integrasi Data Melalui Implementasi Inovasi Pelayanan Kesehatan Berbasis Teknologi Digital,” JPSI (Journal Public Sect. Innov., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 2019,
doi: 10.26740/jpsi.v4n1.p30-37.
16) World Health Organization, “Stronger collaboration for an equitable and resilient recovery towards the health-related Sustainable Development Goals, incentivizing collaboration,” World Health Organization, Berlin, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341411/9789240026209-eng.pdf?sequence=1.
17) S. Asma et al., “Monitoring the health-related Sustainable Development Goals: lessons learned and recommendations for improved measurement,” Lancet J., vol. 395, no. 10219, pp. 240–246, 2020, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32523-1.
18) A. Kateryna, R. Oleksandr, T. Mariia, S. Iryna, K. Evgen, and L. Anastasiia, “Digital literacy development trends in the professional environment,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 55–79, 2020, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.19.7.4.
19) R. A. Harahap and F. E. Putra, Buku Ajar: Komunikasi Kesehatan, Pertama. Jakarta: Prenandamedia Group, 2019.
20) Society for Health Communication, “HEALTH COMMUNICATION : Its History and Future,” Austin, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.societyforhealthcommunication.org/assets/docs/History of Health Communication%2C 2019.pdf.
21) Tulane University’s School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, “10 Strategies for Effective Health Communication,” Tulane University’s School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 2020.
https://publichealth.tulane.edu/blog/health-communication-effective-strategies/ (accessed Jan. 01, 2022).
22) V. Mishra, “Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine during COVID-19,” Indian J. Public Health, vol. 64, pp. 234–236, 2020, doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_480_20.
23) E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, Fifth Edit. New York: Free Press, 2003.
24) S. S. Sundar, The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology. New Jersey (USA): Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.
25) M. Sunuantari, R. M. Farhan, and I. Gunawan, “TELEMEDICINE COMMUNICATION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN INDONESIA,” 2022, [Online]. Available: https://amic.asia/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/AMIC-BOOK-OF-ABSTRACTS-2021.pdf.
26) J. Brown, A. Morgan, J. Mason, N. Pope, and A. M. Bosco, “Student Nurses’ Digital Literacy Levels: Lessons for Curricula,” CIN - Comput. Informatics Nurs., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 451–458, 2020, doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000615.
27) T. Koltay, “The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy,” Media, Cult. Soc., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 211–221, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0163443710393382.
28) Y. Iriantara, Literasi Media : Apa, Mengapa, Bagaimana (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media, 2017.
29) A. Martin and J. Grudziecki, “DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development,” Innov. Teach. Learn. Inf. Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 249–267, 2015, doi: 10.11120/ital.2006.05040249.
30) A. J. Triana, R. E. Gusdorf, K. P. Shah, and S. N. Horst, “Technology literacy as a barrier to telehealth during COVID-19,” Telemed. e-Health, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1118–1119, 2020, doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0155.
31) T. Varis, “Communication competence and the information society,” Portal Rev. Cientifation, vol. 2, no. 2, 1997, doi: 10.1387/zer.17307.
32) R. T. S. Hariyati and J. Sahar, “Perceptions of nursing care for cardiovascular cases, knowledge on the telehealth and telecardiology in Indonesia,” Int. J. Collab. Res. Intern. Med. Public Heal., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 116–128, 2012.
33) M. Gillie, D. Ali, D. Vadlamuri, and K. J. Carstarphen, “Telehealth Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health: A Novel Screening Tool to Support Vulnerable Patient Equity,” J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2022, doi: 10.3233/ADR-210024.
34) C. M. Rutledge, T. Haney, M. Bordelon, M. Renaud, and C. Fowler, “Telehealth: Preparing Advanced Practice Nurses to Address Healthcare Needs in Rural and Underserved Populations,” Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2014, doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0061.
35) A. Karadag and T. Sengul, “Challenges faced by doctors and nurses in wound care management during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey and their views on telehealth,” J. Tissue Viability, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 484–488, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.09.001.
36) A. Salim, Teori & Paradigma Penelitian Sosial, Edisi Kedu. Yogyakarta: TIARA WACANA, 2006.
37) N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research (terjemahan). Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.
38) Informasi,” Jakarta, 2006.