VOlUME 06 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2023
1Yuniati, 2 Erham Amin, 3Anang Shophan Tornado
1Master of Notary, University of Lambung Mangkurat
2,3Faculty of Law, University of Lambung Mangkurat
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i8-02Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Notaries as public officials appointed by the authorities have the right and authority to make authentic deeds and get paid as a form of professionalism. Notaries are also obliged to provide legal assistance free of charge to people who can't afford it, but sometimes there are notaries who don't apply this. So that the purpose of this study is how to regulate the law on the provision of legal services free of charge by notaries to people who can't afford it and how to reconstruct regulations in the provision of legal services free of charge by notaries to people who can't afford it. The method used in this study uses normative research methods. So, the results of this study are first, the provision of legal services free of charge is mandatory, thus requiring a notary to provide legal services in the notary field free of charge to people who can't afford it. Second, Article 37 Notary Office Law has contradicted the values of justice that have been applied in the context of the 1945 Constitution Article 28D paragraph 2 which states that everyone has the right to get a job and get paid. So, it is necessary that the regulation on the provision of notary services for free can be regulated in implementing regulations and the regulation on the provision of free legal services is revised and reviewed, so that notaries have assistance from the government in the form of a budget to carry out the provision of legal services free of charge.
KEYWORDS:Construction, Legal Services, Free, Notary.
REFERENCES
1) Anand, Ghansam. Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2018.
2) Aulia, Fikri. “Implementasi Bantuan Hukum Oleh Notaris Secara Cuma-Cuma Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu.” Officium Notarium 1, no. 2 (2021): 305–16. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss2.art10.
3) Dias, Clarence J. Research on Legal Services and Paverty. Cetakan Pertama. Washington: Wasington University Law Quartely, 1975.
4) Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
5) ND., Mukti Fajar, dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Hukum Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
6) Sagala, Elviana. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Menjalankan Tugas Profesinya.” Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 4, no. 1 (15 Maret 2016): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v4i1.349.
7) Sari, Diah Ayu Puspita. “Makna Pemberian Jasa Hukum Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Pada Orang Tidak Mampu Terkait Sanksi Yang Diberikan Oleh Undang-Undang Jika Tidak Dipenuhi (Analisis Pasal 37 Ayat (1) Dan (2) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris No. 2 Tahun 2014).” Brawijaya Law Student Journal, 14 Juli 2016. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1759.
8) Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1983.
9) Somadiyono, Sigit. “Pelaksanaan Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Secara Cuma-Cuma Terhadap Orang Yang Tidak Mampu.” Jurnal Lex Specialis, no. 20 (14 November 2017): 99–112.
10) Sunggono, Bambang, dan Aries Hartanto. Bantuan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2001.
11) Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, dan A’an Efendi. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
12) Utami, Nuryanti Puji. “Penerapan Pemberian Jasa Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Secara Cuma-Cuma Oleh Notaris Berdasar Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Di Kabupaten Malang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik 3, no. 1 (5 Oktober 2017): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2017.003.01.10.