VOlUME 06 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2023
1Dyah Agustina, 2Bahtiar Usman
1,2Universitas Trisakti
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i8-55Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the influence of corporate social responsibility and ownership structure on financial performance of consumer non-cyclical companies in Indonesian. This study analyzes several variables, namely CSR, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, concentration of ownership, firm age, firm size and leverage to financial performance. This study uses secondary data obtained from the financial statements and annual reports of companies listed on the IDX for the period 2017 - 2022. The collection of research samples was carried out using a purposive sampling method or sampling with certain criteria. There were 33 with 198 observation data coming from 10 sub-industries of Consumer Non Cyclicals Companies. The data analysis used to test the hypothesis is a multiple regression test using eviews 10 software. The results show that CSR and firm age have a positive and significant effect on the financial performance. Meanwhile, institutional ownership, concentration of ownership, firm size and leverage have a negative and significant effect on the financial performance. Managerial ownership has no significant effect on the financial performance. The company should improve programs and policies that implement and integrate corporate social responsibility to company's business, adjusting the percentage of institutional share ownership and concentrated ownership through restructuring the share ownership structure. The company is also expected to reduce the company's leverage value and optimize the use of its assets to carry out profitable investment activities. The results of this study are expected to provide input for companies and investors to consider corporate social responsibility, share ownership structure, firm age, firm size and leverage.
KEYWORDS:concentration ownership; corporate social responsibility; financial performance; institutional ownership; managerial ownership
REFERENCES1) Abdullah, M. I., Sarfraz, M., Qun, W., & Chaudhary, M. (2019). Ownership concentration impact on firm financial performance. Logforum, 15(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.317
2) Abedin, S. H., Haque, H., Shahjahan, T., & Kabir, M. N. (2022). Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120567
3) Adebayo, A. O., Onikoyi, I. A., Kareem, T. A., & Lamidi, W. A. (2021). Influence of Board Characteristics and Ownership Concentration on Corporate Sustainability Growth among Listed Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria. Acta Universitatis Danubius, 17(3), 52–66.
4) Agatha, B. R., Nurlaela, S., & Samrotun, Y. C. (2020). Kepemilikan Manajerial, Institusional, Dewan Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit dan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Food and Beverage. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(7), 1811. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i07.p15
5) Al-Janadi, Y. (2021). Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in the Middle East: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120577
6) Alhaj, A., Mansor, N., & Hashim, U. J. (2022). The Effect Of Risk Management Committee And Ownership Concentration On Firm Performance In Emerging Markets: Empirical Evidence From Malaysia. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 3262–3284.
7) Ali, J., Tahira, Y., Amir, M., Ullah, F., Tahir, M., Shah, W., Khan, I., & Tariq, S. (2022). Leverage, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 11(01), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2022.111002
8) Alkurdi, A., hamad, A., Thneibat, H., & Elmarzouky, M. (2021). Ownership structure’s effect on financial performance: An empirical analysis of Jordanian listed firms. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1939930
9) Almehdawe, E., Khan, S., Lamsal, M., & Poirier, A. (2021). Factors affecting Canadian credit unions’ financial performance. Agricultural Finance Review, 81(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-06-2019-0065
10) Ananzeh, H., Alshurafat, H., & Hussainey, K. (2022). Do firm characteristics and ownership structure affect corporate philanthropic contributions in Jordan? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(5), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2020-0249
11) Chakroun, S., Salhi, B., Ben Amar, A., & Jarboui, A. (2020). The impact of ISO 26000 social responsibility standard adoption on firm financial performance: Evidence from France. Management Research Review, 43(5), 545–571. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2019-0054
12) Chandrasekaran, M. M. (2022). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Fuel Firm Performance? Evidence from the Asian Automotive Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215440
13) Cyril, U. M., Oluchukwu, U. R., & Ekene, N. C. (2022). Relationship between Environmental Costs and Financial Performance of Oil and Gas Firms in Nigeria. IIARD International Journal of Economics and Business Management, 8(4).
14) Dakhli, A. (2021). The impact of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: the moderating role of financial performance. Society and Business Review, 16(4), 562–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-01-2021-0013
15) Dakhli, A. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm financial performance: does audit quality matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 950–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2021-0150
16) Danso, A., Lartey, T. A., Gyimah, D., & Adu-Ameyaw, E. (2020). Leverage and performance: do size and crisis matter? Managerial Finance, 47(5), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-10-2019-0522
17) Daryaei, A. A., & Fattahi, Y. (2020). The asymmetric impact of institutional ownership on firm performance: panel smooth transition regression model. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(7), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0254
18) Din, S. U., Arshad Khan, M., Khan, M. J., & Khan, M. Y. (2022). Ownership structure and corporate financial performance in an emerging market: a dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(8), 1973–1997. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2019-0220
19) Do, D. T., Duong, hi Q. L., Nguyen, T. H. T., Nguyen, T. T. T., & Tran, M. D. (2022). The Impact of Ownership Structure on Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in Sri Lanka. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 29–34. https://slfa.lk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/efmp2021p_5.pdf
20) Farooq, M., Noor, A., & Ali, S. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 22(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2020-0286
21) Fernando, A. A. J., Mallawarachchi, R., & Kaluarachchi, D. G. P. (2021). The Relationship between Financial Leverage and the Performance of Sri Lankan Listed Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies (JAFAS), 7(4), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2021.035
22) Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach (Massachusetts (ed.)). Pitman, Boston. https://worldcat.org/en/title/9685996
23) Garanina, T., & Aray, Y. (2021). Enhancing CSR disclosure through foreign ownership, foreign board members, and cross-listing: Does it work in Russian context? Emerging Markets Review, 46(April 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100754
24) Gupta, N., Mittal, S., Agarwal, T., Bhakshi, P., & Sahoo, M. (2022). Ownership concentration and bank performance: Evidence from India. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2114177
25) Hamad, H. A. (2023). The Moderating Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from OECD Countries. Sustainability Journal, 15(8901). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118901
26) Hichri, A., & Ltifi, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: bidirectional relationship and mediating effect of customer loyalty: investigation in Sweden. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(7), 1495–1518. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2020-0472
27) Hunjra, A. I., Mehmood, R., & Tayachi, T. (2020). How Do Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance Affect Stock Price Crash Risk? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13020030
28) Jahid, M. A., Rashid, M. H. U., Masud, M. A. K., & Yaya, R. (2022). A longitudinal study of corporate social responsibility expenditure and ownership structure of financial firms. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(1).2022.03
29) Jensen, M. C., & William H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
30) Kirimi, P. N., Kariuki, S. N., & Ocharo, K. N. (2022). Ownership structure and financial performance: Evidence from Kenyan commercial banks. PLoS ONE, 17(5 May), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268301
31) Kristanto, A. K., & Yanto, H. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Sektor Consumer Cyclicals Sebelum Dan Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 11(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v11i2.51928
32) Kurawa, J. M., & Umar, U. H. (2019). Relationship between ownership concentration and financial performance of deposit money banks in Nigeria: Does a turning point exist? Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 7(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v7i2.8763
33) Mayranti, A., & Nurhayati. (2023). Pengaruh Firm Size dan Firm Age terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Bandung Conference Series: Accountancy, 3(1), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsa.v3i1.6030
34) Nabi, N., & Akter, M. (2021). Research in Business & Social Science Influence of CSR stakeholders on the textile firms performances: The mediating role of organizational legitimacy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 10(8), 25–38.
35) Nguyen, C. T., Nguyen, L. T., & Nguyen, N. Q. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The case in Vietnam. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2075600
36) Oncioiu, I., Petrescu, A. G., Bîlcan, F. R., Petrescu, M., Popescu, D. M., & Anghel, E. (2020). Corporate sustainability reporting and financial performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104297
37) Partalidou, X., Zafeiriou, E., Giannarakis, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2020). The effect of corporate social responsibility performance on financial performance: the case of food industry. Benchmarking, 27(10), 2701–2720. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0501
38) Presiden Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 Tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas. Undang-Undang Dasar RI, 53(9), 1689–1699.
39) Priyanka, Verma, R., & Sharma, D. (2021). The Impact of Ownership Structure on the Financial Performance of Indian Corporate Sector. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 20(2), 1–17.
40) Rashid, M. M. (2020). “Ownership structure and firm performance: the mediating role of board characteristics.” Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2019-0056
41) Rehman, I. U., Naqvi, S. K., Shahzad, F., & Jamil, A. (2022). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry: the moderating role of ownership concentration. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(2), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2020-0244
42) Revinka, S. (2021). PENGARUH PANDEMI COVID-19 TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN PADA SEBELAS SEKTOR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI). In Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Keuangan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik (Vol. 1).
43) Rusnaeni, N., Gursinda, H., Sasongko, H., & Hakim, D. R. (2022). FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE , INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP , SIZE , AND FIRM VALUE: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING APPROACH. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 2022(1), 258–271.
44) Rwakihembo, J., Aryatwijuka, W., Kalinda, P., Nimusiima, P., Rwakihembo, J., Aryatwijuka, W., & Kalinda, P. (2023). Firm Age and Financial Performance: The Firm Life- Cycle Theoretical Perspective of Private Limited Companies In Uganda Firm Age and Financial Performance: The Firm Life-Cycle Theoretical Perspective of Private Limited Companies In Uganda. International Journal of Business Strategies, ISSN 2519-(Issue 1,), pp 30-42. %0Awww.ajpojournals.org
45) Sahraoui, W., & Kabore, R. E. (2021). The relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and performance: the moderating effect of financial leverage. Open S. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03503462
46) Santos, E., & Castanho, R. A. (2022). The Impact of Size on the Performance of Transnational Corporations Operating in the Textile Industry in Portugal during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020717
47) Simanjuntak, O. T. W., Suripto, S., Wardianto, K. B., & Mulkhan, U. M. (2022). The effect of firm age, firm size on financial performance with financial inclusion as intervening variable: Study on the go public banking sector in Indonesia for the 2015-2020 period. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 2(3), 607–615.
48) Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
49) Tarighi, H., Appolloni, A., Shirzad, A., & Azad, A. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) and Financial Distressed Risk (FDR): Does Institutional Ownership Matter? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020742
50) Trafalgar, J., & Africa, L. A. (2019). The effect of capital structure, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and profitability on company value in manufacturing companies. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 9(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v9i1.1619
51) Vu, Nguyen, Ho, & Vuong. (2019). Determinants of Vietnamese Listed Firm Performance: Competition, Wage, CEO, Firm Size, Age, and International Trade. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12020062
52) Wardani, Y. A., & Setiawan, R. (2020). Concentration of Ownership , Firm Performance and Investor Protection Quality. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(8), 1188–1201. https://ijicc.net/images/vol_13/Iss_8/13887_Wardani_2020_E_R.pdf
53) World Health Organization. (2020). Overview of public health and social measures in the context of COVID-19. World Health Organization 2020., May, 1–8.
54) Younis, H., & Sundarakani, B. (2020). The impact of firm size, firm age and environmental management certification on the relationship between green supply chain practices and corporate performance. Benchmarking, 27(1), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2018-0363
55) Yousaf, M., & Dey, S. K. (2022). Best proxy to determine firm performance using financial ratios: A CHAID approach. Review of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2022-0010
56) Zainuddin, F., Wahyudi, S., & Muharam, H. (2021). Ownership concentration, investment opportunity, operational efficiency, and firm value in Indonesian banking industry. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24(4), 1–10.