¹Ika Yustikasari, ²Dr. Hari Purwadi

¹Student Master of Law, State University of Sebelas Maret Surakarta
²Departmental Lecturer Master of Law, State University of Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i9-11

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The destruction of evidence in the form of narcotics is one of the efforts to prevent the eradication of narcotics abuse in Indonesia, including preventing the abuse of authority by officials who handle criminal cases and so on. One of the law enforcers who carry out efforts to combat narcotics crime is the Attorney General's Office. In carrying out the destruction of evidence obtained from narcotics crimes by the Prosecutor, the Prosecutor must comply with the procedures regulated by the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia as a legal basis for carrying out his roles and functions in order to achieve the goals and aspirations of eradicating narcotics and other addictive substances. The results of the study show that the prosecutor's authority as the executor in carrying out the destruction of confiscated goods resulting from narcotics crime is that the prosecutor has state power that is independent from the influence of government power and other powers. The destruction of confiscated goods to prevent the re-circulation of narcotics crimes in the community is to destroy the confiscated goods in the form of narcotics. Obstacles in the implementation of the destruction of confiscated narcotics crimes so as to provide the possibility of misappropriation of narcotic evidence are seen in aspects of law enforcement, if fulfilled then the law regarding narcotics crimes in the scope of implementing the destruction of narcotics confiscated goods will be considered to have been effective.

KEYWORDS

Implementation; Extermination; Confiscated goods; Narcotics.

REFERENCES

1) Romli Atmasasmita, Tindak Pidana Narkotika Transnasional Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.

2) Yosia Herman, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemusnahan Barang Bukti Narkotika Ditinjau dari UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika,” Lex Priv., vol. V, no. 2, 2017.

3) Amrizal, “Pelaksanaan Pemusnahan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Daerah kepolisian Polda Riau,” Universitas Islam Riau, 2022.

4) dan N. A. Hendarta, Muhammad Said Karim, “Penganganan Barang Bukti Narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Barru,” Hermeneut. J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 5, no. 2, 2021.

5) dan H. M. Yohana EA Aritonang, July Ester, “Peranan Kejaksaan dan Upaya Melakukan Pengelolaan Hasil Eksekusia Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Binjai),” Nommensen Law Rev., vol. 01, no. 01, 2022.

6) Aisyah dan Apli Sahari, “Pemusnahan Barang Sitaan Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Penyimpangan Peredaran Kembali Barang Sitaan di Masyarakat (Studi Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Belawan),” J. Doktrin Rev., vol. 01, no. 01, 2022.

7) Hariman Satria, Anatomi Hukum Pidana Khusus. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2014.

8) Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor – Faktor yang Mempengaruhi penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1983.

Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023