¹Agus Sikwan, ²Muhammad Sabran, ³Elyta

^1,2,3Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i9-42

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study analyzes the Community Empowerment Model in improving the community's welfare in the border area through the district's regional program. Welfare conditions in border areas are quite apprehensive, especially about social welfare; it is necessary to accelerate the development of underdeveloped regions. This research method is included in descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This research tries to describe the Community Empowerment Model in improving the welfare of people in border areas through regional programs. The results of the study of the Community Empowerment Model in enhancing the interest of the community in the border area through the district regional program show that the district government's strategy in dealing with underdeveloped villages in the border area is only limited to designing local economic development such as development in the field of SMEs and infrastructure development, empowering village communities in its implementation developing independence and community welfare by utilizing resources through the establishment of Village development policies and programs. In addition, the provision of village facilities and infrastructure. Increasing the institutional capacity of the business world government, such as MSMEs and village cooperatives. The design that has been formed has yet to be implemented effectively by the government, so i t has not impacted increasing economic resilience in society.

KEYWORDS:

Community Empowerment, Border Areas, Regency Areas

REFERENCES

1) Abdullah. (2013). Daerah Perbatasan: Misrepresentasi Pembangunan dari Belakang, Badau Pasti Berlalu: Catatan Perjalanan dari Wilayah Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat. Yogyakarta: TICI Publications.

2) Ambar, T.S. (2004). Kemitraan dan Model-Model Pemberdyaan.Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

3) Damanik, A. (2019). Peran Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Memberdayakan Masyarakat. Jurnal Dakwah dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Desa.

4) Erly. S. (2008). Perencanaan Pajak Edisi 4, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

5) Gaffar, M.F. (1987). Perencanaan Pendidikan: Teori dan Metodologi, Depdikbud, Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi, (Jakarta: PPLPTK)

6) Govers, C & Hans. V. 1(997). The Politics of Ethnic Consciousness. New York: McMillan Press.

7) Lia, R. et al. (2015). Manajemen Perbatasan Fokus Inovasi Pendidikan di Perbatasan Kalimantan Utara. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, Volume 11, Nomor 3.

8) Mediaindonesia.com.(2022).Pemerintah Tingkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Kawasan Perbatasan https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/518537/pemerintah-tingkatkan-kesejahteraan-masyarakat-di-kawasan-perbatasan

9) Mediaindonesia.com.(2021). Pengelolaan Perbatasan Negara Fokus ke Kesejahteraan. https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/396408/pengelolaan-perbatasan-negara-fokus-ke-kesejahteraan

10) Midgley. J.(1995). Social Development: The Development Perspective in Social Welfare, London: Sage Publication.

11) Musa. (2017). Optimalisasi Peran Pemerintah dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat:Sebuah Tawaran dalam Mengentaskan Kemiskinan. Jurnal Dakwah dan Pengembangan Sosial Kemanusiaan , 124

12) Normina, N. (2016). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pendidikan. ITTIHAD, 14(26). http://jurnal.uinantasari.ac.id/index.php/ittihad/article/view/874

13) Nordholt, H. S. (1993). East Kalimantan: The Decline of a Commercial Aristocracy. By BURHAN AGENDA. Ithaca: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, 1991. viii, 113 pp. The Journal of Asian Studies, 52(3), 794-795. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-ofasian-studies/article/abs/east-kalimantan-the-decline-of-a-commercialaristocracy-by-magendaburhan-ithaca-cornell-modern-indonesia-projectsoutheast-asia-program-cornell-university-1991-viii-113- pp/FAE1886002E05F713C9D600E8C7C5EF7

14) Nurohman, T. (2007). Peran Lsm Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Peran Lsm Kompleet Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Di Desa Melung Kabupaten Banyumas). Ilmu Politik FISIP Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Purwokerto.

15) Sari, I.P. (2013). Konstruksi Identitas Komunitas Perbatasan : Perebutan Simbol Negara-Bangsa di Desa Badau, Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu, Kalimantan Barat. Skripsi. Yogyakarta : Universitas Gadjah Mada

16) Suharto. (2005). Membangun masyarakat memberdayakan rakyat. Bandung: Rafika Aditama.

17) Swasono, S.E. (2012). Pancasila Doktrin Kebangsaan dan Doktrin Kerakyatan: Pelembagaan Nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam Perspektif Ekonomi dan Kesejahteraan Sosial. Makalah untuk Kongres Pancasila 2012, bertema Strategi Pelembagaan Nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam Menegakkan Konstitusionalitas Indonesia. Kerjasama Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dan Universitas Gadjah Mada,Yogyakarta.

18) Todaro, M.P. (2004). Ekonomi Pembangunan di Dunia Ketiga Edisi VI. Jakarta: Erlangga.

19) Usman, S. (2004). Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

20) Zubaedi. (2007).Wacana pembangunan alternatif: ragam perspektif pengembangan dan pemberdayaan

Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023