October 2024

Volume 07 Issue 10 October 2024
Typology of Muslim Audience in Responding to Media Contents Consist of Religious Symbols
1Muchammad Nasucha, 2Mohamad Ghozali Moenawar, 3Rhegina Leony Fariaz, 4Zalfa Zayyan Nasution
1,2,3,4Communication Science Department, University Al-Azhar Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i10-25

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Audience is one of central terms that related with media according to the historical of the terms and the mass communication discourse. On the other sides, audiences referring to several authors who have given their concerns to it, audience related to economic, business, technology, politic, and etc. interest. Audience came after the media invented. However, the audience dynamic from the previous (ancestor) periods to our current time still relevant to be explored, described, and explained particularly that related to the Muslim community as the increasing community in world and as major community in Indonesia, in this research look through the religious symbols on media contents to be based of category of Muslim audience as the actor related with the media. Therefore, this research tries to find the typology of Muslim audience in responding to media contents consisting of religious symbols. This research using quantitative and qualitative data which was collected through cross-sectional survey. The UG approach and Active audience approach promoted by authors as Biocca being the theoretical based in collecting and analysis data of this research. The descriptive statistic is the quantitative result to be based the typology and the qualitative data to find the enrich and deeper description and explanation about how Muslim use media until researcher be able to make the categorization of Muslim audience regarding how they have responded to media contents consisting religious symbols. Finally, this research got seven big or rough categories of Muslim audiences in responding to media content containing religious symbols. There are clear enough that online platform media, primarily media social as the dominant media looking over the Muslim audience in this research as instagram. Almost 80% the audiences looking for the media content consisting of religious symbols when they are using media. Also the major of the audiences in this research are young people, which have educational background senior high school, and when they are asked through questionnaire they are students the particular sub-topics show us they are hesitated to give their judgment on them. However, even there are a number of interesting findings, two typical result that religious symbols could be used to educational purposes even they think the content usually bring to the controversy in society, at least what we find frequently on media social.

KEYWORDS:

Muslim audience typology, media content, religious symbols, media uses.

REFERENCES
1) Ruddock, Andy. (2001). Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. London: Sage.

2) Hall, Stuart., Evans, Jessica., and Nixon, Sean. (Eds.) (2013). Representation. Second edition. Los Angeles: Sage

3) Flew, Terry. (2014). New Media. Fourth Edition, Oxford: Oxford Press University.

4) McQuail, Denis. (2000). McQuail’s Mass Theory. London: Sage.

5) Emma Baulch, (2017). “Mobile phones: advertising, consumerism and class,” in Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and Divergence, Edwin Jurriens and Ross Tapsell (eds). Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, 2017, pp. 38-54.

6) Poe, Marshall T. (2011). A History of Communications: Media and Society from the Evolution of Speech to the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

7) Kotler, Philip., Hermawan Kartajaya, and Iwan Setiawan, “Marketing 4.0: Moving from traditional to digital.” New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2017.

8) Moenawar, M. Ghozali, dan Muchammad Nasucha, (2016). “Values driven approach dalam implementasi integrated marketing communication: pengalaman Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia”, dalam ICCIC (International Conference of Communication Industry and Community), Komunikasi Industri & Komunitas, Vol. 2, Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Tarumanegara, 2016, pp.398-410.

9) Mohamad Susilo, “Banjir pujian, iklan Amazon yang tampilkan imam dan pendeta”, BBC News Indonesia, [Online] available: https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah-38323618 [Accessed: 2 Maret 2020].

10) Einstein, Mara. (2008). Brands of faith: Marketing religion in a commercial age. London & New York: Routledge.

11) Sheffield, Tricia. (2006). “The Religious Dimensions of Advertising,” New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

12) Vilanilam, J.V., and A.K. Varghese, (2004). “advertising basics! a resource guide for beginners” New Delhi: Response Books.

13) Suwatno, H. (2017). Komunikasi Pemasaran Kontekstual. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

14) Nasucha, Muchammad. (2019). “The social interpretation on relation of religion and environment on internet”. Proceeding of International Conference on Communication, Culture and Media Studies (CCCMS). a. https://journal.uii.ac.id/CCCMS/article/download/13677/9617

15) Littlejohn, Stephen W., Foss, Karen A., and Oetzel, John G. (2017). Theories of Human Communication. 11th Edition. Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press Inc.

16) Sullivan, John L. (2013). Media Audiences: Effects, Users, Institutions, and Power. Los Angeles: Sage.

17) Griffin, Em., Ledbetter, Andrew., and Sparks, Glen. (2019). A First Look at Communication Theory. 10th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

18) Chung, Deborah S., and Yoo, Chan Yun. (2008). “Audience Motivations for Using Interactive Features: Distinguishing Use of Different Types of Interactivity on an Online Newspaper.” ISSN: 1520-5436 print=1532-7825. DOI: 10.1080/15205430701791048 online Mass Communication and Society, Routledge. 11: 375–397

19) Esposito, John L., et al. (2012). Moderat atau Radikal. Jakarta: Referensi.

20) Zahrah, Imam Muhammad Abu. (1996). Aliran Politik dan Aqidah dalam Islam. Terjemah. Jakarta: Logos.

21) Dwijatmiko, Andika. (2019). Branding Syariah. Yogyakarta: Irtikaz.

22) PR Smith and Ze Zook, (2011). “Marketing Communications: Integrated offline and online with social media,” fifth edition, London, Philadelphia, New Delhi: KoganPage

23) Chris Fill & Sarah Turnbull. (2015). Marketing Communication: Discovery, creation and conversations. Seventh edition. Edinburg, Pearson Education Limited.

24) Huda, Nurul., Khamim Hudori, Rizal Fahlevi, Badrussa’diyah, Dea Mazaya, dan Dian Sugiarti, (2017). Pemasaran Syariah: Teori Aplikasi. Depok: Kencana.

25) Neuman, W. Lawrance. (2014) “Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches,” seventh edition, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2014.

26) Leavy, Patricia. (2017). “Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed-Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches”. New York & London: The Guilford Press.

27) Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Third Edition, Los Angeles: Sage.

28) Creswell, John W. and J. David Creswell. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fifth Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.

29) Treadwell, Donald. (2017). Introducing Communication Research: Paths of Inquiry. Third Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.

30) Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln (ed.). (2018). “The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research”. Fifth Edition. Los Angeles, London: Sage.
Volume 07 Issue 10 October 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar