Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024
1Agustinus Sumaryono, 2Masduki Ahmad, 3Suryadi
1,2,3Postgraduate Program, State University of Jakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-44Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study aims at showing the importance of educational concept of John Dewey. Thus, this research is expected to provide new insights and significantly contribute to design the education planning according to John Dewey’s philosophy. This research uses a descriptive research type method to better understand about John Dewey’s concept in education, especially from the book “How We Think.” This research results show that John Dewey’s education highly prioritizes the intellectual side, unlike what has been accused so far that Dewey’s education tends to be more practical and not intellectual. In addition, Dewey’s education concept can also have an impact on education in Indonesia. Although this study tries to explore the concept of Dewey’s education in the book “How We Think”, it is still at a level that is not yet deep. More in-depth research is needed to develop an education concept that can be applied in the education system in Indonesia
KEYWORDS:John Dewey, Thinking, School aim, Indonesian School, role of teacher
REFERENCES1) Ahmad, Masduki, and Heni Rochimah. 2021. “Improving Teaching Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership and Integrity.” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 10 (4): 1316–24. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.21801.
2) Attick, Dennis. 2006. “John Dewey and the Decline of American Education (Review).” Education and Culture 22 (2): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2007.0000.
3) Bulle, Nathalie. 2018. “What Is Wrong with Dewey’s Theory of Knowing.” Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5 (20201214): 575–606. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.021.
4) Dewey, John. 1910. How We Think. Boston: D.C. Heatg & Co.
5) Durst, Anne. 2010. “John Dewey and the Beginnings of the Laboratory School BT - Women Educators in the Progressive Era: The Women behind Dewey’s Laboratory School.” In , edited by Anne Durst, 9–24. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109957_2.
6) Fott, David. 1991. “John Dewey and the Philosophical Foundations of Democracy.” The Social Science Journal 28 (1): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90042-3.
7) Garrison, Jim, Stefan Neubert, and Kersten Reich. 2012. John Dewey’s Philosophy of Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8) Gutek, G. 2014. Philosophical, Ideological, and Theoretical Perspectives on Education. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson.
9) Hansen, David T. 2006. A Critical Engagement with Dewey’s Democracy and Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
10) Komalasari, Imas, Ita Rustiati Ridwan, and Fitri Alfarisa. 2021. “Upaya Guru Dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar Pada Pembelajaran IPS: Studi Literatur.” Didaktika 1 (1): 26–35. https://doi.org/10.17509/didaktika.v1i1.32597.
11) Linda, Zakiah, and Ika Lestari. 2019. Berpikir Kritis Dalam Konteks Pembelajaran. Erzatama Karya Abadi. Bogor: Erzatama Press.
12) Luntley, Michael. 2016. “What’s the Problem with Dewey?” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy VIII (1): 0–21. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.444.
13) Maiaweng, Peniel C.D. 2009. “Kajian Analisis Terhadap Konsep Pemikiran John Dewey.” Jurnal Jaffray 7 (2): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v7i2.029.73-86.
14) Martin, Jay. 2002. The Education of John Dewey: A Biography. New York: Columbia University Press.
15) Neubert, Stefan. 2012. “Criticism and Concerns — Reconstructing Dewey for Our Times.”
16) Rolfe, Gary. 2014. “Rethinking Reflective Education: What Would Dewey Have Done?” Nurse Education Today 34 (8): 1179–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.03.006.
17) Savage, Daniel M. 2002. John Dewey’s Liberalism: Individual, Community, and Self-Development. Choice Reviews Online. Vol. 39. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-6712.
18) Schreier, Helmut. 2015. “Dewey, John (1859-1952).” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition 6:332–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.61024-3.
19) Sumaryono, Agustinus, and Sugiyono Sugiyono. 2019. “Implementing Peace Curriculum at Catholic Senior High School in Bali.” KnE Social Sciences 2019:91–98. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4627.
20) Suryadi, S, R N Aulia, N Rahmah, and ... 2022. “Transformational Leadership
in Growing Student Entrepreneurship.” … , Education, Law, and …, 1–7.
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/hispisi/article/view/30505%0Ahttp:
//journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/hispisi/article/download/30505/13721.
21) Thorburn, Malcolm. 2018. “John Dewey, Subject Purposes and Schools of Tomorrow: A Centennial Reappraisal of the Educational Contribution of Physical Education.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 19 (March): 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.04.001.
22) Wasitohadi, Wasitohadi. 2014. “HAKEKAT PENDIDIKAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF JOHN DEWEY Tinjauan Teoritis.” Satya Widya 30 (1): 49. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2014.v30.i1.p49-61.
23) Williams, Morgan K. 2017. “John Dewey in the 21st Century.” Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education 9 (1): 91–102.
24) Zeinu Hassen, Mohammed. 2023. “A Critical Assessment of John Dewey’s Philosophy of Education.” International Journal of Philosophy, no. June. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20231102.13.
