Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024
1Suwarno Hadi, 2Achmad Noor Fatirul, 3SDjoko Adi Walujo
1,2,3PGRI Adi Buana University of Surabaya, Street Dukuh Menanggal XII-4 Surabaya, East Java
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-45Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to describe the application of the demonstration method vs. the discussion method on student learning outcomes, this study also seeks differences between students who have high motivation and low motivation towards improving student learning outcomes and seeks interactions between learning methods and learning motivation towards improving student learning outcomes on the material of chassis maintenance and repair in class XII at SMK PGRI 1 Gresik. The results and conclusions in this study are that (1) there is a difference in achievement between students who are given the demonstration method and discussion method treatment towards improving student learning outcomes, meaning that students who are given the demonstration method treatment obtain higher student learning outcomes than students who are given the discussion method treatment, (2) Students who have high motivation obtain higher learning outcomes compared to students who have low motivation, (3) and there is an interaction between learning methods and student learning motivation towards improving student learning outcomes on the material of chassis maintenance and repair in class XII students at SMK PGRI Gresik
KEYWORDS:Demonstration Method, Discussion Method, Learning Motivation, Learning Outcomes
REFERENCES1) Ahmad, Mudzakir. 2007. Educational Psychology. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
2) Arikunto, Suharsimi.2009, Research Procedure, A Practical Approach, Jakarta: Bina Aksara
3) Berg, Euwe.1991. Misconceptions of Mathematics and Remediation. Salatiga: Satya Wacana Christian University.
4) Darmawan, Didit. 2006. Research Methodology An Introduction, Metromedia Mandiri Pustaka: Surabaya.
5) Hadi Sutrisno. 2007. Statistics Volume 2. Yogyakarta: YPFP. UGM
6) Hamalik, O. 1981. Teaching and Learning Process. PT Bumi Aksara: Jakarta
7) Handayanto, Supriyono Koes. 2002. Teaching and Learning Strategy. Lecture notes, State University of Malang.
8) Hudojo, H. 2008. Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture
9) Il. Pasaribu and B. Simanjuntak. 2003. Personality Theory. Tarsito: Bandung
10) Indrakusuma, Dean, Amir. 1995. Educational Development Media, Fa Dian Indah Pustaka, Surabaya.
11) Irwanto. 2007. General Psychology. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
12) Joyce, Bruce and Weil, Marsha. 1980. Models of Teaching. 2-nd edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
13) Institute for Educational Assessment and Development (LP3). 2008. Learning Methods. Airlangga University.
14) Lisa Choiru Trsinawati. 2004. Reading and Writing Tutoring for Students of Muslimat XII Rahayu Kindergarten. Thesis. Unpublished. State University of Malang.
15) Mila Ratnawati. 2006. The Relationship between Children's Perceptions of Family Atmosphere, Self-Image, and Achievement Motives with Learning Achievement in Grade V Students of Ta'Miriyah Elementary School Surabaya. Anima Journal Vol XI No. 42.
16) Mustangin. 2002. Basics of Mathematics Learning. Islamic University of Malang.
17) Nana, Sudjana. 2001. Assessment of the Results of the Teaching and Learning Process. Seventh edition. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
18) Paulina. 2002. Learning and Teaching. Open University. Jakarta
19) Purwanto, Ngalim. 2007. Educational Psychology. CV. Remaja Karya: Bandung
20) Ratumanan, T.G. 2002. Learning and Teaching. FKIP Pattimura University Ambon.
21) Robbins, P. Stephen. 2003. Organizational behavior. Ninth edition. PT. Indeks Grup Gramedia. Jakarta
22) Roestiyah, N.K. 2007, Teaching and Learning Strategies, Bina Aksara: Jakarta.
23) Rusyan, Rusdi. 2007. Teaching and Learning Strategies. PT. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.
24) Saifuddin Azwar. 2008. Achievement Test Functions and Development of Learning Achievement Measurement. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
25) Sarlito Wirawan. 2007. Adolescent Psychology. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
26) Sia, Tjundjing. (2001). the Relationship between IQ, EQ, and QA with Academic Achievement in High School Students. Anima Journal Vol. 17 no. 1
27) Subiyanto. 2009. Science Education Evaluation. Jakarta: P2LPTK.
28) Subiyanto. 2008. Natural Science Education. Jakarta: P2LPTK
29) Sudikin & Mundir. 2005. Research Methods: Guiding and Delivering Your Success in the World of Research. Insan Cendikia: Surabaya.
30) Sudjana. 2006. Statistics II. Bina Aksara. Jakarta
31) Sukarno. 2005. Basics of Science Education. Jakarta: Rajawali
32) Sumadi, Suryabrata. 2008. Educational Psychology. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
33) Umar, Husein, 2003, Organizational Behavior Research Methods, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama Jakarta.
34) Law of the Republic of Indonesia. 2003. Number 20 of 2003 Concerning the National Education System. House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia
35) Usman, Uzer, Mohammad. 2009. Becoming a Professional Teacher. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung.
36) Walgito, Bimo, 2009. Introduction to General Psychology. (Revised edition). Andi Offset: Yogyakarta
37) Wasis DS, Bulletin of the Book Center. Vol.10: 2004.
38) Widayat, 2004. Marketing Research Methods, SPSS Software Application. First Edition. Publisher UMM Press. Malang.
39) Winarsunu, Tulus, 2002. Statistics in Psychology and Educational Research, First Edition. Malang: Publisher UMM Press
40) Winkel, WS, 2007. Educational Psychology and Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Gramedia.
41) Winkel, WS. 2003. Psychology and Learning Evaluation. PT. Gramedia: Jakarta.
42) Winkel. 2007. B. Educational Psychology and Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Gramedia
